Roundtable Discussion; The Future of Mineral Sands. Watch the video here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
Will copy and paste it in for you addicknt.
Solgold: a few things I infer from the last RNS: · “Management is internally evaluating a phased approach to the development of Cascabel with the intent to reduce upfront capital and shorten the development schedule.” & $25.4M shares held in a wholly owned subsidiary.
I don't use Twitter - what did hubris say?
I agree with hubrishunter.
Some interesting comments from a previously respected poster;
https://twitter.com/hubrishunter/status/1658109970938732546?t=DiRtr1ctZDS7jE9_FnW_zQ&s=19
😐
I'm sorry that you don't get a better read on my qualifications from my username, Gino, but short of sending you a facsimile of my degree certificates I'll have to live with the fact it doesn't "hack it" for you, lol. No sleep lost.
You're cute to read my posts. Don't be offended if I don't return the favour.
There are lots of ways to derive pleasure in life. Baiting idiots who think they understand their investment but then spout utter nonsense is just one sport I enjoy, and only ever fleetingly, you'll note.
Fact remains that no one has answered any of the questions I've set today. But don't hide behind the idea that the questions are beneath them, because they have replied. The truth is they know they agree with me, but they can't bring themselves to answer the questions truthfully and admit it. Now that's sad really!
Anyway, 'you do you', my lovely. Don't let me upset you x
AgArCu – I note your recent post and indeed the many others (66 at the last count) over the last 3 months, all on the SOLG BB and had pause to think about them. When talking purely about the current state of SOLG, you fall quite short on facts other than that there hasn't been a buyer for the company or it's assets. Er, I think we all here know that. The rest of your prose (vast majority!) seems to be ridiculing other posters for their points of view, making unsubstantiated claims about your scientific prowess (3 chemical symbols in a nom de plume doesn't hack it for me) or showing your aversion to the use of elipses, and as you don't seem to engender much appreciation here, I'm left wondering why you post so much vitriol so often? Surely you can find some other way to give yourself pleasure?
Sad really!
Just read the title of this. It's about as factually accurate as we've come to expect from the thick AF rampers... When was my first solg post? Be honest, BBG. Own your stupid.
Who put batteries in BBG? Yawn
Did you fellas get the deramping job on the same day? how cute...
Inevitable? Wow Pad, that is big talk. Care to put a time frame on it? And a price you think the board will find acceptable? I know the second one doesn't matter in the sort of TO you're dreaming of, but you seem so confident, so guess at a number.
If there is an inevitable TO soon at a price over today's SP, you'd be bonkers not to go all in on it. So again, have you sold the family home, and maybe taken out a big short term loan to acquire all the shares you can? Borrowed from close family? Advised your mates to go all in with you?
Of course not, because you're full of it, and know full well the inevitability you speak of is false. Accept that there's a good chance nothing will happen for a while and you won't need to spend precious time making up stuff about 'infestors'. Enjoy yourself, poppet x
The disruption is fast becoming more vociferous and desperate via multi-aliases as the inevitable takeover approaches.
SM, don't you think you and your cohorts are starting to look a bit silly now, how long can you be in denial,. It really is getting ridiculous, you must all know in the bottom of your hearts, we have all been shafted by mather. The ships long sailed mate, long sailed. All you have left are pads dittys and the the school bully's. Stop shooting the messengers. They're the ones who can see the writings on the wall.
Your stalking a bit early today padsy. Did we open the bottle a bit earlier. Perhaps you could highlight what points agau makes, are not nearer the mark than your £4 by Xmas. Look back on kalbari posts, makes a complete mockery of you mate. Dream on what might of been, dream on
Little pun around the future of the mining industry, Pad. I would have thought you could figure it out: your main contribution here seems to be one-liners and links to sponsored op eds?
For all the D swinging that takes place on this board, let me say one thing with absolute certainty: I know a bit more about chemistry than you. Thanks though poppet. x
AuArCu
The chemical symbol for gold is Au. Ar is argon.
Maybe your username should be Argon Selenium?
Guessing you haven't sold the family home, SM? So you share my doubts? And prove my point? What are your biggest concerns about Solg's current position?
Individuals writing on this board can't alter the share price, that's for sure.
We have enough cash to ride until June 2024... as long as we do absolutely nothing... and just hope Bob can get something done.. What a business plan!!
I'm sure no one here, just a couple of years ago, would have thought Cornerstone Group would be in control, and all our hopes for any pay day are with their friends...
AgArCu, don't you have other BBs to disrupt to fill your clients' orders? Or is that saved for your other moniker, 1981Investor?
Even by his own standards, the amount of attempted inuendo in Red's post (count the ellipses) is impressive.
Nothing fast and smart from Bob because he requires a buyer.
No bid because no one needs to. Majors and state-backed vehicles with deep pockets don't take pity on small caps. They almost always get them on the terms they want. Or they hoover up the pieces when they fail. Please don't lower yourself to a repetitive ramp about Noront, the one example of competitive tension anyone here seems capable of citing (in a diametrically opposed jurisdiction from ours, with proven mineral extraction).
Call it for what it is. An ambitious explorer that has been 'managed' in too many directions recently, and now has neither a credible bluff of financing and development, nor a clear road map to monetisation. Just Bob making claims about inflicting pain on companies for whom a 6x MCap takeout of solg would barely appear in their returns.
To those who say anyone with realistic concerns about the company should sell up and shouldn't post here, I say this: if you believe there's no truth in anything I say here then the risks must be vanishingly small. Please don't reply until you've sold the family home, moved into rented and invested the proceeds in solg, certain of a great return. If you haven't done this, it's because the offline, real-world version of you shares some of all of my doubts. And yet you're not selling.
Bozi 980 of fdyns 984 posts have been bile and abuse, the other 4 are on a par to bbg. let them dream of what might of been. and you keep posting your insightful posts.
Addict. sorry if I got it wrong. I was referring to red knights latest mind numbing posts. please accept my apologies, technology passed me by. but while im here.do you like me think it ironical, that im accused of being kalbari [should be double r ], by the night stalker.and yet a lot of what he posted is coming true, as I recall he disliked Mather, and the way the company was run. he also used to ridicule some of the ridiculous posts on here.so in retrospect, he was far more insightful than the night stalker. with his £4 by xmas.
"$500 million..." LOL
Thank you, DBW
“Copper/gold developer SolGold is evaluating a phased approach to the development of the Cascabel project, in Ecuador, with the aim of reducing upfront capital and shortening the development schedule.
SolGold also deferred the Cascabel definitive feasibility study and the Porvenir preliminary economic assessment, owing to the fluidity of the current capital cost landscape and the ongoing assessment of value-enhancing opportunities.
The company is prioritising capital allocation as part of a reorganisation plan, which also aims to reduce costs and headcount, to preserve financial resources while derisking Cascabel.
“SolGold plans to provide an update as the various value-adding options are evaluated and a clearer picture of the future direction of the studies and timeframes emerges,” it said in its management discussion and analysis accompanying its 2023 third-quarter report.
Regarding the ongoing strategic review, SolGold said that it was continuing to evaluate financing alternatives, including potentially spinning out non-Cascabel assets.
During the second quarter, SolGold completed a $500-million royalty financing with Osisko Gold Royalties in relation to the copper and gold project. The company also successfully raised $36-million by issuing 180 000 new ordinary shares to investors, including Jiangxi Copper. “