Member Info for AbjectPerformer

Bought for first time in psn £450, 1430

Smart E pants deadly4u is right in that you can’t expect to time the market or feel upset if you didn’t predict the bottom and your investment goes down before it goes up.

It is true we don’t like losing money but if you stick a few key principles you should be fine
1 buy decent fundementals stocks
2 don’t get hung up on a particular company you like. Look at a range of companies and pick one whose SP is down and fundamentals are good
3 buy knowing it could go down further , and invest only what you can afford to leave in until it recovers

I have bought £500 at 430, £400 at 415, and will buy £400 more at 380.

I see a recovery in 12 months and plan to hold long term so all is ok

When is coupon due and what will happen on 9th?

Mario draghi is looking for a new job so maybe he could run us when nationalised ??

Handymandy you’re the one needing professional help. You sound like a nut case on a regular basis

The only other scenario I see is America shafting Evr holders

I have carefully read the information relating to the sale of the NA assets and the involvement of the OFSI.

I really don’t see a scenario where evraz keep the funds of the sale and leave holders outside Russia with nothing.

My understanding is that this sale will either be used by dispose of western assets and this western holders, a total package of negotation by EVR with the OFSI, or if this isn’t the offer , the OFSI would blanket ban this sale.

I don’t see a scenario where it benefits the OFSI to allow EVR a sale and retain the funds .. effectively disappearing into Russia and the oligarch coffers, leaving non Russians with jack sheet .

Correct me if I’m wrong but the certs and sale seem to go hand in hand with an easy western exit route?

Barc is up 15% while Lloyds is up 6% because Barc had tanked further so less pressure up.

Has a better model imo too , other than their mishaps

Jotom750

“Why do you and your boss continue to push these untruths?”

Infinity888 isn’t my boss. I left the telegram group as I can’t stand it. But I’ll agree when he occasionally makes a decent point.,

I accept there are two sides to the cert/nominee debate.

Thanks

The best play on this stock was to load up at 188-200p hold for divi and sell when we hit 240, or accumulate more if we go lower than 188

Fully agree with infinity888 comment
“Sanction itself are an extreme grey zone and unclear what the Gov will do, how institutions (broker) react. In principle its everyones decision to move off the nominee or not. We are on a course of uncertainties and a range of possible outcomes. For me to be in control of any option is more worth than 20% capital gain tax. Its not about maximise the profit, to me is to be able to have the best option. Again only my personal view, worth 2 penny”

There is no point holding onto a tax wrapper when we may not get dividends but may get an option to sell or be bought out etc. we don’t even know what the level of dividend may be and for many the potential tax saving is not worth the inflexibility.

Anyone got any links to information pertaining to previous sanctions, their duration and reasons for release?

As things stand certs don’t offer anything more than nominee.

But things could change.

Paper certs can receive dividends, or be put back to nominee one future.

The fact evraz has hinted get certs and RA put them in his name, tells me that things are going to change.

It MAY be that a new eventuality transpires, in which case paper should help with such eventuality.

Hi,

Received two letters . One a paper cert. Other a letter with a form requesting bank details for divi payment , and instruction on comms from the company (paper/online)

Should I give UK bank details or do I need an overseas bank account?

Secondly do I ask for paper communications?

I have 28 days to respond on the latter

Reading the comments in here is like a repeat of reading them in March.
I bought shares from my own conviction. But one could be fooled into buying or selling based on the repetitive ramp and deramping on this board.

What’s concerning is the posts today since 220p are reminiscent not of days ago , but of months ago. Which says to me there is a persistent and concerted effort by a number of posters here , trying to influence traders.

My paper certs arrived today in post but been too busy to open yet.

That said I don’t see any advantages to holding paper certs. . I only see that there could potentially be a disadvantage by having them with a broker. The difference for a Uk holder is likely to be marginal.

A citizen of a country who has not sanctioned evraz , but has bought Evraz shares on the LSE , is likely to be the kind of shareholder that the evraz RNS is targeting its message at, as they could feasibly bypass this sanction if they were holding shares in a Uk broker?

Overall I see a lot of talk about potential for being bought out or receiving dividends.

I feel having read many arguments over the weeks, that we are clutching at straws as to how any sanction will be circumvented as a UK holder, I also don’t see the UK bodies ensuring a deal for ENA which is palatable being pushed in the interests of Uk holders. If it does occur it will be a byproduct of any outcome that serves UK gov. In which case we are rose between a Russian and UK thorn.

Doubt this ends well for any of us. But time will tell.

They stopped the yourshare scheme this year £500 free shares, and saveshare scheme two years ago , but I think there is a plan to reinstate it. Probably don’t want employees securing cheap 5 year deals lol.

Jansen tight as a ducks arse

In a recent interview kier starmer was saying he would increase taxes on stocks and shares. So I doubt removing tories and installing labour would improve our standing re evraz .

Thanks coggy