Roundtable Discussion; The Future of Mineral Sands. Watch the video here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
A broken clock is correct twice a day. However, in the case of Ocelot, he is stuck in a time vortex where time is standing still.
You posted "So, imho, cheap, could easily double and might well go higher still."
So when?
For how long ocelot? ...
-----------------
Haven't understood your question, matherdj.
For how long, what?
Some knowledgeable posters (cough) earlier in the year were alluding to the fact the Turkey drill would be done and dusted in next to no time?
UKOG still appear to be waiting for funding?
If the Turkey drill doesn't take place due to lack of funding or they drill a duster, this could easily half in value (and some) dyor
Swizzy Abbott, naysayer plc's chief financial officer, questioning my honesty......I'm ready for that debate anytime....no problem.......snipes at others yet hides behind the filter.....coward springs to mind, like the other romancer Cynderliar
For how long ocelot? Be transparent/honest.
So, imho, cheap, could easily double and might well go higher still.
I may be proven wrong tomorrow, but my hunch is that there will be no fundraise until work on the drill is clearly advancing.
Again, may be wrong, but suspect that relations between UKOG and AME are good, better than a number of PIs have allowed for.
Brillo, careful about calling Ozzy Honest.
Some one might report you as being 'libellous/defamatory'.
;)
Maww diddums
Honest OZZY theirs no IF, you are as we all Know a child.
How's the Life you went off to live? on our last conversation?
I take it not very good as your constantly here.
You sad, sad person
Brillo, here's the reply you are craving " where ignorance is bliss it is folly to be wise "........there now......happy........if I'm in the schoolyard.......you're in the nursery......bedtime now night night.
Honest OZZY once more digresses into his school playground.
Can take from it 'Who cares' about Honest OZZY and his childish views..
H.I.T.S. no your mistake was to try to be clever with a supercillious patronising post....just like your last one ....disruptor, trader, xr prat, nimby?.......who cares........so you quote Latin, who cares.....my guess is nimby
Ozzy, my mistake was clearly answering your question genuinely, calmly and rationally. I obviously shouldn't have bothered.
Perhaps you should look up the meanings of two phrases, namely non sequitur and ad hominem. Both are trite logical fallacies, much adopted by those either suffering from confirmation bias or looking to ignore the truth of things and spin their own narrative for whatever purpose.
Stop it, Honest OZZY
I wish I'd never gave you that spade!!
H.I.T.S, in other words you are a trader trying to get the price down, you don't have to try to disguise it with such a supercillious patronising post.....but then, that's you.....I'm here because I'm invested....and you.......again
Wasting time with Honest OZZY
Lift only goes half way up!
Ozzy, it's really not that difficult.
I have my opinion, which I have already expressed - and backed up with the grounds on which I hold it. However, because I do not automatically assume I am eternally right on everything, I remain interested in seeing any equally supported opinion or indeed counter-opinion. Such things - if supported and thus tenable - may help to further inform my own personal buying and selling decisions.
Told you it wasn't complicated - now, why are you here?
Quiet trading day so far, 31.2m shares.
H.I.T.S, so if we accept your reasoning, what is your ultimate goal.....what do you hope to achieve
Ozzy, I'm well aware that the past is fact and thus unchangeable. I'm also not concerned about "saving" anyone.
What I am doing is expressing and more importantly, justifying a genuinely held opinion on the future. Justifying it with reference to past facts - the "track record and earned credibility" things I mentioned before. There's an awful lot of utterly unjustified and unjustifiable opinions pumped out here. However, it is a guaranteed truth that it's anyone's choice as to whether they pay the slightest attention to my own opinion or completely disregard it. I'm really not bothered either way.
H.I.T.S. noeone is completely disregarding the past.....it's just that we can't change the past....so as investors we must look to the future.....that's what investors do, right or wrong it is our choice.....so not buying your save us from the sinner campaign......we shall overcome
"The market is forward-looking, so investors have to be forward-looking, too."
I despair. The market is indeed forward-looking, in terms of the future value it expects for any company, solely because the market can neither buy nor sell at historic SP levels. That's merely stating the crushingly obvious.
However, one of the absolutely key factors that the market will take account of in formulating its predictions is track record and earned credibility. So if a company has raised tens of millions of pounds based on assurances, promises and estimates, none of which turned out to be anywhere near accurate, the market is going to take such into account when judging future potentials as again being assured, promised and estimated by the same outfit.
Maintaining that the past should be entirely ignored is just plain insane. Or deliberately deceptive. The past informs the future.
Thanks, Batman......why didn't you save us all earlier.........and the band played.believe it if you like