focusIR May 2024 Investor Webinar: Blue Whale, Kavango, Taseko Mines & CQS Natural Resources. Catch up with the webinar here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
Hi Adam
I would love to, but I have recently had two of my post removed that someone reported, (thankfully no midnight post so far) and would face a ban on the next reported post.
------------------------------
I see that Ash Patel, has left Sycurio
ITDS Managed Services’ Post
View organization page for ITDS Managed Services
ITDS Managed Services
1,069 followers
2d
We are excited to announce & welcome leading tech support specialist, Ash Patel to its expanding team.
Ash joins ITDS Managed Services as IT & Service Desk Manager and heads the sales and customer service team based in Crawley.
Read more here:
https://lnkd.in/eGswUCnf
https://www.linkedin.com/posts/itds-managed-services_we-are-excited-to-announce-welcome-leading-activity-7142466877930315777-MYwH
IT & Service Desk Manager
ITDS Managed Services
Dec 2023 - Present 1 month
Crawley, England, United Kingdom
--------------------
Sycurio
7 years 10 months
Head Of Global Support Operations (UK & US)
Mar 2021 - Nov 2023 2 years 9 months
United Kingdom
- Experienced and results-oriented professional with a proven track record in leading global support operations for multinational organizations. Adept at developing and implementing strategic initiatives to enhance customer satisfaction, optimize support processes, and drive operational excellence. Skilled in managing cross-functional teams, fostering collaboration, and delivering exceptional service quality across diverse regions and cultures
- Extensive experience leading support
Support Manager (UK & AUS)
Feb 2020 - Mar 2021 1 year 2 months
Guildford, United Kingdom
Support Team Leader
May 2016 - Jan 2020 3 years 9 months
Guildford, United Kingdom
Technical Support Engineer
Feb 2016 - May 2016.. 4 months
Guildford, United Kingdom
https://uk.linkedin.com/in/ash-patel-90872b11
-----------------------------------------------
June 04 2023
Sycurio
Sycurio’s senior leadership team work to deliver the strategy set by our board and manage all operational aspects of the company, globally.
Ash Patel
Customer Care
Ash heads up Customer Care at Sycurio, a team of dedicated support professionals who deliver exceptional customer experiences and the best in customer service.
https://web.archive.org/web/20230604082329/https://sycurio.com/about/senior-leadership-team
Hi Adam
As the document is 37 pages long, written in legalese and costs a mere $5, why don’t you do yourself what you ask Victor to do? He does enough for this board without being asked to do unpaid work for other people.
Hi Victor - please could you let me know what that document says and what it means in simple English?!?
Thanks!
Interest… that’s the crucial word here. For the first time in this whole ridiculous saga, Sycurio are under time pressure.
Uesday, December 19, 2023
95... 37 pgs order Order Tue 12/19 3:02 PM
CLAIMS CONSTRUCTION ORDER. This case is referred to Magistrate Judge Rodriguez for the entry of an appropriate Utility Patent Pretrial Order and Case Management Plan. Signed by District Judge Max O. Cogburn, Jr on 12/19/2023. (ams)
https://www.pacermonitor.com/public/case/41847299/Semafone_Limited
The Department for Work and Pensions: Secure Card Payment Services Procurement
A Pipeline Notice
by DEPARTMENT FOR WORK AND PENSIONS
Published 19 Dec 2023
Delivery
01 Sep 2024 to 31 Aug 2027
Deadline
01 Jan 1 00:00
Duration
3 year
Value
£6M-£13M
This is a follow up to the previous PIN 2023/S 000-004912 dated 17th of February and the subsequent PIN 2023/S 000-032248; dated 1st of November 2023, with regards to the provision of Secure Card Payment Services (SCPS) for the DWP. Following the completion of the review of the Request for Information responses, following the February PIN, the DWP is proceeding to procure these services. In the PIN of 1st November 2023 DWP had identified the intended issue date for the procurement as 2 January 2024. The estimated launch date is now on or around 29 January 2024. DWP's requirements for SIP Licences has also changed from 9,000 to 11,000, as set out below.
