Scancell founder says the company is ready to commercialise novel medicines to counteract cancer. Watch the video here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
Which troll posted to Bamps 08/01/2020 - ' Where are Predator going to fund US$4.2m?'
At current exchange rates £3.56m is equivalent to over US$4.6m !
PRD state in their Placing rns that it was over subscribed which suggests that more could have been raised and possibly might be in the future if this dynamic company with substantial director shareholdings continues to meet objectives!
Whether PRD exercise the option to buy TI is clearly not known at this time although they talk a lot about CO2 EOR in the Placing rns but I think it's pretty clear they didn't bother approaching our well known troll for funding advice ROFLMAO!
Here is a clue - it wasn't fishsheds ( has he been banned or just done the decent thing at last !)
It wasn't rossannan ( ditto!)
It wasn't krapper - she wouldn't have a clue !
I highly recommend reading the PRD Admission notice. What’s the point of having a SPA anyway?
Keen as Mustard! :D
What’s the score with Massy and their field?
Massy is who has the JV to supply the CO2 for TI.
Lex - I've seen plenty of Placings where the claim of over subscription has not been made - just stating info from the rns, approved by NOMAD. PRD are a loss maker so people are showing support for management and the way they have conducted themselves to date as well as their stated objectives - they do seem keen to blow the trumpet on CO2 - no guarantees it will lead to buyout but the flame is still burning on that score - I wouldn't want to be the one to rule it out Lex , or, for that matter, be like the troll who questioned the likelihood PRD would be able to raise serious finance, as has just occurred!
Thanks for keeping in touch - you are one of the cuddlier trolls !
What a joke this BB has become. Now the LTHs are attacking each other! V-max(“there is no whiskey in the jar left”), get a grip! For once we have a great poster like Bamps (though he does remind me of the Onceatrader, who I liked a lot).
Oh, well maybe a sign this company is going nowhere and now we are turning on each other. Keep the focus: attach ****heads et all. You will be hard pushed to find nastier one-cell-organisms!
Hi LGO
I can assure you I am not onceatrader , I don't trade (short) and I always try to help people.
Being attacked with a keyboard is not pleasant but I don't really give a damn.
I like this Board but it's time to call it a day
Don't call it a day Bamps, you're very well respected and most sensible posters have zero time for the Mother Superior types who scathingly post they've been there, done that and you can't tell me anything. Your advice, in the sociable manner delivered, is extremely welcomed by all wishing to broaden their knowledge of not only the potential fortunes of Columbus, but of the oil industry as a whole. Stick with us LTHs., we're nearly there at a breakthrough imo.
Bamps - I'd just like to echo, I enjoyed reading your posts and I find them insightful.
Bamps- the post today at 17:27 has got 8 recommends already so that tells you all you need to know about how much support you have on this board and the Trolls have none. You have helped many people by sharing your experience and giving generously of your time and effort in providing simple explanations to complex statements. I and others have probably not expressed our gratitude before and have taken your generosity for granted and for that I apologise. I‘d like to think you have steered us through the tough times so it would be great if you were still around share in the good times which may come very soon - fingers crossed! I hope you decide to continue posting and you can ignore the trolls. Thanks for all your contributions to date. ??
Interestingly the troll who was the subject of this thread was originally arguing with, who else but - Bamps! Bamps does talk a lot of sense hence the desire to discredit him.
I know that many of our trolls will be pleased to be put out of their agony by me naming the troll responsible - it was, of course, LayLadyLay !
You'd think after the sad news this weekend of the impact of online abuse / harassment, that this would stop on all social platforms.
And considering people have invested money into this, and many other shares, and some, have invested well beyond their means and hidden so from their families.
If you're not invested and don't have anything decent to say about the share, don't speak.
Grow up, Irene.
Krapp, what GRQ is trying to say in a polite way is, go away. You are posting lies and untruths, Big MJ for example, had to post the other day confirming that he had not sold any of his holding, contradicting a previous troll comment that he had. You in particular seem enjoy taking snippets of other posters quotes, attempting to ridicule and humiliate the poster by stating they have no or limited knowledge about a subject. I do not believe you have any shares in this company and that yours posts are designed to create nothing more than a negative affect, so with that in mind, I suggest you find something else to fill your time.
Think you forgot the "If you're not invested " part, in your reply there Fishcakes........ :()
not surprised though.........!
All the best (good holiday.......... ?)
lol........!
Not a good trip then eh.........! against the tide was it....?
All the best (Knew not New, and sad not said..... :()
I stand accused by in4cedros of not believing that PRD will ever take up the option to purchase the Innis -Trinity field from CERP for a minimum consideration of US$4.2m. This carrot has been waved around at CERP investors for as long as I can remember and the expiry of the option has been extended time and time again. My view is that it will never happen but no doubt the option will remain and be extended yet again as it sounds plausible if somewhat unlikely in my opinion. Sadly, some rampers quote this sum as if it is inevitable, no doubt in order to tempt new investors into believing that the company will suddenly become cash rich and able to fund it's operations without regularly having to raise new funds.
I remember when CERP was LGO and in4cedros went to extreme lengths to promote the BNP oil swap deal negotiated by Neil Ritson. I couldn't see how this was affordable and history proved me right. We now have another point of disagreement and it's nothing to do with discrediting Bamps or any other poster. It's about having a different perspective on the likelihood of something positive occurring, or not. Unfortunately it seems that in4cedros doesn't like contrary views to his own. He clearly can't get no satisfaction:
"But, he can't be a man 'cause he doesn't smoke
The same cigarettes as me "
in4cedros can't get no satisfaction
It seems that in4cedros confuses disagreeing
Really Fishfingers.............?
I'm sure them two would jump at the chance of coming back here, now that Leo and his team have turned this co. around, and we're on brink of transformation news/times....... :)
All the best (but it ain't gonna happen, them two coming back that is.......... :()
It seems that in4cedros confuses disagreeing on points raised by other posters as being attacks on the poster when it's nothing more than an alternative viewpoint. This board serves no useful purpose if debate is only focused on ramping the sp mindlessly although I can see why some attempt to do just that.
True that LLL, the CO2 is only worth the success of what oil it can push out, minus contractual obligations.
A bonus for CERP though if they don’t opt to purchase.
Irene..........!
I'm no accountant, but if you were to click on the "Fundamentals" button above, you'll see an increase in revenue (nearly double), a decrease in profits (give you that one), and all while sorting out legacy issues...........!
A sound base, and transformational future lies ahead...........!
All the best (IMO :)
I forgot to add Irene..............!
your pet Fishpie wants Ritson (retired) and Lenigas (lol) back at the helm...........!
All the best (he certainly does have a short memory doesn't he :()
LayLadyLay - CALM DOOOOOOOOOOWN - I never accused you of that - just read the quote - you suggested PRD may not be able to capital raise the amount required- which they’ve just done - seems like folks are keen to support that business- CO2 EOR results will clearly be influential on future decision making!
"Have you all given up now? Have you all admitted defeat?"
no, to your first question Fishsteaks...........!
no, to your second question Fishshapes.....! (smart price, Asdas :)
Do you really want Neil and Dave back............?
All the best (Might help a spread bet that you may or may not have on the negative, but really ?)