Member Info for A_E_Marsh

Doriemus PLC - OGA approval for drilling of Lidsey-X2 development well PR Newswire London, August 9 9 August 2017 Doriemus Plc ("Doriemus" or the "Company") OGA approval for the drilling of Lidsey-X2 development well Doriemus (NEX: DOR) is pleased to announce that the operator of the Lidsey onshore oil field, Angus Energy Plc (“Angus Energy”), have advised that it has today received permission from the UK Oil and Gas Authority (“OGA”) to drill and than produce from the Lidsey-X2 horizontal production well at its Lidsey production oil field, license PL 241. Importantly, Angus Energy has now obtained all regulatory consents to drill and produce Lidsey-X2. Today’s announcement follows the required approvals already received from the West Sussex County Council (“WSCC”) and the Environmental Agency (“EA”) as stated in the Company’s announcement of of 18 April 2017 and 2 May 2017 . The Lidsey Oil Field is located near Bognor Regis in the south of the United Kingdom . Lidsey-X2 production will target the upper crest of the producing Great Oolite reservoir. It passes through the Kimmeridge layers allowing for the detailed logging and sampling of drill cuttings. This data will be analysed and compared to the encouraging results at Brockham-X4Z. The Company notes its timeline for Lidsey-X2 to re-commence production from Lidsey has been delayed by a few weeks due to the extension of BDF Rig 28’s current work obligations for an unrelated third party. These modified operations have therefore slightly postponed the equipment mobilisation date to the Lidsey oil field. The Company expects an operating window of approximately six weeks from the rescheduled mobilisation date to actual production from Lidsey-X2. David Lenigas, Doriemus’s Chairman, commented; “ This is excellent news for the Company and the development of the Lidsey-X2 production well aligns well with Dorioemus’s stated focus of becoming a significant convention onshore oil producer.” Interest in the Lidsey Oil Field (PL 241): Doriemus owns a 20% direct interest in the onshore Lidsey Oil Field (PL 241) which has the right under the 21 November 2013 Farm-Out Agreement, to own 30% of the next well on the Lidsey Oil Field. This next well is the proposed Lidsey-X2 well. The directors of the Company accept responsibility for the contents of this announcement. This announcement contains inside information for the purposes of Article 7 of EU Regulation 596/2014. For further information, please contact: Doriemus Plc www.doriemus.com David Lenigas (Executive Chairman) +44 (0) 20 74400640 Hamish Harris (Non-Executive Director) Peterhouse Corporate Finance Limited +44 (0) 20 7469 0930 Guy M

""Go troll some other stock"" He can't, he loves us too much!

""He and a few others, you included, are incapable of responding to a post without making it personal"" Thanks, you are too kind! (Hope I haven't made that too personal for you.) DO'H!

""Rocal and addicknt have always posted negative views on this board, from my recollection neither of them hold any shares but often like to have their 2 pennies worth."" They appear to be locked in the mentality of attention seeking 5 year old's. I chose to ignore them, There are very few comments on this board now that deal with the present, we seem to be either hand-wringing about doubt over the future, (tell me what company hasn't got that problem, if you wish to look for it hint: Do not say, "Shell Oil") or harking back years ago about rubbish that is no longer pertinent. Really, not worth the effort. Meanwhile the factual news, holdings RNS's, passes by mainly unobserved. Just for old times, "Ooooh, RT! Rt this, RT that and RT the other...."

I can't help but think if your concern was sincere you would be contacting the company to ask your questions rather than posting negativity on this web-site. Your implied statement that there was an "excuse" when there clearly was not seems to vindicate my belief .

""there is no excuse for losing your cfo."" (To help jog your memory, which seems a little weak on the matter, here is the relevant RNS..... Directorate change AudioBoom (AIM: BOOM), the leading spoken word audio on-demand platform, announces that David McDonagh has left the Company with immediate effect. Malcolm Wall, Chairman of the Company, commented: "I would like to thank David for his efforts and contributions over the past two years.") So please tell me, who made an "excuse"? What was the "excuse" given? The Board will commence the recruitment process for a new Chief Financial Officer.) Thanks.

You're right on most of it, but it was a 1 - 10 consolidation, ( 10 for 1 is a dilution)meaning that in comparison to the old it is now about 9p! "".... less than the £1 some expected if i recall...." Yes, I was one of those "some" and not happy about it.

We will have to agree to differ. As usual. I have said nothing that I feel is incorrect or inaccurate, for example, just what was the percentage vote in favour of the sell again? I forget the exact figure... Was it over 98% or over 99%? ;-) http://www.cityam.com/213954/quindell-share-price-investors-vote-favour-slater-gordon-deal Anyway these discussions about years passed by are about as useful as the discussions about a few years time! I'm off to see the usual lack-lustre performance by Hamilton that he is giving this year every other race (I do love to live in the present!) Hamilton really does need to learn to focus, he is too old for stupid mistakes and too talented to allow himself to get beaten by team-mates. Get down to work, Lewis! "I've got blisters/vibrations/degradation on my tyres". "Copy".