The current DWP provision allows business groups to receive customer payments in a Payment Card Industry, Data Security, Standard (PCI DSS) compliant manner, including an Interactive Voice Recognition (IVR) capability to facilitate payments. The DWP service and SCPS contract currently supports approximately 9000 agents. The current SCPS contract also includes the routing of outbound calls via the PCI DSS compliant service provider.
DWP takes approximately 750,000 card payments per annum, totalling approximately £130m per annum. This is collected by two areas of DWP and Northern Ireland's Department for Communities:
https://bidstats.uk/tenders/2023/W51/812974190
Thanks Lucretuis. I get that their tactic is to make this whole thing go on as long as possible, but at what point do they stop appealing all this and wasting money on lawyers. Are they really going to apply to appeal again? On what grounds given the overwhelming defeat? Surely they now realise that PCIP isn't going to roll over and agree to a low ball offer. The whole thing is becoming more insane by the week.
Interestingly Mr Silverleaf did pipe up to say that the case had been brought by Sycurio/Livingbridge after consulting an expert—and no prizes for guessing who!!!—and the 19th Earl of Devon, who is also a barrister and a partner in Michelmores. The 19th Earl of Devon is otherwise known as Charles Peregrine Courtenay.
So: clearly yesterday doesn’t lay to rest the long-standing claim from PCIP’s board that the case was unfounded and brought for ulterior motive. I am sure that Livingbridge/Sycurio will be breathing a sigh of relief that a member of its team has not yet jumped ship and provided a witness statement that might have given firm evidential footing to PCIP’s board’s claim.
The usually unctuous Michael Silverleaf KC, Sycurio’s brief, was out of sorts at High Court yesterday during the Form of Order hearing in the Sycurio v. PCIP case. Bereft of his junior and constantly pestered by post-it notes from Nick Viney, Sycurio’s CEO, who deigned to turn up to court to witness his firm receive another judicial kicking, Mr Silverleaf never hit his straps.
From the moment, quite early in the day, when he addressed the redoubtable Mrs Justice Bacon as “your Lordship” he was batting on an exceptionally sticky wicket.
Mrs Justice Bacon was visibly unimpressed as Mr Silverleaf and Richard Davis KC, PCIP’s brief, spent the morning bickering over how costs should be calculated for the provisional cost award. It was not an edifying watch. Both men gave the impression of ageing heavyweights. When a task of devilishly difficult mathematical complexity came up—diving 102 by six—neither man had his abacus with him so the calculation was beyond reach.
On the substance of the day, Mrs Justice Bacon refused Mr Silverleaf’s application for appeal, meaning that Sycurio has until 8th January 2024 to file leave to appeal directly with the Appeals Court, should it chose to do so. It would seem that Mrs Justice Bacon is able to read easily Mr Silverleaf’s tell: the strength of his arguments is inversely correlated to their complexity.
On the cost side, because of Michelmores, Sycurio’s lawyers, not doing their job properly and choosing as their key trial witness a non-expert expert, Mrs Penn, whose evidence on technical matters Mrs Justice Bacon rejected at trial, PCIP was awarded part of its costs on an indemnity basis (ie, the standard cost recovery uplifted by about 25%. This is a punishment for poor litigation conduct).
As I didn’t have my abacus with me either, I can’t entirely vouch for the accuracy of what follows. It would appear that PCIP will be entitled to an interim provisional cost award of around £1m, which will paid into an escrow account at their solicitors. This money will be released from escrow to PCIP on the earlier of the Appeals Court’s determination of any application by Sycurio to appeal, or 5th February 2024. Although it would appear that Sycurio will be able to make an application to the Appeals Court to “stay” the release from escrow if its application for leave to appeal has not been determined by 5th February 2024.
