Member Info for 13thmonkey

Sorry Seres, I'm also in fuel cells but not ceres.

From antman. https://twitter.com/online_antz/status/1368966019843231751?s=19
Ceres shelving their check point inhibitor, blaming covid which I find odd. Probably good news only time will tell.

Apologies that was uncalled for, hopefully taken as slightly humorous.

Ok you are between 90 and 95% likely to be a fwit. You'll be missed (0-5%)

Goldtrig, you are truly a fwit, at least you are consistent in that. Suggest you go and look into that test.
As I stated we have being sovereign on our side.

Pl75, couldn't recall the exact numbers, and the smaller numbers makes the range larger.

I've got a sub £1 average, been here for a while.
I suggest you take a stats course, this whole industry is built on stats, sample sizes of 30 are tiny, it would only take 1 extra result to knock the result down by 3%. that's why confidence intervals exist, so that comparisons can be made and so that the range of likely outcomes can be understood.
It's not a matter of honesty, it's almost dishonest to not give out the intervals.
For the record, I think we've a very good chance of being the better test, we're also sovereign.
You seem a bit dim tbh gold, so second thoughts don't bother trying to understand it.

Maybe, maybe not, the stats we've seen so far for specificity with our 30/30 results could be as low as 88% correct without that 30/30 being seen as being odd. The other result of 29/30 is between 82% and 99.9%. because their sample size is so much larger than our the range of those results is much smaller, so they could actually achieve a better result than us without either set of results being stated incorrectly at present.

Headquartered in Dublin?

You do understand that the 100% specifcity that we reported has a confidence interval around it that is proportional to the sample size (30?) So our 100% is actually 9n.m% to 100% taking into account confidence intervals. And our 96.9% is a range from somewhere below that number to somewhere above it. Confidence intervals are perfectly normal and should really be stated and they would come out better than ours by that measure as they have a greater sample size if the 140ish figure is correct.

Or deepverge's breath test also using affimers.

None of his areas of interest relate to hydrogen: http://www.eng.cam.ac.uk/profiles/dc29

There's plenty else to support the price, that's why I don't believe we should get hung up on the BT, rise we'll have the flash rise and crash we had last year.

https://www.linkedin.com/posts/rainer-klug_dr%C3%A4ger-schnelltest-f%C3%BCr-jedermann-wird-kommen-activity-6773164723262255104-3JPk

Hopefully not as close as we are, and don't seem to be using as close to standard components as we are, so scaling might be more difficult.

If BT comes then it comes, we shouldn't get into a frenzy about it, remember what happened last time?

But but but sometime in the past someone did something or the board didn't do something.

I'm not sure what you are trying to say, but would you take expect some Chinese site that sells random ship parts to have deepverges product listed? Are they even full size parts or toy parts?

Many many years ago during the dot-com boom I was working for a company that produced the alternator half of a diesel gender, we were warned that capacity needed to increase to meet the demand of hundreds of new data centres, we had consultants in, we drove towards more automation, and then it all fell apart. The parent company, making engines, had spent millions for not a single extra order. No idea why I'm saying it. But at the end of the day it's just e, it's just volts and amps. But for the miners probably more expensive volts and amps than from the grid. I'd be far more interested in grid scale products, they are less susceptible to a market drying up.

A strange set of companies, backs up the war footing kind of thinking.