Member Info for 13thmonkey

There will always be missed cases, that's just a part of the deal with testing, you could have someone who at that minute was below the threshold but 5mins later enough replication had take place to put them above. The unions need to do one, usual story of protecting the short term inaugural member by sacrificing everyone and the future. I've seen factories closed down because of that attitude from unions. And phe need to get a grip

Does aggreko do any green power? I know where I used to work sold them alternators. If they don't, they need to in order to survive imo.

Maybe we'll reach a higher price than shell, we'll be bigger than them then, it's only £2.36.

Quizzical, given your utter bs on the absolute share price being comparable, and your massive miss on the sp of BP and shell, I'm going to ignore anything to have to say about how people in the industry work as you clearly have no clue. If you're new at this and are trying to learn, that's great, listen, watch, learn, if you're confused then kindly spread less bs, we'll be able to grow crops soon.

Quizzical, BP shareprice, £2.58, shell £13.36, so not in the £25-30 range at all, not that the value of a single share actually means anything in the slightest.

That is big news and a money laundering nightmare.

Is Zeus independent or in house?

Profit taking, that's the risk they take.

PPS (used to be there) do release regular news of new orders, but have a really weird share structure where there is a pile of potential debt that constantly pushed down the line. I got out at 50p ish. A lot of their sales seen to be tech demonstrators, and I've never seen volume off the back of it. So PPS should be higher due to sales but countered by risk and lack of growth of their opportunities.

Thank f for that, he was a pita

Oh it's on the list. Personally I think it'll drop to about 50% of current price, however, and this is why it's mentioned here, I can see such synergies with dvrg that it is likely to be brought into the fold and getting in early enough should create a nice little bump in the portfolio, it'll play out over the next 2 years in my mind. I'm hoping for an Mcap more like 30m by the time it's brought in. Might make me overweight in dvrg but that's a nice problem to have because of how I got there.

I got into msys for the same reason and got out when I saw the incoming fund raise, no idea what that will do to the price, additional cash should offset the dilution but the market is fickle.

They told me that they were aware of the problems that HS2 has with regards to power. This is from sept last year.

Yes, we are aware of HS2, and its need to be seen as a sustainable construction project. We have spoken to a number of people already. There is of course a need for the construction industry to go round the loop itself before it arrives at the "AFC is the answer" point. Some of what you are seeing is the industry starting to question itself and that being played out in the public arena I think. It is not just the "diesel bill". We know there is huge pressure to deliver the project sustainably and especially around emissions.

That makes no sense as written. If its only 70pct accurate and the other 30% to get a second test, how do you know if you are actually negative or just an error in the test? Also assuming that it is actually 70% accurate would you trust someone's health to that?

Are any of the tests noted above actually approved for home use? Do you know how accurate they are in your usage model (honest question)? Given that they will have a certain level of accuracy would you risk a family member with that level of accuracy?

Because of the word nano, makes for great press.

BT would a huge boost and quickly, but that's just one string to this company, even without BT there's bucket loads of opportunity here, lots of growth potential in several different areas.

Formula e could be just mains power or local gensets, doesn't need to be anything special.

Those are reasonable thoughts, and that choice is, as they say, yours to make. I'm not going to try and argue you away from that position.

woodford...