We will have to agree to differ. BTW, I am still against the sale. The fact that S & G have clowned it up has no bearing on the potential they (appear to have) acquired, IMO. I also am less impressed than you with the present BoD, as you may have seen.

""....somebody is propping,"" I would think that it is possibly one, two or more of the wealthy funds that have been responsible for the 20 plus Holdings RNS's in the past few months.

"" I was one of very few shareholders that supported selling that part of the business."" I think you are not recalling that correctly. I was strongly against selling and as I remember was one of only two, Bordersman was the other person who felt the same way, IIRC. We received a lot of criticism for it so I do recall it clearly. Apart from that everybody else wanted the sale.

""AEM, I am not sure where to start with a reply.."" No, I understand, I felt the same yesterday reading your post. I have read your post and agree with most of it. Week -End of rain to "enjoy".

I have only written this because you seem to expect some comment from me. You won't get the comment you want though. ""Can we all WAKE UP? THAT STATEMENT ALONE IS RUDE (AND YOU NEED TO APOLOGIZE)."" When (certain) posters here are constantly harping on about the minor details that are being ignored by wealthy financial institutions I see a bit of a shaking up as exactly what is needed. I have had a go at giving it. You appear to have ignored the message however so why not ignore the "rudeness" too? By the way, you are offended? I deliberately said "we" to include myself and I am not offended. In fact I included myself twice in that post to make it clear to anybody with a brain I was not being rude. Omlettes and eggs and all that. You are actually "in" WTG in a very small way though... aren't you? A couple of years wringing your hands with your brow furrowed tensely in worry might take the price down nicely and nobody will even suspect you, will they? Well. one person might! I appear to be the one defending the share price now...... I haven't actually read all of your post, I believe my original post was relevant and accurate and your reply re-enforced what I had said because you took umbrage and have leapt to defend your ego but totally missed the message. For your own reasons, of course. I am sure you are genuine and most of what I say is not applicable to you. But there is no way I owe you or anybody else here anything. Finally, if you feel you have a case complain to LSE, if they agree they will take it down and you can carry on bleating endlessly about the SFO and S & G. I expect everybody else here will be grateful to you for that, but I can assure you, I won't.

10p? Yes, but it was a qualified statement as you well know and you have certainly made that statement our of context, your implied meaning is simply not true but.... do you genuinely believe it is possible? You have provided no alternative... If you do, let me point out THAT is not MY fault!! Rude? You don't know me very well. Interesting that you have effectively chosen to ignore my comments. I take that as subliminal proof that you have no actual answers. Is it that you now see you are wrong to bleat endlessly about that? Good if so, as prosperous funds seem to be at odds with you on that one too. I think a few people would like you to say an answer to how low you think the sp will go.

"Why did he leave so abruptly?" If you care so much why don't you ask somebody who can answer the question instead of asking here?

....the one who slept for twenty years? """""....considering that the court case vs SGH may very well take a number of years to reach any conclusion..."" Really, I'm genuinely not trying to be rude, I'm on the side of investors here, so please.. Can we all WAKE UP? That is EXACTLY why it is irrelevant and serious investors are not concerned about it! It doesn't matter... years and years time .... yeah.. it will matter, but this is NOW. Tell me Dar-, how far in that "number of years" are you imagining the sp to drop here? FORGET the SFO, FORGET S & G. LOOK AT WTG! NOW! (BTW Thanks goldust88, so rare to see such understanding of the potential here, just locked in unremitting negativity.. from SHAREHOLDERS, yeah, I've been as bad sometimes. 23awel makes a good point too) The theory here at the moment is that you can buy shares and get paid 4pps for doing it! Almost exactly like last time! OK? So if the legal issues are relevant So is that!! 4pps.... Now, who is the bright spark who will warn "there is a risk"? Before they do that will they please point us in the direction that there is no risk? Thanks. I'm off to lie down in a cold shower with a bottle of gin and teaspoonful of tonic water.

""£50k buy at bargain conditions. How did they manage that I wonder!"" There is a market size here of "2000". Unless you are a "snout", of course.

https://www.ingenie.com/what-our-customers-say?utm_source=bing&utm_medium=cpc&utm_campaign=B-%20Brand%20Phrase&utm_term=ingenie%20reviews&utm_content=B-%20Ingenie%20Reviews%20Phrase

Strange how the 5 star rating is at the bottom of the review..... Looks to me like a gang of "friends" helping each other out. As they say, don't believe everything on the internet.

today's round of grinding and unremitting misery is over? No U/T again. Oh well, more of the same tomorrow as Mukergee energetically "returns shareholder value"! This is just like having RT in charge again. Anybody else remember those two weeks before Christmas a while back (2015?) when the SP dropped by double-digit percentages everyday? Although to be fair at least RT tried to turn sentiment on occasion. Nothing so common from the current incumbent.