London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
https://twitter.com/search?q=%23NCYT&src=recent_search_click&f=live
Better linkhttps://twitter.com/StickyStock81/status/1407762747983646721
A couple months later I'll be regretting not throwing the kitchen sink in at these prices...
So the company is actually responding to shareholders emails now? Must be bonus time ;-)
Only for shorters, not LTHs...we are well and truly getting a doing over. Makes no sense, one of the more successful companies over the last year and here we are minus £9 give or take from our peak, when so much good was & still is on for us, if not more than? We are well and truly being played, and the circle needs breaking asap.
It’s just after breaky time for those who watch screens all day and dip in at 320 only to sell after a good lunch with a couple of fine wines around 320 o clock, thanks for the 10% folks!
Same again tomorrow I expect
This is why we need to move onto the Nasdaq for a greater investor reach.
With very low volume as current, its easier to place a few shorts to control the price or indeed attract a few trading ars@holes like the post earlier trying to catch a few percentage points. We need to rid these stock of these vultures. Of course there are more viable targets out there now. A number were closing out today, retail sales are fairly exhausted. The Long term holders holding stock now after all events are almost die hard frankly!!! they are not selling, well not at fire sale prices anyhow.
If you create news that will encourage sustained buying or are listed on a market with greater reach, these issues are far less of a problem. It will happen imo, tide starting to turn imo.
Onwards and upwards
I've got to say, this must be the longest get-rich-very-quick scheme that I've been in.
Read this, dots will line up soon!!
https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/private-coronavirus-covid-19-testing-validation/private-covid-19-testing-validation
Look forward to the revenue in H2. Had a look through the validation link and quite severe penalties for failure to meet compliance requirements. Hope they pursue Innova - not likely
****************************
Cut and paste!
Civil and criminal liabilities
To ensure compliance with the proposed validation requirements we propose that breaching a requirement should amount to a criminal offence and that the enforcement authority should be able to apply a range of different sanctions so that, where enforcement action is necessary, it is proportionate to the offence in question. Therefore, we suggest that the enforcement authority should be able to use following range of sanctions:
forfeiture of goods – allowing the seizure of unvalidated tests
monetary penalties – these are civil sanctions which would be classed as debt to the Secretary of State
fines – fines levied on individuals or companies following prosecution
custodial sentences – for individuals or corporate officers on summary conviction in England and Wales, to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 51 weeks (this is limited to 6 months until section 281 of the Criminal Justice Act 2003 is in force), in Scotland or Northern Ireland, to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 6 months
@locked and loaded .
I found that a very interesting read about testing standards and regulations , I suggest all holders read it .
This paragraph is extremely interesting to me .
“The gold standard set by the UK government-run validation process will potentially provide recognition in export markets providing such tests with a competitive advantage against unvalidated tests. This should increase the value of tests and make the UK a key market due to the high regulatory quality, in the same way the UK’s high and effective regulation of pharmaceuticals has led to it being a global centre for drugs research and manufacture. In the US Federal Drug Administration test approval process is around £200,000 to £300,000. The UK route is likely to cost less and therefore a UK independently approved test will be appealing to global companies. We believe this should marginally increase the likelihood of the UK being seen as a favourable place to carry out research and production of COVID-19 tests.”
We have been posting regular reports on the S&S accuracy of our tests for some time now and are due antigen and antibody LFT out soon.
Saintsmith... Hummmm, yes a good read...sure, though not a great start given the Innova fiasco. How will HM Gov't patch that one up?
https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/private-coronavirus-covid-19-testing-validation/private-covid-19-testing-validation
Mandatory validation process - who will set the standards ?
Needs to be speeded up and should have been a requirement all along IMO.
Last paragraph " IF " mandatory validation requirement was to be introduced, the UK Govt would " move quicklly " to make regulations under the Medicines and Medical Devices Act 2021 before the end of the year '.
The Govts preference regards mandatory validation appears to be a central approach through the DHSC and interestingly a
" Supporting " Lab.