Member Info for 15LIVES

Thanks for the reply, Testpack.

Testing is indeed the key.

Time shall tell what transpires, but I can't see monies for testing being paid by anyone other than a large multinational. And, as you say, convincing commerciality has to come from Powerhouse.

I think National Hydrogen providing monies is dead in the water.

They are a start up company with no update on their own financing, backed by United Hydrogen who themselves have provided no update on an IPO that was supposed to be finalised by now. Coupled with them being part of a hydrogen conglomerate, from which Powerhouse are now downplaying as part of their activities, I can't help but feel this is leaving Powerhouse now floundering somewhat.

I see Powerhouse having to raise finance themselves to prove technology at full scale.

You place a lot of faith in Howard White, Castle.

For your sake I hope it's not misplaced.

Castle

Guidelines don't allow you to produce pollutants and in doing so class it as net zero.

Only electrolysis from renewable sources of power are categorised as green hydrogen.

Castle

How will it be net zero if it's burning syngas to keep the kiln at temperature?

Scooby

Because if your example car ran on the energy it produced and in doing so created carbon monoxide, it wouldn't be able to be marketed as non polluting.

At the risk of speaking over Glenhoss - apologies if I am Glenhoss - this is what I questioned a while back.

Whilst the pyrolysis process itself creates no emissions, in order to get the kiln up to and sustained at temperature requires the burning of the syngas produced by the pyrolysis process.

When syngas is burned it produces carbon monoxide.

This is what could cause planners, environmentalists and local residents to see it as incineration.

On the back of a previous Powerhouse planning application being withdrawn it can't be ignored.

However, and not you Scooby, when I did mention it a while back all I got was the usual troll and deramper accusations thrown at me.

Patxaran

Shell are focusing on green hydrogen. IE electrolysis.

Last month they made a FID to purchase 100 megawatts of ITM's Trident electrolyser stacks for their Refhyne II project, which shall produce 44,000 kilograms of green hydrogen daily when up and running in 2027.

It's happening now.

Hydrogen is where the money is at over the next decade.

Powerhouse are too far behind the curve regarding hydrogen. Their input, if any, shall be inconsequential.

Getting rid of waste plastic is / should be their focus.

Have a good day, Castle.

Happy hunting.

Any chance I could borrow your brain, Castle?

Only I'm building myself an idiot.

Dusty

But you look at things objectively.

And that's vital to surviving when investing.

Jancux

What I get out of the forum is research in order to protect my wealth and to make it grow as much as I possibly can.

I do this by engaging with other posters who are articulate, insightful and who look at Powerhouse objectively. Posters such as Testpack, Red Hornet, Scoobydriver, Dusty and 30Silver et al. Posters who are open to persuasion and who, in turn, cause me to question things I may not have done so already by bringing to the table their experiences and knowledge. But as Newton's third law of motion states: ' For every action, there's an equal and opposite reaction', and that's where the likes of Castle and Swazers come in.

Insulting and abusive you said I was, Castle.

News today you said.

And you post that lol.

Grow up.

But I'm sure it's going to go down, Dusty.

So surely that's a strong sell.

Swazers

This is a sincere post in an attempt to try to bridge the divide between our opinions.

For a long time now I, amongst others, have been saying the share price shall fall to below 1p. Been saying that since it was much higher. One of the reasons given was our questioning of United and National Hydrogen. We pulled apart their business set up and whether they would deliver on their promise, backed up by Emmitt. You, amongst others, said the complete opposite. Yet, here we are, with you criticising us.

Now, if the roles were reversed, I'd been saying, or at least thinking to myself, hang on, I may not have liked what these guys said, but so far they've called it correct.

That's what I can't understand about you and Castle. You just keep on ploughing through with your heads down.

All this talk about trolls, bots and us working for someone to bring the share price down is just ridiculous. I tell you what, I like the job I actually do, but if I could make a living sitting behind a computer posting about companies on bulletin boards I'd take it. Especially at my time of life lol.

Dusty

I am indeed unsure about funding / contracts and would like some clarity on what exactly it is Emmitt et al are expecting financially from United / National Hydrogen as, to me at least, they are wholly different propositions.

And yes, I am, and always have been, a potential investor.

However, the strong sell indicator isn't chosen lightly. At this price, given the lack of news and cash burn, I feel it's apt.

Hi Dusty

I agree there are differences between various sites etc which display share prices. As there was I think yesterday when it dipped to 0.99p triggering my headline SUB ONE PENNY.

It's why I made a point of wording my post 'Except they've closed here at 1p'.

I wouldn't usually jump on anyone and be so pedantic, but with Swazers I made an exception.

Castle/ Swazers

You two make me laugh.

You're typical of people who cannot stand others having a different opinion to yours, and are unable to do anything other than shout out your opinions whilst sticking your fingers in your ears.

It's a bulletin board for heavens sake!

It's purpose is to discuss Powerhouse Energy!

I've told you what to do if you believe I have two accounts, Castle. I've even given you the e mail address to report me. How much more research do you want me to do for you? Do you need me to wipe it for you too lol.

And what on earth do you mean by not keeping to the facts?

Care to elaborate?

You've posted tonight that there shall be news tomorrow. You don't know that. There may well be. But you don't know that. And you accuse me of not keeping to the facts.

You're like two little children who can't get their own way. If you need to believe that I and others are trolls working to discredit Powerhouse because it fits your narrative and agenda then go for it. And as for your pathetic quote about hoping to bump into us at the test centre lol.

If I do or don't trade Powerhouse then that's my decision. It's not illegal or against the rules. If either of you posts something stupid like the shares are 1.10p when on the very post they state it the price is 1p I'll call it out.

Of course I browse through the posts on your other investments too. It's called doing research. Research isn't just about looking at companies. I do it to shore up my comments on how stupid, misguided and inexperienced you both are generally.

I'm not here to be negative about Powerhouse for the sake of it. I believe they have great potential but that there are many questions that need to be asked. If, as investors, you're too fragile for your chosen companies to be questioned then you need to either keep away from the bulletin boards or keep away from the companies.

Except they've closed here at 1p.

If there is, Castle let's hope the shares perform better than your ENET shares did today on the back of their RNS today.

Blimey!

Gates on bouncy castles.

Whatever shall they think of next.

A fully global overview there, Testpack and pretty much in line with my own thinking regarding current and soon to be political happenings.

The only thing I would question is your reference to the LF being paid in advance. Question in the sense of whether it's likely to happen for DMG units not having been tested at full scale.

I see this as a major hurdle over which Powerhouse have to get before all those things in your first paragraph even become relevant for them.

Time shall tell.