We would love to hear your thoughts about our site and services, please take our survey here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
As are your libelous comments, reported as such hope it invokes a ban for all our sakes...
I only can see what the rest of you can see. I am not sat in an office, I’m sat in my garden in the sunshine.
Difference between me and Freddie is that I can understand what’s put in front of me.
For everybody’s state of mind use the filter .
He’s not worth discussing.
Hi Redirons
It must have been Newcrest that ordered the liners. On a timeline on the satellites you can see the pile growing, that was September last year.
Lol I wrote sat nav, I meant sat imagery Freddie!
Liam is recording his interview today, Proactive perhaps were meant to release today after recording yesterday, I don't know as they reposted yesterday's again on YouTube, so that was odd or they just released again due to an RNS.
Still, this isn't highly confidential news in the RNS, in fact we get these interim quarterly updates via RNS because Newcrest only agreed to do them up to a certain point and then stopped releasing updates a while back about Hav akin to most majors lesser reporting on exploration and development where they share less info. Shaun said GGP would continue interim reports individually via RNS at the time.
Can't speak for Bamps, perhaps info. came from Stu on twitter who speaks to loads of crew members via social media or his own connections told him pumps were still running or someone else.
Others also manage to get info. lime that chap on the forum who seems to know loads about Telfer, way of the world, where you have folk working on these sites, always some info. to be gathered.
Don't know how you work that out Fred but whatever floats your boat. best think of some more conspiracies to worry about.
What is Accretive?
In both finance and in general lexicon, the term "accretive" is the adjective form of the word "accretion", which refers to gradual or incremental growth. For example, an acquisition deal may be deemed accretive for the absorbing company, if that deal contributes to an increase in earnings per share.
By definition, in corporate finance, accretive acquisitions of assets or businesses must ultimately add more value to a company, than the expenditures associated with the acquisition. This can be due to the fact that the newly-acquired assets in question are purchased at a discount to their perceived current market value, or if the assets are expected to grow, as a direct result of the transaction.
We are worth the most only to 'us' I would suggest.
I don't think, sitting at 6 p and under, that anything 'eyewatering' would be offered at all, at this stage in our development.
It would be nice to think differently but we are where we are and who we are at present.
Shaun needs to work his magic and grow the company. Then in the future, 'anything' is possible.
I am here for that, as otherwise it is what it is. A small junior explorer with big plans. I am not belittling where we are in the slightest and am hugely excited for our possibilities...but we yet have a way to go.
DO I think we will get there? Yes. Just not yet!
Just don’t see it happening. Shaun hasn’t put together this team only to sell just before production.
You have to think if we sell Hav #ggp needs to have something else . An eye watering amount as Sean said would activate this and the amount of cash in Majors it ould happen .
I don't think that this is a binary play - clearly SD and the BoD believes that the company has the capacity and capability to do both at the same time. That being the case and given we are an exploration company as well as developer / hopefully soon to be miner, it makes absolute sense to continue to try and add to your portfolio of assets. Mining is a long long term game and an additional commercial find would give the company an added tail wind. As you say discovery to mining is a long process and just getting the discovery is a long process - best time to start is right now if it is manageable and clearly SD thinks it is.
Ok dip , but bamps said he was told the pumps were still running , that was before pro active interview and the rns . , how did he know this that was my point
Topslicer, I’m pretty confident that 99.9% of shareholders would prefer to get Havieron up & running, bringing profits into the coffers, rather than go exploring around Ernest Giles, just in the hope we find something worth persuing, that would take us another 10-20 yrs to get us to the stage we are already at with Havieron.
For me, Havieron should be our number one focus, anything else can wait.
Freddie, Liam has had regularly quarterly reviews arranged with Shaun for ages now, the clue is in the title.
As for top secret info. being shared it is more folk making assumptions from sat nav and also following on social.media or building relationships with workers in the teams working on the sites - something anyone can do for themselves like most of the research shared.
Frigger it was a fantastic rns and great news but it should come before any interviews or leaks to mates . Sd should know this
I agree Ginger tom - and as much as I would love us to own 100% of Hav, if EG is as good as we think it is, I wouldn't be disappointed to run with the current Hav JV. Although we have Quality not quantity at the top we could be in the ridiculous position of biting off more than we can chew. Im sure the BOD would over come the problem but the time frame for further exploration would be greatly extended in my view. What a lovely problem to have.
GLA
Not as long a road as it was and SD has found a short cut now as well.
Still over 30% down ytd...just saying long road it seems
The lower aquifer has been a niggling worry, SD seems confident it can be managed. Nothing holding us back now.
Hi Bamps - your post at 9.10 am - “will they start the Decline or wait till the sale process is complete” - is there any element that the JV confers a right of “BAU” until any partner exits the JV? In that case and what Shaun said yesterday about Newmont providing pond fillers (I think that’s what he said) in advance of them being needed, seems to suggest that all systems are go with no impediment due to the sales process - what do you think??
Hi Timber,
could you please copy-paste here this article as it's got a pay-wall? Not all of us have bought into GGP at your 1p average to afford it
Whilst I agree that we are all anxious to get Havieron sorted - one way or another - lets not forget that we have some of the most exciting ground to explore in the world , all sorted and ready to drill.
If there is a better portfolio of exploration prospects in Australia I have yet to see it. I am sure Bamps and the A team could list a dozen prospects that many junior/mid cap miners and explorers would love to have access to.
I would be amazed if we are not continuing to drill,Scope,Scan, Fly over - or whatever else is done to find the next potential mine.
So whilst Hav is the Golden Goose there are a lot of smaller eggs to hatch before we count our chickens.
What a fowl analogy - sorry.
Stay upbeat guys its only just entered round three of a 15 round championship bout.
GLA GT1
Some Oz coverage...
https://www.businessnews.com.au/article/Greatland-open-to-Havieron-outcomes
So later today there will be a new aim on air interview , hmm when was that first arranged i wonder . There always seems to be info leaked a day or to before , funny that
Just careful language by Shaun in not intimating that a deal to purchase both assets is outright guaranteed to the market is all it is, he has taken this slant since the Newmont bid for Newcrest surfaced in mostly being very careful and reserved in his statements in regards to GGP strategy and potential outcomes on divestment by Newmont.
Agree about the strange language, particularly the phrase "significant option value." Is it possible to sell on a ROLR to a third party, maybe as part of a JV?