PCIP’s KC, Mr Davis, said in court that the whole infringement case was speculative, thin and opportunistic that had been brought for ulterior motives, about which he had hints. But (and obviously) Mr Davis did not have a witness statement from Sycurio/Livingbridge about what these motives might have been. As a result, Mrs Justice Bacon was quick to say that he didn’t need to go there.
What does that say? Update abou the UK court decision filed with the US courts given its close proximity?
18 Dec
Filling by Pci-pal
https://www.pacermonitor.com/case/41847299/Semafone_Limited
Great summary, as always. Hope the FT get ahold of this some day!
“We are responsible for running the vital national IT systems which support health and social care, and the collection, analysis, publication and dissemination of data generated by health and social care services to improve outcomes for patients”.(https://www.england.nhs.uk/about/what-we-do/)
Personally, I think it’s a tad problematic to sit as a deputy chair on such a body when one of your firm’s holdings, expert in data security, has just breached a confidentiality agreement by hearing details about a competitor’s technology, which were obtained by launching UK patent infringement proceedings, based on evidential thin air. But, evidently, it’s OK for NHS England.
And where’s Wotton?
One person who would be able to give a clear insight into Livingbridge’s culture is Ken Wotton. Mr Wotton is managing director, public equity, at Gresham House Asset Management, PCIP’s second largest shareholder with 9.2%, who, rightly, turned down Livingbridge’s hostile bid for PCIP. Mr Wotton knows Livingbridge exceedingly well. From January 2013 to May 2014, he was a partner in Livingbridge EP LLP, and from June 2014 to November 2018 he was a partner in Livingbridge VC LLP. The two designated members of Livingbridge VC LLP were/are Mr Kolade and Ms Egan. Don’t be too shy to give us your views on what has gone on here, Mr Wotton. Other PCIP shareholders would love to hear your unvarnished opinions. Do you not have an ethical duty to call out this type of behaviour. If not, why not?
Cover-up or clean-up?
The smell emanating from 100 Wood Street, Livingbridge’s London HQ, is not a very unpleasant one, and could grow worse as more details emerge. Mr Kolade needs to clean house--and quickly. A scapegoat won’t do.
Roll up, roll up: 10:30am tomorrow The Rolls Building, court 2
Livingbridge EP’s principal activity is to provide “investment management and advisory services” and is “the operator and manager of a range of private equity investment vehicles, structured as limited liability partnerships” (ie, Livingbridge’s funds). These include Livingbridge 7 Global LP, which is the ultimate owner of Sycurio.
The people with the real power in a LLP are the so-called “designated members” (ie, they are the head honchos). Livingbridge EP has two designated members: Wol Kolade and Sheenagh Egan. Mr Kolade is the managing partner and head at Livingbridge. He sits on the investment committee and chairs the supervisory board. “His role encompasses overall responsibility for the leadership and strategic development of Livingbridge, senior-level involvement in winning deals and active involvement in selective key investments”. (See https://www.livingbridge.com/people/wol-kolade).
Ms Egan sits on the management board which is responsible for the strategy of the firm and day-to-day management of the business (see https://www.livingbridge.com/people/sheenagh-egan) and also on the supervisory board. She is Livingbridge’s COO.
Livingbridge’s investment committee must also have approved the decision to have a tilt at PCIP, which at the highest bid price (90p), would have cost well in excess of £70m, once all the prospective bid’s costs were included.
As Mr Hollingsworth is still a partner in the LPP and a director of Yale Topco Ltd and Sycurio Ltd, it is difficult to avoid the conclusion that Mr Kolade and Ms Egan condone his actions.
Bear in mind the breach of confidentiality in April 2022 by a firm supposed to be experts in data security. There is no suggestion that Mr Kolade or Ms Egan sanctioned or approved of the breach of confidentiality. But they preside over a culture at Livingbridge under which this breach happened.
