Adrian Hargrave, CEO of SEEEN, explains how the Company is now funded through to profitability. Watch the video here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
Https://www.ft.com/content/88c8b435-7bed-4b75-ae0e-0d2673e08305
Please use the sharing tools found via the share button at the top or side of articles. Copying articles to share with others is a breach of FT.com T&Cs and Copyright Policy. Email licensing@ft.com to buy additional rights. Subscribers may share up to 10 or 20 articles per month using the gift article service. More information can be found at https://www.ft.com/tour.
https://www.ft.com/content/88c8b435-7bed-4b75-ae0e-0d2673e08305
Shareholders in BP are preparing for the company to scale back its climate targets further after a shift in tone from the oil major’s new chief executive.
BP is alone among its peers in committing to cut oil and gas production, setting a target in 2023 of producing 2mn barrels of oil equivalent by the end of the decade, a 25 per cent reduction from 2019 levels.
The target has already been pared back once, from a 40 per cent cut announced in 2020, but shareholders believe that Murray Auchincloss, who took over from Bernard Looney as chief executive in January, is prepared to be more flexible as demand for oil and gas continues to grow.
“Do we think BP is going to change their guidance on oil production? Yes, we do,” said one top-10 shareholder. But, they added, “we’re not sure this is the right thing to focus attention on . . . precisely how many barrels of oil BP is going to produce”.
The shareholder said the shift was “partly a response to market pricing” — the war in Ukraine inflated oil prices, while a higher interest rate environment has hurt the profitability of renewables projects.
“Murray is saying outwardly that there’s no change but behind the scenes he’s being a lot more pragmatic, returns-focused and hard-nosed about it,” another investor said. “We’d all love them to build more in renewables but from a shareholder point of view, returns are not there.”
Another investor said they would “not be surprised if they decided they had been too ambitious and moved more in line with their peers and not cut oil and gas production as much as they initially said they would.”
This investor added: “Since Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, [oil companies] are seen as providing countries with energy security rather than being terrible companies polluting the world — and they have used that to their advantage.”
Any decision by Auchincloss to weaken BP’s climate pledges would mark a significant pivot away from the green strategy of Looney, who quit the FTSE 100 group in September after failing to disclose past relationships with company colleagues.
Auchincloss, who served as Looney’s chief financial officer, has previously said that BP will “pragmatically adapt” to future changes in energy demand.
Analysts also pointed to comments he made in February that while BP has a 2mn barrel per day target, decisions about which projects to proceed with over the next two years “will really determine that.”
Y
Please use the sharing tools found via the share button at the top or side of articles. Copying articles to share with others is a breach of FT.com T&Cs and Copyright Policy. Email licensing@ft.com to buy additional rights. Subscribers may share up to 10 or 20 articles per month using the gift article service. More information can be found at https://www.ft.com/tour.
https://www.ft.com/content/88c8b435-7bed-4b75-ae0e-0d2673e08305
Auchincloss, who served as Looney’s chief financial officer, has previously said that BP will “pragmatically adapt” to future changes in energy demand.
Analysts also pointed to comments he made in February that while BP has a 2mn barrel per day target, decisions about which projects to proceed with over the next two years “will really determine that.”
Auchincloss had added: “So as we get through 2024 and 2025 and decide those, then we’ll update you in due course about what 2030 really looks like.”
BP declined to comment on whether it would continue to scale back its production target.
One analyst who covers BP said there had been a very different tone from the company during a capital markets day last October, when the oil group took investors on a field trip to the Permian basin in Texas. “It was very old school,” they noted.
Meanwhile an activist investor, Bluebell Capital Partners, wrote to BP’s board in March, alleging that its management had suggested to “multiple shareholders” that it might pump more oil and gas than planned.
“If, as we understand correctly from our conversations with fellow shareholders, BP’s management is hinting to shareholders during meetings that they might increase their oil and gas production above the 2mn barrels of oil equivalent a day targeted by 2030, then this should be reflected in BP’s official communication and targets,” Bluebell wrote in a letter, seen by the Financial Times.
The letter did not identify which shareholders BP had allegedly briefed.
BP disputed Bluebell’s account, saying it had “engaged extensively” with its shareholders and received “clear and widespread support” for its strategy. “Based on these engagements, we neither recognise Bluebell’s assertions nor have we heard support for their proposals,” it said.
Please use the sharing tools found via the share button at the top or side of articles. Copying articles to share with others is a breach of FT.com T&Cs and Copyright Policy. Email licensing@ft.com to buy additional rights. Subscribers may share up to 10 or 20 articles per month using the gift article service. More information can be found at https://www.ft.com/tour.
https://www.ft.com/content/88c8b435-7bed-4b75-ae0e-0d2673e08305
Last year, Bluebell called on BP to increase its production target to 2.5mn b/d of oil equivalent by 2030, arguing that it was destroying shareholder value by moving away from hydrocarbons faster than society.
The top-10 investor said that while so far the market had not rewarded BP for its energy transition strategy, ultimately the oil group’s approach would lead to better financial results and be reflected in its share price.
Spights Thanks for sharing
Think more than anything from the results tomorrow it will be the message accompanying them regarding future production,and where investment is targeted,that moves the sp ( or not).
Think there is a lot of potential to talk up sp,if they can just get the message right.
i think most of us said ages ago, the renewables rubbish wouldn't make any significant money. looney thought he could pay £1bn for a crown wind licence alone and still make money. well, orsted's well documented troubles have proved that to be grossly wishful thinking. archea energy and traveller's were also dumb purchases by looney. only oil and gas can make serious money for bp. the rest is capital being ****ed away to appease the green religion.
at this point, what credibility will murray have after a reversal of a strategy of which looney and he were chief architects against good advice and obvious logic?
the whole board should resign en masse including murray and invite offers from larger peers. i will take 650 equivalent in shares in a chevron, exxon orshell that isn't embarrassed by what it does. or 700 cash.
all imho dyor
happy
Happy,
Largely agree with what you said but the TA acquisition was a very good purchase - unlocks many sources of value for bp in the worlds largest market.
Archea I’m less convinced at considering bp paid $4bn+ , the boed it will produce is miniscule and it will take capital away from o&g to produce it.
I agree, a major shift in strategy means the entire board should resign. They’ve shown their incompetence in signing off the original strategy and now they want to keep their cushty six figure roles when a major pivot is required? Not for me.
WP
From Archea own site
“ Our goal is for Archaea to be a stable, predictable, profitable business, and we seek to remove variability from our financial returns where possible,” said Light. “Our differentiated commercial strategy is focused on selling a targeted 70% of our expected RNG production volumes under long-term, fixed-price contracts with creditworthy counterparties. This enables us to lock in expected double-digit returns in a downside case, looking only at contracted volumes. We take a ‘highest and best use’ approach to remaining production volumes, which today are sold into the transportation market where they can generate renewable identification number [RIN] and/or low-carbon fuel standard [LCFS] credits. We prefer to reduce our exposure to these markets, which can be volatile and have regulatory risk, through our long-term contracting strategy. Additionally, we focus on landfill gas, which is a low-cost, stable, predictable, long-term feedstock, with landfill gas production expected for more than 20 to 30 years or longer on average at our project sites. Further, we are implementing the Archaea V1 plant design this year, which is a standardized, modularized design that is expected to significantly reduce capital costs and build timelines compared to industry averages.”
So double returns for 70% of their production and aiming for higher it the other 30% ,I’m interested to see where this goes.
Costs are very predictable.
Price paid might be a concern, but I think it may prove ok