RE: News void18 Jan 2020 17:42
Agreed Jersey,
People need to relax - read back over the old RNS's and watch/listen to the interviews.
Havieron is going to be the short term but I'm as excited for the first drilling campaign at Scallywag - hopefully we might get an update soon on the plans for that. Look at these excerpts from two old RNS
Havieron MMI Results from 6th December 2017 - https://polaris.brighterir.com/public/greatland_gold/news/rns/story/w6ek0gr
"Peak MMI responses over Havieron were 4ppb silver, 70ppb arsenic, 25ppb gold, 834ppb cerium, 710ppb copper, 53ppm iron, 284ppb lanthanum, 860ppb lead and 112 ppb uranium."
MMI Results from Scallywag Target from 23rd October 2018 -
https://polaris.brighterir.com/public/greatland_gold/news/rns/story/xpyvo3x
"MMI results from Scallywag display discrete elevated gold, copper, silver and arsenic MMI responses along the western parts of the target area over a strike length of some 6km. Supporting pathfinder elements of cerium, lanthanum, iron, lead and uranium are also coincident along this trend with several clusters of samples displaying a strong multi element response. Highest results returned from MMI sampling were 8ppb silver, 50ppb arsenic, 0.4ppb gold, 480ppb cerium, 2750ppb copper, 33ppm iron, 280ppb lanthanum, 240ppb lead and 335ppb uranium. Response of certain groupings (or suites) of elements over parts of the Scallywag target are similar to those seen in MMI and drill core from the Havieron prospect."
Nearly 4 times the highest Cu response from Scallywag as Havieron and it is a much shallower target.
It's easy to see why RIO will be keeping a close eye on proceedings here - GLA Paddy