Member Info for A_E_Marsh

""Out of interest, which board were you referring to?"" I was being sarcastic... (for once!) I see I've been proven right/wrong... Your call. Thanks IM. However, I am aLso in DOR.

Wrong board.

Start of an exciting new week, much to look forward to, I wouldn't want to be out of this!

Trying to mentally bully us now. BoD,I have voted how I want and I don't give a damn for what you want.

"".you Grumps and Mr Marsh can do all the important stuff .."" Yep, fine by me, give me a broom and I'm off to sweep the floor ASAP! BTW, anybody got a chamois? These windows need some work. (Blue day... can't knock it...)

""Therefore fund managers will be able to start playing games with the BoD and tell what to say and do"" "Fund Manager's? A pox upon them, sir", as Dr Johnson would say. Look on the bright side, you know how difficult it is to find two people on this web-site who agree with each other? Imagine how difficult it is to find two Fund Manager's who agree! Most of them don''t even have the power of reasoning! (I hope!)

"PS: legal issues from Canadian clients and S&G are hardly background noise.."" That's your opinion. There is a long time between now and then. Until some sign of a settlement is showing, it really doesn't matter in terms of the daily share price. BTW, "Canadian clients...." Oh, that's a new one, don't forget to throw in the SFO and YLF to do the whole job! ""I wouldn't underestimate them..."" Nor will I, when they prove they are relevant.

post this twice! ""After a direct request to the company it has been confirmed that Stefan Borson holds 300,000 WTG shares. These are held in his own name on the register."" Thanks for that news, your efforts are appreciated by all genuine holders

""What's the rationale for still holding this stock?"" Good cash, low number of shares in issue, very good business fundamentals, great potential, established contacts and networks,legal "issues" almost certainly insignifiicant background noise, IM LEAVES SOON! C'MON WATCHSTONE! MOVE YER BLOOMIN' ARSE! (With apologies to GBS) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r86BJkLZp9w GLA.

""What's the rationale for still holding this stock?"" Good cash, low number of shares in issue, very good business fundamentals, great potential, established contacts and networks,legal "issues" almost certainly insignifiicant background noise, IM LEAVES SOON! C'MON WATCHSTONE! MOVE YER BLOOMIN' ARSE! (With apologies to GBS) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r86BJkLZp9w GLA.

""If you sold at 41p (July 2015 !!!!), Why keep posting on this by."" Actually Dar, that was April 2015 and (luckily/conveniently/"inaccurately"?)exactly pre Gorham. Don't believe all you are told by people on the internet though, as you know... No RNS on recent share price movement? From such a pro-active BoD? What a surprise.

""Dar........I bet their jobs stink!"" Didn't he mean "jibes"?

I need to buy and then and see a RECOVERY!! Cold day in Hell and all that. BTW, thanks, BoD! Very re-assuring. If this is you way to "return share-holder value" or turn around for a "recovery play" I am disappointed, to be honest..

""Have you even reviewed the stream of rns's from IIs who have come on board/ increased their holdings? "" OK, that's a good point and I'll be honest, no, I haven't. But if I had would the share price have risen? That's MY point, I own shares HERE. I AM concerned about perceived (by me) lack of leadership and direction HERE I will have a look, it will have to be later as I like to kid myself I have important work to do..... Thanks for the tip BTW, but I am never going to just accept what I see happening here as good management by our "illustrious" BoD, as far as I am concerned WTG are doing a lousy job for WTG and a little more assertiveness and a higher profile would be a step in the right direction.

""The BOD should be more pro-active to keep investors on-board. its part of their job remit. even Rob Terry tried to shore up the SP by buying shares. oh wait a minute he sold them. well you get my point though."" Certainly I do. No, we don't want to return to the days of issuing an RNS because the cleaner has dusted a bookshelf but come on, there is a happy medium! (And this ain't it!) The truth is that at the moment SFO and S and G are MERELY background noise and won't become a main event until later, they are having no real effect on the running of the company, but shareholders here have become like frightened rabbits in the headlights, completely misled by events that are, at the moment, of little or no significance. (Rabbits in the headlights often do that) As for stories of "growing the company", humph (As they used to say in the Beano) 1) Where's the evidence? 2) Why doesn't the market believe it? Oh, and three, just for the devilment 3) Are you telling me you are content with this present performance? People on both sides here need to wake up. IMO, GLA, Have a nice day (Watch your wealth diminish)

""True grumpy, we wait and watch. Nothing can be done until SGH and then SFO concluded."" I disagree. These are trading companies with income and expenditure, going up or going down, contracts won or lost, assets changing, liabilities altering etc. Actually, IMO, plenty can be done.

Would they care to admit that Beachpoint Capital have paid an over-inflated price for their shares, or is there a GOOD reason for buying? I can't suggest DEFINITES, I don't have a clue what is going on, thanks to the positive leadership demonstrated so far,but there should be somebody who knows something POSITIVE about this shower? Perhaps not. This will keep falling until somebody has the intelligence to turn sentiment. Frankly, I can't do it.

When are you going to do something (anything!) to stop it?

""If the earliest to go to court is 2019... Then it also means that anytime before 2019 the SFO might declare fraud unfound and the sp will shoot skyhigh...."" The SFO and the S & G cases are seperate and in no way inter-dependant, they even deal with different time periods as I understand it. S & G will almost certainly be unaffected by what the SFO find as S & G's case is concerned with how WTG was presented to them as a viable business and its true valuation. As such if it can be proven it was a viable business, even if the SFO find fraud at QPP, it does not help S & G in any way. Similiarly, even if the SFO announce no fraud it doesn't alter S & G's claim that the the PSD was "incorrectly" presented. This will take a long time and the good thing about that is that it is impossible to value the company and its assets accurately during this period, providing, hopefully, some protection from a take over on the cheap. However, due to the prolonged time-scale of on-going events I am hanging on for my 10pps bargain! (Yes, anybody using logic can say, "Why 10p? Why not 5p... or 2p?" and they are right, but I picked 10p because I like the sound of it and my extensive, in-depth knowledgeable ongoing research, based on the massive information, regularly provided by the hard-working BoD, leads me to believe it would be quite a bargain and any way, the way things are going..... it just might happen, whereas 5p or 2p? Call me a pessimist if you must, but NO WAY!)

Good research, thanks. E-mail the boss (whoever he is at the moment) and ask if you can right the RSn's. I'd asck myselff but I makk tooo many mistooks. BTW folks, Total does actually have previous history and seems genuine, but then again who doesn't? GLA.