A month before the breach, Mr Kolade, a Tory party donor, was appointed as a Deputy Chair of NHS England. According to its website, one of NHS England’s responsibilities is: (see part 6)
5. Having had his bluff called by PCIP, Mr Hollingsworth and Sycurio/Livingbridge’s UK lawyers, Michelmores, faced a rather large problem. The case could not be brought to trial without expert written evidence. As Mrs Justice Bacon made clear in her judgment it was Michelmores’ responsibility “to ensure that the expert had the necessary expertise and is aware of the duties imposed on an expert witness”. Clearly Michelmores didn’t discharge its responsibilities properly in choosing Mrs Penn as Sycurio/Livingbridge’s expert. So: Michelmores either made a gross error of judgement, which just happened to enable Sycurio/ Livingbridge to bring it case to court; or it informed its client Sycurio/Livingbridge (ie, ultimately Mr Hollingsworth) that it had doubts about Mrs Penn’s suitability as an expert witness and was instructed to press on regardless. Either way it doesn’t reflect well on Sycurio/Livingbridge/Mr Hollingsworth: either they didn’t ask enough questions about Mrs Penn, or they rolled the dice, gambling on a pre-trial settlement or other solution (ie, takeover attempts 2-4 in March-May 2023), just before the trial. That is all-in!
6. Mr Hollingsworth managed to revive long-standing but suppressed resentment on the part of Eckoh Plc, the other big player in the PCI DSS space, over the patent infringement proceedings Sycurio had brought against it in 2013. (These were settled in 2015 by means of a confidential licensing agreement.) Since September 2021 Eckoh (and PCIP) have filed opposition to three of Sycurio’s European patents. The European Patent Office has already revoked one of Sycurio’s patents; its decision on two more is still to come.
Before going any farther, let’s take a step back lest Livingbridge is tempted to present all this as an aberrant freelance frolic on Mr Hollingsworth’s part. Mr Hollingsworth has clearly not acted on his own; Sycurio’s investment committee must have approved the initial investment in Sycurio in June 2021.
Mr Hollingswoth was made a partner of Livingbridge EP LLP only in April 2022, the month of the breach of the confidentiality agreement (most probably with Mr Hollingsworth present). (see part 5)
It would be highly invidious to list again all of Mr Hollingsworth’s (and Livingbridge’s) mistakes, misjudgements, and dubious actions, so let’s do it. (Of course, some of this is based on supposition):
1. He bought the wrong company at the wrong price and at the wrong time. For £110m, the toppy price Livingbridge paid for Sycurio at the top of the market in June 2021, Livingbridge could have offered 150p a share for PCIP, an offer that surely would have been accepted.
2. He miscalculated that patent infringement proceedings, brought in September 2021 to distract PCIP’s management, drain its cash resources and potentially gain access to PCIP’s technology secrets, would cause PCIP to roll over and accept a settlement by way of confidential licence agreement. This, Sycurio/Livingbridge could have spun as a victory.
3. When he realised that he had bought a duff company with a duff management team, he decided to switch to a back-up plan to buy PCIP, which would solve several rather large problems in one go: it would cover up the duff investment, it would bring on board a top-notch management team to run the enlarged group, it would eliminate a competitor, it would gain access to superior technology and it would mean the end of the patent case, an obvious bluff, based on evidential thin air.
4. In April 2022, once mediation had failed and an initial offer to buy PCIP had been rebuffed, Sycurio held its now infamous board meeting—attended by unnamed Livingbridge personnel (but most likely to have been Mr Hollingsworth and his Livingbridge sidekick, Curtis Kahn). During this meeting, confidential information about PCIP’s technology, details of which Sycurio had obtained thanks to the patent case, were discussed in front of certain people in breach of a confidentiality agreement. (It is worth remembering that the confidentiality breach was disclosed to PCIP only in May 2023 by Sycurio’s US lawyers, not by Sycurio/Livingbridge themselves. Assuming that Sycurio/Livingbridge’s US lawyers have high ethical standards, it must be assumed that the breach was disclosed as soon as the US lawyers became aware of it, and at the US lawyers’ insistence. That is a measure of how serious it was. Not to have done so could have caused considerable reputational damage to the US lawyers. The question about how the US lawyers became aware of the egregious breach of the confidentiality agreement remains an open one.) (see part 4)
Perhaps most anxious of all and almost certainly absent from the court, as he was during the trial, will be Simon Hollingsworth, a 40-yr old Livingbridge executive (see https://www.livingbridge.com/people/simon-hollingsworth). Mr Hollingsworth sits as a non-executive director on the board of Yale Topco Ltd, a Jersey company at the top of the chain through which Livingbridge 7 Global LP, one of Livingbridge’s funds, controls its investment in Sycurio Ltd, of which Mr Hollingsworth is also a non-executive director.
