Member Info for AB124

Hi, I did post in the above thread but it seems to have gone.
was Hasiba's hypothesus correct that the Covid 19 is likely to "burn itself out" rather than needing much further work on vaccines?
it was an interesting post but it doesn't seem to be here.

hasiba
Are you suggesting that if we continue with the UK vaccination regime, once complete the Virus will (effectively) simply burn itself out?
That sounds a little at deviance to what I understood the position to be, but if correct it really is very good news.
I thought things were a bit more difficullt than that but am very happy to hear different.
Thanks for your input on this.

Brian01
Interesting view. I must say I'd always gone along with the idea that abdication was probable rather than possible, but it will be interesting to see how Anno Domini plays out against the demanding physical requirements of Queenship.
There's plenty to take over, but therein lies a problem in itself!
Anyway, bit early for such speculation. a lot to get through in the next few days and weeks.

Going to be strange without him.
I wonder whether the Queen will abdicate next year?
Sad news all round.

Thanks for the Filter, great idea.
My last on this, but your nocturnal posts on Wednesday night were all statements as far as I can see apart from the repost from Cleanerworld. I couldn't see any "Pertinent questions".
Anyway thanks for your attention.

Scousemark
Have you ever been the object of critical, (as Hasiba puts it) demeaning or even abusive posts where there is no reprieve or even apology?
People can see things from different viewpoints.
AIMO

hasiba,
Kashdog has a point but only in the context of your post.
I think you might find that the "adjudicator" issue emanates from the very individual you support against others here.
For a TA influenced poster your lack of logic (and equal treatment of all) in your post is surprising.

Try looking at your protege’s post yesterday at 15.42 in response to a straightforward comment. Hardly the post of an open mind (or reasonable poster).
"CHELSEA7
Posts: 43,845
Price: 22.20
No Opinion
RE: 150k Delayed BuyToday 15:42
""Wonder whether we will see the expected more big buys?""

You don"t give up!!!

100k BUY at 23.10 LOL"

Maybe you now feel the need to take over the role of adjudicator (which your post plainly does).
As you say, "Guys you need to respect each other’s free speech posts without demeaning others". However you look at it your statement applies equally to the individual you champion as to others. Do you think your protege is blameless?
Anyway the addition of the comment that people should ignore the "Trolls" you are hardly being a paragon of "live and let live”
As I mentioned yesterday, (and now removed) not a very level playing field on LSE, which actually stems not necessarily initially from Admin but perhaps from those that they appease.
AIMO

What a pointless occupation posting here has become.
Unless it is a glitch (and if so LSE should look to their systems) looks like another set of posts from many have been taken down to appease the few.
Incredible.

RuckRover
i completely see where you're coming from. I agree that (fully funded - and significantly backed) Scancell has now become much more of an "investment" than ever it was. Any attempts to Ramp (or Deramp) the SP will probably cost those involved rather than make them a short term profit as used to be the case (assuming it was traded on the "short " side) LOL.
Things are now radically different and if the "Science" lives up to its promise and the BOD keep on top of timelines things should work out well.
Yep there will be some trade chances but not as many as some might suggest.
AIMO

Sorry for dup (again)

Ray Pointer
Is that the industry "Taking the p*ss"? LOL

Ray Pointer
Is that the the industry "taking the p*ss!? LOL

RuckRover,
I would say that I think there will be trading opportunities here but not EVERY day.
My point (obvioulsy made badly) that the trading opportunities come when the Share price gains momentum (one way or the other). as a result I don't believe that every day presents a trading opportunity. In fact overtrading is a really good way to lose all the accumulated profits so far.
So to encapsulate, I think that the way forward here is to be long and patient, and take trading profits on spikes. Volatility and volume are the keys here and there's not been too much of that recently. It will come back but when? It matters not what we think here, what does matter is what the collective market thinks.
AIMO

Have just seen the items overnight. It seems to me that some expect Scancell to be producing share price movements daily which will be sufficient to allow trades which make profit opportunities.
To expect to be able to enter and close trades on a share like this on say a weekly basis is completely unrealistic and so an invest and wait policy seems to me to be the only way forward. Once the volatility happens then fine, but until then patience and watch for other opportunities in your portfolio.
We mustn't expect Scancell to be the centre of the investment universe because it isn't.
AIMO.

Does anybody actually know what a statistically significant number would be in the clot connection? Surely until that (amongst other numbers) is established there is not much that can be said about the situation?

RuckRrover
Thank heavens for that, I thought it was me, but now everything is back (I suppose).
Makes you wonder LOL.

shareguard
I think the context of the letter and the distribution is significant.

""Thank you for your letter of 1 March with further advice on:

giving local teams flexibility to vaccinate homeless people and rough sleepers alongside cohort 6

vaccination of detainees, as well as use of any leftover end of day vaccine for prison officers

extended dosing strategy and intervals between doses""

IMO (FWIW) the letter covers an enquiry relating to the current vaccination programme and distribution and use and of existing facilities. It doesn't seem to me to be discussing the future development of universal Vaccines.
Could be wrong but...

Ivyspivey
Sorry, did not see your post under the different thread...
Think we're saying the same thing....

It looks to me like the vaccine OFFER is universal (sic) rather than the offer of a UNIVERSAL vaccine.
Semantics I think....

RuckRover
I have to go out (I'm told) but what have we in common as Resolute Holders?
I'll kick off with,
Patience
Optimism
Long term Masochistic delight in Watching the SP (until recently).
Short term delight in Watching the SP (recently).

I'm sure there's so many more but that's my (short term) offer. :-)