Member Info for A_E_Marsh

""No guarantees whatsoever on that, but that is the gamble we all took."" Yes, that's right. So you were expecting people to be overflowing in their effusive enthusiasm if they lose money? Why? As I understand it investments may go up or down. Why would any body expect happiness when/if they go down? After all, you have already admitted you are expecting joy if they go up!! ""Never ceases to amaze me what a fickle lot us pi's are."" Nothing to do with "fickle", simply a reflection of reality. "Oh, I've lost 5K this week, I'm so happy!" Or "Oh, I've made 5K this week, I'm so miserable". "Fickle".... HA! I'm not fickle and I now feel the need to explain I am not stupid either. Apologies if I seem short tempered it's just that pointing out the bleedin' obvious always makes me that way.

Your implied speculation could well be right, I certainly hope so. It is difficult to see any other reason for yesterday's double RNS's. A shame we didn't keep yesterday's early gains but I hope that was proof of the potential boiling quietly here. As always, we shall see.

I've just seen that the contact number is included on the RNS. Usual to know for later How very strange that the link I have posted included the details of the first RNS about the S & G case. If you made it up no one would believe it.

http://www.4-traders.com/WATCHSTONE-GROUP-PLC-16772128/news/Watchstone-Change-of-Registered-Office-25628638/

""Seen most of it already and not that impressed"" If only I had put my money into Bitcoin instead of Quindell... I'd be bluddy impressed with that!

*"prior".. curse this Secondary Modern education!

Lindoser, I was considering 'phoning them. I am pleased to see the HQ address already changed on the web-site but no number, I shall think about it. I wonder where the problem lies. WTG do have a little "proir" where RNS's are concerned! On a (very) personal note, as a former inmate of Petersfield County Secondary Modern I am delighted to see Watchstone return to its county of origin! (BTW, from "Almost bizarre" to genuinely bizarre... If you live long enough you'll see everything!)

I will be informed that it has been discussed previously but does anybody understand today so far. I mean..... WTFlip?

Same as ever, down five per cent, all normal territory and apparently we are lucky enough to have another two years of this yet. You may notice some rather irritable posters here, I can't think why. Only another 20 days of this and we shall be at 0p! :-) I'll mop up! PS. Try not to discuss anything here, it's all been said before....

Well I will be right or wrong won't I? Either way I am prepared to speculate.. I did say "assumed". I am sure you will be quick to acknowledge if I am correct.

"..it has been discussed previously.." No it hasn't, if you read my post carefully. I am talking about yesterday's RNS, not historical stuff. There have been many holdings RNS since the last "discussion", whenever that was, it was long ago enough that I can't remember.

I am assuming the major shareholder for the latest RNS is Sand Grove Capital Management therefore Watchstone should update their list shortly.

That major financial institutions constantly announce more and more ownership of this company and the fact passes by without even any comment! I genuinely cannot remember so many such events, especially so often, on any other company I have known. How well I recall lectures from "experienced" share holders that "no II will buy into a company like this on AIM, it is not on their horizon!" and suchlike pontifications. Plenty are seeing it now.

"Glowing in the dark..." Is it?

""However you failed to answer the question."" Exactly what part of "you have missed the point" are you failing to grasp here? I will explain further, your question is irrelevant as it does not address the raison d'etre of this site. You are effectively changing, or more accurately perhaps, narrowing, the subject to make it suit only what you want. That aim is in conflict with my ambition, both of which are kindly provided by this site Your irrelevant question deserves no answer and will get no answer. Here we go again ( but more blatant this time, for your benefit)... this service is NOT provided soley to ramp shares. It is provided... I'll tell you what, YOU read MY last post and this time try to understand. It is actually simple enough. ""You should be ashamed of yourself."" Stop judging others, you appear poorly qualified, and look in a mirror, you might see a person fitting the description you are accusing others of. After that you might find a definition of the word "truth" difficult but enlightening. (BTW, don't forget everybody's truth is different... now, I think you're really going to struggle with THAT one....)

As you appear to require an answer, "no". Indeed, the SFO "findings" could be that WTG has moved so much from QPP that the problems of Quindell no longer affect Watchstone in any meaningful way. A lot of people have actually moved on from QPP. Just some old investors left now with a chip on their shoulder, irrelevant in truth, but they just haven't realised. If I am wrong, OK, I'm wrong, but I don't imagine any of them acknowledging the fact if I am, as is more probable, proven right.

""AEMarsh no I still don't..." I am not surprised. I though you would find it difficult to grasp. ""I'm looking forward to this answer."" You are, as is always the case with the myopic, totally missing the point. Let me help you understand. This site is NOT provided merely for people out to extol the virtues and ignore the problems, nor even to post only comments you agree with or that fit the tight confines of your wishes for your financial future.. It is provided to anybody with in the web-site criteria (Not professional etc,), investor or not, (I have been in here years, thank you very much) to post any comment they feel relevant, and that is acceptable within the rules and law, whether you actually like it or not. Glad to be of service, your new broad-minded understanding will improve the place enormously. ""Could be quite amusing" I do hope you have been amused, although, as you appear so good at missing the point I better explain to you, I am not here to provide your entertainment.

"".....im sure they are working hard to fix..."" Some of the (understandable) cynicism here is caused,frankly, because long term investors have been, over the years, able to see that "hard work" has not always been a top-priority ethic at Dor! But I am happy for newer investors who are completely unaware of this fact.....

""Not sure how venting it here serves your own best interests but if it works for you then fine."" Pdub, if you didn't understand that before then you should by now!

""How much do you think they will generate?" I'm not convinced that "thought" is a part of his process here, to be honest.