Mr Hollingsworth is the person at Livingbridge with responsibility for the investment in Sycurio. He was one of the people behind the takeover attempts of PCIP. For instance, on 17th April 2023, a month or so after Sycurio had made its third attempt to buy PCIP, Mr Hollingsworth (and Sycurio’s CEO) met with PCIP’s CEO and soon afterwards repeated Sycurio’s bagatelle offer of 90p per share. After that Sycurio, through unnamed M&A advisors, most probably at Mr Hollingsworth’s instigation, went hostile by directly contacting PCIP’s two largest shareholders, Canaccord and Gresham House, who between them then held 27.4% of PCIP.
It's my hunch that, as this story unfolds, Mr Hollingsworth might be getting a call or two from journalists on national newspapers. If so, it might well be far beyond the capabilities of even London’s finest PR lickspittles to put any positive spin on his role or, for that matter, Livingbridge’s.
Before examining the “highlights” of Mr Hollingsdworth’s involvement, let’s take a step back and look very briefly at some of the guff that Livingbridge trumpets about itself:
“Livingbridge is a collection of driven people from incredibly diverse operational, financial and entrepreneurial backgrounds. Each going all-in, from day-one. It’s the only way we know.”
At least Mr Hollingsworth lives up to his firm’s billing: as we will see, nobody could accuse him of “not going all-in, from day-one”. What he, high on hubris, no doubt imagined would be a career-enhancing move—Livingbridge’s acquisition of Sycurio--looks to have turned into a career-limiting move and, hopefully, will end as a career-finishing move when Livingbridge’s behaviour becomes more widely known and its reputation tarnished. (see part 3)
PCIP shareholders, of whom I am one, will have been having a relaxing weekend, as will have PCIP’s management team. Tomorrow is, in effect, their/our big day in court: Mrs Justice Bacon will decide whether to grant Sycurio/Livingbridge leave to appeal her crushing judgment, and the amount and timing of the provisional cost award in PCIP’s favour.
Discussed in open court will be PCIP’s senior lawyer’s witness statement revealed on this blog last weekend, the main headline of which was that Livingbridge made four attempts, one hostile, in the period March 2022 to May 2023 to buy PCIP on the cheap after having battered its share price through launching patent infringement cases in both the US and UK in September 2021 that rest on nothing more than evidential thin air.
PCIP has also filed other, but confidential, witness statements with the court. What on earth do these statements say?
The briefs representing PCIP will be Richard Davis KC and his junior, Ed ‘two brains’ Cronan, a rising star IP legal circles, who was PCIP’s junior counsel during the trial. Mr Davis was brought in by PCIP after the trial to replace Guy Tritton, whose cross-examination skills are renowned but no longer needed as the case moves to a different stage. Mr Tritton’s relentless and (rightly) merciless cross-examination of Sycurio’s non-expert expert on technical matters, Mrs Penn, a 70-yr old dyslexic widow in ill health, on her written evidence was the piece de resistance of the trial, and will continue to give Mrs Penn nightmares for a very long time to come.
Mr Davis spearheaded PCIP’s reply to Sycurio/Livingbridge’s preposterous (and ultimately fruitless) attempt to amend the wording of the patent almost as soon as the trial had finished.
On the Sycurio/Livingbridge side, the weekend will have been less relaxed. The trial was not one of the finer moments in a distinguished career for Michael Silverleaf KC, Sycurio/Livingbridge’s brief, whose grandiloquence is inversely proportionate to his height.
