Member Info for A_E_Marsh

Are you in Trondheim? Knowing how you Liverpudlians are such light-hearted, easy-going, tolerant, un-pompous, humble, generous, kind, caring fellows, this looks like a place you might like to visit.... https://www.trondheim.com/tusseloypa Every dog has its day. BTW, I'm off to Goodwood for the Revival this week-end, I shall be going in an old Mazda, do You have any good suggestions for ME? Too busy???? Well I'm off now for a while, back to reality for me, which is today, not three years time. I'll check in later. Keep smiling, old friend.

LOL. what took so long????? You may suggest what you like and I will do the same, here goes. I suggest you start trying to be honest, it will make a nice change. Right, now give me FACTS... You are failing magnificently at the moment, through your own hand, not mine What LAW changed in 2014 that affects WTG? (I see THAT comment disappeared rather quickly....) Come on, facts now. You haven't got any though, have you? That is why you are trying to belittle a post that showed how shallow and econimical with the truth your comment was. Yes, LOTS of laws changed in 2014, didn't they? But you IMPLIES a specific law that would affect WTG was changed.. come on, let's have the details... That was your claim yesterday, perhaps you should get off that high horse, before you fall and hurt yourself. When you post with genuine, evidential proof you will earn respect, and at the moment you may need it, don't forget, we go back a long way and I was tired of your attempts at deceit in your first incarnation. I didn't bother with the rest of your post as I know that, at the moment, well, you complete the rest. What was it? "Read the Companies act 2006..." LOL..... I do wish we were face to face, I could then explain in my normal forthright and open way why I don't need to, I would be banned here for doing it!

This ....... ""f) The offending is not recent in nature, and the company in its current form is effectively a different body to that which committed the offences. For example it has been taken over by another company, it no longer operates in the relevant industry or market, all of the culpable individuals have left or been dismissed, or corporate structures or processes have been changed in such a way as to make a repetition of the offending impossible.""" .........is STILL applicable! Here is my proof, http://www.cps.gov.uk/legal/a_to_c/corporate_prosecutions/ Scroll down to, ""Additional public interest factors against prosecution:"" Glad to be of service! Now, that "law change" you were referring to earlier is.....?

""I'm not sure how old those CPS guidelines are but:the law changed in 2014,"" Law changes all the time. What law are you referring to? BTW, the smoke dissipated years ago, sorry and all that. Yes the SFO ar still investigating, that isn't exactly anything new, nor is any of this...my old Mazda still works, you still post on this forum, etc, etc...

The quote was not mine originally but came from a poster called (IIRC) Legelese and I have copied it here many, many times. I expect to be able to provide you with the opportunity to read it again on a few occasions in the future too!

Funny how some are only too quick to bleat that this will drag on for years and then act like it is imminent! Here is why I feel WTG will not suffer.. Matters to be taken into consideration in establishing that it is not in the public interest to prosecute a corporate entity "(f) The offending is not recent in nature, and the company in its current form is effectively a different body to that which committed the offences. For example it has been taken over by another company, it no longer operates in the relevant industry or market, all of the culpable individuals have left or been dismissed, or corporate structures or processes have been changed in such a way as to make a repetition of the offending impossible." Taken from the CPS guidelines.

""i think the guy buying before me needs to change his broker."" Maybe not, I was going to do a post last night about the pathetically small market size here, 2,000 is just unreal. If you got a good deal be grateful, it doesn't mean everybody else will get one!

Not rise much today? OK, but I'll settle for five and a quarter per cent per day for the next 200 consecutive trading days, and personally shake the hand of IM to congratulate him.... if he'd let me!

We could try magic.....Astrology, Mercury is retrograde until early September and then goes into its "shadow period" until about the 19th. Failing that perhaps that tea-lady could start using loose leaf instead of tea-bags and tell us our fortune. Or perhaps old sayings? "Sell in May (TOO LATE!) and go away and come back on Ledger Day", which is the 2nd of October I believe.

"Now all we need is a tick up to around 5000.00 so people can get a profit back..." It certainly feels that way doesn't it? After all this has appeared to me to be a very long and managed decline in the share price despite claims from the BoD to the contrary. Pre the attack this was QPP at 44p. Since then there was a one for fifteen consolidation which puts the equivalent price at 660p. This has further been consolidated at one for ten making the equalised price 6600. (Yes.. £66.00!) A 90 per cent sell off reduced the prospect to 660p again and a 90p return (BIG DEAL! Look at what we "lost") takes the price to 570p. I have in recent correspondence seen the sell off as 80 per cent, but I am using all quotes given at the point in time that they applied.. BTW... Whine, whine whine......

You may just get a non-specific, un-named, oblique snide remark for that, you know!

It could be "very different" in an alternative way. After all, in a family of 6 people 5 might have listened, which is also very different to 50 per cent, but in a positive way.

It is easy to argue with some conviction that by their very nature, any regular contributor to this forum is repetitive. However, perhaps the blame for that on the WTG page, lies with an apparently somnolent BoD. They are supposed to be leaders. When we see change I suspect so will they. Until that happy(?) state of affairs we will produce what they have produced, the same old same old. I feel no guilt whatsoever for that. Perhaps, as you have claimed to be buying in at several stages in the recent past when this was well above 100p, you might like to speculate on the share price by October? Or how this current long-term silent strategy might be perceived as "returning shareholder value"? I think we would all like to know how the present performance, that is now quite long in the tooth considering its notable lack of success, would be deemed acceptable by any "investor". Personally I fear a back door plan to get us to accept this level so that a rival company can take over what should be a very strong company at an unreasonably low price. So to me it is important to "whine, whine, whine", just to keep some pressure on them. I am an investor here and I have that right. As an aside I dread to think what training the new bloke is getting!

As we had two previous blue trading days that equated to nearly a rise of one penny in the hare price I was expecting a 6 per cent drop yesterday. It has become the pattern that is known here as "returning shareholder value". I do hope IM's pay packet is in good health.

I'm going to stop asking rhetorical questions. I mean, what's the point?

""can't wait to see sp by Christmas"" What year?

""It is unfortunate that the share price has now fallen below 90p and until positive news (or any news) the sp will continue to slide."" Quite. But let's not shout about it, I wouldn't want to wake IM up.

Dor has its day.

Trolls are filtered. Hope you are well. ATB

Hmm, few things there I've never (expletive deleted) done. I mean... "been to EASTBOURNE", come ON! True story now, I saw Paloma Faith in concert in Bournemouth, she said "Hands up everybody here who is old!". Nobody put their hands up and all looked perplexed, she carried on, "Bournemouth... isn't that full of old people?" A few muttered, "no." and she said, "Oh,well!" I realised afterwards she had confused Bournemouth with Eastbourne! So Wot?