Ryan Mee, CEO of Fulcrum Metals, reviews FY23 and progress on the Gold Tailings Hub in Canada. Watch the video here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
“Here’s to the crazy ones, the misfits, the rebels, the troublemakers, the round pegs in the square holes… the ones who see things differently — they’re not fond of rules… You can quote them, disagree with them, glorify or vilify them, but the only thing you can’t do is ignore them because they change things… they push the human race forward, and while some may see them as the crazy ones, we see genius, because the ones who are crazy enough to think that they can change the world, are the ones who do.” Steve Jobs
Agreed! I should of posted this a month ago - not that anyone would listen :)
Jonno41.
I understand where you’re coming from and totally agree with you but I think it is a bit late to try and keep the powder dry.GLA LTHs
Mark - agreed - but that’s also not really relevant to the SOA being passed - the point I am making is it’s the shareholders making money from the SOA by buying in when it was announced - I appreciate I am isolating a group of shareholders but reading this board over the last few months you do see a lot of posters who have bought in around the 10p - this is the FCA they’ll be bullied by MP’s and the likes of shareholders and the LTIP’s benefiting hugely from the SOA being passed - who’s to say one of the tabloids does not publish an article on the Amigo rich list if we get to £1 by the end of the year
Other shares that do not have SOA to pass - shareholders will be patted on the back for backing a multi bagger but due to the sensitivity of this situation I simply suggest these posts do not help overall goals
I might be 100% wrong, it’s a thought I’ve been mulling over for a while
But what many posters on this board ( not all) forget along with the mainstream news sites the fca,fos, and most pertinently the so called expert at debt camel is that not everyone bought shares at a low. Huge numbers have held throughout the last year and are right now massively underwater and even should the SOA get passed ( I believe it will all be fine ) will still be at a loss!
Let’s hope the court can see it as well.
You're 100% right jonno41. But the fairness thing is crazy, hard earned invested money, could go either way... And then claiments saying they shouldn't have been given the money, but they have used the money... And need to pay it back,FCA shouldn't be saying it's wrong a handful of people will be rich if it's approved, all people will be in different circumstances all the time....
I fully understand what your saying, and your right, but the FCA attacking shareholders and standing up for what is "right" without being able to quantify what "right" means is ridiculous....
Sorry I posted that in a rush - the point I was trying to make is the FCA and amigo compliance will be reading this BB occasionally or perhaps even often
The FCA know if the scheme passes shareholders will probably see their shares increase significantly in value. At the same the claimants will see their claims decrease significantly in value - the FCA wants fairness
So the more posts from us saying how many shares we are holding implies unfairness to the FCA - which is perhaps partially why they want shareholders pay in some way , so yes on this one occasion I wish none of us would discuss how many shares we hold
In any other scenario with any other shares it makes no difference whether you say how many shares you hold or not.
This is a exceptional situation and if you asked GJ I am 95% sure he would say he wished Vinson did not create and blog about the amount of millionaires Amigo could make
Of course we if the scheme is not passed we all lose money, but again from an. FCA perspective our r risk as shareholders is also not meterial
GLA
Jack...... I am not in that league but I wish you all the best. Viking
.....PI's are investing hard earned cash from working and saving all their lives, you can't just say it isn't fair that some people will become rich, they will become rich because they have worked hard, seen this opportunity and took the plunge and invested, they could lose everything (slim chance now hopefully).
Just because people have took a loan (that they need) now are saying they shouldn't have been given it, can't really say it isn't fair because they aren't in the same job or have the same qualifications as someone else, and that someone else is making money..... You know what I mean? I see people scrimping all day... But they have money for a a flipping £45 a month sky TV bill, they have the money for sniffing, they have the money for smoking.... Surely live within your means
Well said Jonno41.
Jonno. If the FCA require a share issue to shore up the balance sheet, so be it. It has nothing to do with current shareholdings and aspirations for all holders.
My point was informative and tactical, nothing else. Cheers DYOR
Jackeroo - is this kind of bragging one of the reasons Amigo haters are pushing the FCA to block this scheme
Why should PI’s on Vinson’s list and the rest all become millionaires /multi millionaires whilst Amigo customers settle for 10% ish of their claim
Can I suggest you and all other large holders keep your holdings to yourself until Thursday
An unusual request for an unusual situation
Wish you all luck this week
viking. I'm sitting on 3.4m here and 19.6m in RMS; also 3.4m of MXC and 5.9m of MTFB. Once I can top slice any of them, will plough back into SNG, at hopefully 80-90p. I'm not nervous with my exposure; any one of them exploding will more than make up on the loss of another. Unless, of course they all bl.... crash!
jackaroo .......... I dumped mine at a small loss to put in here and have made my loss back, fingers crossed it stays that way this week. ;-)
She/he; can't decide, is also going hell for leather on the RMS forum!!
Xeileance I'm praying alright, based on the evidence , i'm optimistic but if something comes out of the woodwork unexpectedly, then i get jittery. As others many with far more knowledge than me who have stated that FCA are just posturing, showing MPs they tried to get a better deal, I remain cautiously nervous but hopeful the the SOA will be approved.
Dantoinvest, ISA-Investor has said he will do the same again, as long as his calendar is free.
His coverage last time was awesome! It was amazing of him to give up his time to keep us all informed as to what was happening.
Roll on next Wednesday, I am really looking forward to it.
Fingers crossed we will be disembarking the Amigo roller coaster and boarding the Amigo cruise liner heading towards the sunset and calm waters.
I doubt this will be approved on Debt Camel...
Mal says
May 16, 2021 at 4:48 pm
Your comment is awaiting moderation.
If someone cant afford a loan why an earth are they applying for one ? Surely as adults there is a little common sense that if you can’t afford to repay it then please don’t take the loan, spend all the money and then make out you were hard done by ? Did anyone force you to apply and accept the loan, if so you certainly have a case for complaint but don’t hype the complaint culture, what is next take a mortgage holiday and then make out your mortgage is unaffordable and request all the interest back. Take some responsibility for your actions…
Reply
Slyhuntress has got investitist which means should have invested but missed the boat
Elby the timeframe is sit and wait for 62 hours from 1am Monday.. it will be a long day for you.
Cardinal can you pray that judge passes lol
i think he's doing it again mate
On the previous court day, there was someone on here (sorry, can’t remember their name) who attended it virtually and wrote updates. Does anyone know if there is a possibility of that happening again. I’m sure all of us would like that again during this one as its make or break time
The court case is on Wednesday ; )
Does anyone know the timeframe involved with Monday? I’m guessing that the SP will move before the RNS appears, but it would be nice to know if there was an approx timeframe (and yes I appreciate that I’m asking ‘how long is a piece of string’.)