In her judgment, with rather acid understatement, Mrs Justice Bacon, who gave no weight to Mrs Penn’s expert evidence on technical matters, wrote: “That is no doubt why, in his closing submission, Mr Silverleaf placed almost no reliance on Mrs Penn’s evidence. He contended that he did not need to do so, because he could make his submissions on the basis of the undisputed materials and PCI-Pal’s own evidence. That was an unfortunate position to end up in, given the scope of Mrs Penn’s written evidence. For the reasons set out below I consider that Mr Silverleaf’s submissions on technical points could not be maintained without evidential support, which ultimately he did not have”. (see part 2)
Https://www.ipo.gov.uk/p-ipsum/Document/ApplicationNumber/GB1421597.4/754fee9c-d779-4d43-82e5-8e90c9fb1b4b/GB2526389-20190710-Opinion%20request%20attachment.pdf
GB2526389 - System and method for secure transmission of data signals
Documents
16 July 2019 Letter - Litigation section
16 July 2019 Letter - Litigation section
12 August 2019 Opinion observations
15 August 2019 Letter - Litigation section
15 August 2019 Letter - Litigation section
28 August 2019 Opinion observations in reply
28 August 2019 Letter - Litigation section
07 October 2019 Opinion
07 October 2019 Letter - Litigation section
07 October 2019 Letter - Litigation section
30 April 2020 Letter - Litigation section
01 June 2020 Amendments
01 June 2020 Letter - Agent/applicant
01 June 2020 Amendments
01 June 2020 Description
22 July 2020 Claims
22 October 2020 Decision - Litigation
22 October 2020 Letter - Litigation section
04 November 2020 Publication document
https://www.ipo.gov.uk/p-ipsum/Case/PublicationNumber/GB2526389
Re-reading Mrs Bacon's Judgement lead me to looking for anything other than the Press Release with the words “Secure Exchange” and Liveops in it.
Came up with this.
SecureExchangeScoping and Basic SolutionCustomer has requested to use the LiveOps Secure Exchange service to capture credit card numbers during voice/phone conversations. Secure Exchange is only supported for the voice channel. Secure Exchange requires the use of the LiveOps scripting system as well as LiveOps IVRs.Secure Exchange is designed to capture only one credit card number per call.LiveOps will assign one Technical Service consultant to lead the Secure Exchange implementation. LiveOps will provide a script to drive the interaction with the LiveOps Secure Exchange IVR. This script will be configured on the Customer’s campaigns/call flows and will require the use of the LiveOps screen pop feature.High level description of Secure Exchange flow:a)Call arrives at agent desktop who is using the standard LiveOpsagent desktop.b)LiveOps script (developed under this SOW by LiveOps based on Customer’s participation) is popped on call arrival. This script includes a button for the agent to initiate credit card capture when ready.c)Customer’s agent selects the button to initiate the LiveOps standard Secure Exchange module to capture the credit card. It is assumed the standard LiveOps Secure Exchange module with built-in voice prompt confirmations, error handlers, credit card number format validation, and expiration datevalidation will be used with no customization.
12d)The credit card information is stored in encrypted form in the LiveOps highly secure, limited access PCI compliant“red zone” infrastructure for 90 days and is then deletedLiveOps updates PCI ROC annuallyand will provide an updated report upon customer’s request.e)During the time when the end customer is engaged with the LiveOps Secure Exchange module, there will be no audio recording until the end customer is returned back to the agent.f)The call returns to the Customer agent with the results of the credit card capture displayed (success or fail). A Reference ID is also returned that is used to refer to the credit card information in the LiveOps secure “red zone” infrastructure.The following services are included in the scope of Secure Exchange:LiveOps will provide a master IVR (where the customer enters their credit card number) and a slave IVR (where the agent is placed on hold and status updates are whispered to the agent).LiveOps will manage both the script and the IVRs. Customer will be able to self-configure the script for new campaigns. After call completion, the credit card information is stored in the LiveOps PCI compliant repository.
More here
https://docplayer.net/6253851-Appendix-e-to-dir-contract-no-dir-tso-2986.html
Friday, December 15, 2023
93 2 pgs notice Notice (Other) Fri 12/15 12:59 PM
NOTICE of RESPONSE TO NOTICE OF SUPPLEMENTAL AUTHORITY by Sycurio Limited, Sycurio, Inc. re90 Notice (Other) (Werber, Matthew)
https://www.pacermonitor.com/public/case/41847299/Semafone_Limited
Mrs Justice Bacon 10:30am The Rolls Building, court 2
Consequentials/Further Arguments HP-2021-000030
Sycurio Limited v PCI-PAL Plc and others
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/business-and-property-courts-rolls-building-cause-list/business-and-property-courts-of-england-and-wales-cause-list#chancery-appeals-chancery-division
Lucretuis
Not Justin John Hill, this time
Response was from James Prankerd Smith. Only been at Dentons for three months, so 29 pages is not a bad effort.
Experience
Dentons Graphic
Associate
Dentons
Oct 2023 - Present 3 months
Education
University of Cambridge Graphic
University of Cambridge
MSci Physics
2010 - 2014
==========================================
Guy Tritton
IP/IT/Media Barrister & Acting General Counsel for Origina
5mo Edited
Huge achievement for Edward Cronan of Hogarth. I have in fact been leading Ed for the last two weeks in a telecoms patent trial ...(or was he leading me, I forget 🤔?) and I can say truly that he was outstanding. But on the crunch question, yes, I am taller than him by half an inch
https://www.linkedin.com/posts/guytritton_huge-achievement-for-edward-cronan-of-hogarth-activity-7078347098672230400-4hvv
=================================
List of "And I Would Have Gotten Away With It Too, If It Weren't For ...
The line was tinkered with in The New Scooby-Doo Movies, but it wasn't until the fourth episode of The Scooby-Doo/Dynomutt Hour, Watt a Shocking Ghost, when Mayor Dudley put it all together and declared "We would have gotten away with it, if it hadn't been for you meddling kids!"
https://scoobydoo.fandom.com/wiki/List_of_%22And_I_Would_Have_Gotten_Away_With_It_Too,_If_It_Weren%27t_For_You_Meddling_Kids%22_Quotes
Victor,
Remarkable self-restraint from Dentons: a mere 29-pages!! There must be a few good Xmas parties to go to. Let’s see what the EPO says in due course. I know where my money is. The score should be 3-0.
I think maybe Mr Viney finds the truth a difficult concept.
13.12.2023 (Electronic) Receipt
13.12.2023 Citation in opposition procedure
13.12.2023 Citation in opposition procedure
13.12.2023 Citation in opposition procedure
13.12.2023 Consolidated list of cited opposition documents
13.12.2023 Letter accompanying subsequently filed items
13.12.2023 Letter regarding the opposition procedure (no time limit)
https://register.epo.org/application?number=EP09742359&lng=en&tab=doclist
--------------------------------------------------
***Is this true?
Ver el perfil de Nick Viney
Nick Viney
CEO & Board member of Sycurio. Adviser| Mentor| Investor. Former CEO of CYBER1. Ex-Avast, McAfee, Google, Microsoft and Andersen.
1 mes
Fantastic news ! Another big partner collaboration goes live.
*** No other PCI and Payments CX provider can offer such a range of integrations in the enterprise space***
BIG NEWS 📣
We are excited to announce our partnership with Five9! This powerful integration will enable Five9 customers to provide secure and trusted #paymentexperiences as an embedded part of their solution portfolio while enhancing #CX. Read more about how you can seamlessly integrate Sycurio.Voice with your Five9 Intelligent Cloud contact Center: https://bit.ly/3MC7RlE
https://www.linkedin.com/posts/nickviney_sycurio-announces-partnership-with-five9-activity-7128140150286532609-nHku
-------------------------------
leycrjb, nothing new to report.