Charles Jillings, CEO of Utilico, energized by strong economic momentum across Latin America. Watch the video here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
Wow. Flattered that you wrote me a play, pad, but elected not to read it. If it's as original as your 'research' posts I'll be asleep on the job! 🥰
“Please Miss?”
“Yes Agar1981”.
“That Nasty Addicknt and those Solg Luddites keep picking on me and I’ve done more research than them”.
“Never mind Agar1981, perhaps you can share that brilliant research with them instead of just sniping and being disruptive for the past hundreds of posts?”
“But I can’t Miss, I haven’t really done any research”.
“You naughty Agar1981, now go and stand in the corner with your dunces cap on”.
“Not again Miss. Anyway the corners are already full with my other dunce clown friends including Kalneedabari”.
Another great find - thanks Pad.
Z
If I cared about people clicking recommend I'd just point to the errors in Red's ramping- that always gets a good reaction, but it feels a bit like kicking an old, sick, deluded dog.
Who is the teacher in your little skit there, add? As far as I can see this comes down to you and me. I want to talk solg from a realistic standpoint, you evade any scrutiny by deflection. Have you come up with any way in which I've been wrong about solg? Can you point to a post in your enormous back catalog where you've said something about solg that was insightful and then proven to be correct? Anything at all? I'll wait 👍
Oh dear! The poor lad's developed a nasty case of tick envy. And he talks about toddler behaviour without in any way recognising his performance is a bit like the class swot who puts his hand up to every question; " Me sir! Me sir!" and is roundly ignored by the teacher.
Let's take Pad's heavily recommended article below (look at all those thumbs 👏). People with a news feed set up will have received the same thing and ignored it, as there's nothing new in it. It's of zero interest to a knowledgeable investor. Instead it gets pasted here (no disrespect to Pad: he's just following what everyone else on this board does) and it gets up ticked by people who, I'd argue, aren't doing sufficient quality research themselves. Or they like repetition, like a toddler likes repetition. But wouldn't it be great if this board actually discussed some new ideas, like someone using examples of other royalty deals from franco to outline how solg might finance the staged mine plan they've talked of recently?
No- that gets shot down by luddites who haven't done much reading and think they understand mineral financing because they once worked in an office. If you always do what you've always done, you'll always have what you've always had and this board will remain meh.
Your fixation with my year of birth is weird (it was feb 1981, if you're that interested?) and jealousy is a weak emotion. I'm sorry that I've been right about solg, really I am- the daydreamer in me wishes your cries of 'hope so' and 'this is significant' were true, but the intelligent part of my brain tells me to trust the research and stick to my investment plan. As I've said before, if you want any advice you just need to ask. Don't gamble on hope and do read some more 👍
Https://www.juiciocrudo.com/articulo/amp/ecuador-y-solgold-negocian-en-torno-a-cascabel/40763
Ecuador maintains negotiations with the Australian company SolGold with a view to passing, this year, to the exploitation stage. Thus, the company will be qualified for the construction of the mine of around $3,000 million, Cascabel, in the province of Imbabura.
The Minister of Energy and Mines, Fernando Santos, said that for now the economic issue and the amount of royalties from the copper, silver and gold project are being discussed. According to the law, royalties must be between 5% and 8% of production.
Among the plans for production from the mine is the construction of a pipeline to transport the material to the port of Esmeraldas and from there to its final destination.
The Alpala deposit is the main objective of the Cascabel concession.
In April 2022, the pre-feasibility study confirmed the world-class potential of the project to become a large, low-cost, long-duration mining operation.
Once built, Cascabel is expected to be one of the top 20 copper and gold mines in South America.
For such a young man your memory seems a bit faulty, perhaps a trip to your doctor may be advisable. You appear to have completely, and conveniently, forgotten what you said in your 1981 guise. I haven't, and neither have many others on here.
Anyway, time you got on with some work, us older folk need you to pay your taxes for our pension and zimmer frames.
Are you going to come out and say you're jealous of my 'youth', add, or will you just keep trying to patronize?
I have never manipulated the market. I satirised the ridiculous nonsense some on here write, and the SP moved, but any connection between the two is made by you. The people I have bought stock for are generally happy as they all know what I know- investing is a younger man's game and you sometimes need a few years to make a decent profit, as will be true here.
Listen, I think you're a bit deranged but I don't wish you any harm, and I'm not sure you should spend so much time thinking about me. Let's agree that I've been correct in cautioning against undue excitement here, and leave it at that. I'll still call you and others out when you get giddy over nothing, but it isn't personal ❤️
Sadly, you missed the point - again. I was referring to the bs you came up with when you claimed to be manipulating the market on behalf of a client you were advising. Admittedly, this was whilst you were using your 1981 moniker, so perhaps you prefer to forget about it. And yes, yesterday was highly significant, regardless of the lack of market reaction. Oh, and sorry for not realising you are also an expert on Ecuadorian constitutional matters. My bad, as I believe you kids would say.
By the way, the emoji thing is probably better being used on Instagram or Facebook, or whatever other social media site the children use.
Only 2,000 shares traded (£340) in the first 90 minutes...
And no Auto trades...
Tumbleweed in the market as well as on here...?
Let's hope so, Q. Otherwise it's unlikely to be worth listening to.
I might suggest you weren't running the business very well if you were flat out? 🤷♂️
As you say, lots of people enjoyed my story and the SP did swing over 10% on small volume. make of that what you will. As for people I provide investment advice to, and buy on behalf of? They've made better choices than you, it would seem. I won't offer you any investment advice, I will simply point out that I've not been wrong about solg at any point. Yesterday you said that the term renewal on one of our concessions was significant. I contested it wasn't, and the markets have once again been so kind as to prove me right and you wrong.
Benefits of being a 42 year old with other people to do the hard work? I can read extensively about mining. Solg isn't my only investment, but it's the only one with an LSE board full of rampy morons who need their wings clipping. I don't think you've read a fraction of what I have about LatAm mine development, about Ecuadorian constitutional affairs, about funding... If you had, you'd realise I don't hit and hope. I read and invest. I said no TO before the '23 AGM and was told I had no clue. Months later a lot of those detractors are getting nervous as it becomes very clear I understood the path walked by solg better than them. If you want me to tell you what I think actually happens next, you can ask me for investment advice 😊
9 jobs dispatched onto today, and I'm still typing... That's good business 👍
I am unsure if we have more news to come.
Solgold must have known that the Cascabel license extension was due yesterday.
So why not hold the presentation yesterday afternoon.
Maybe we get another RNS Thursday morning.
Bizgas, to consolidate my position ref your attention seeking lies.
I may be uneducated, but if as you ridiculucy clame, you are friends wif mather. Isn't THERE rules to stop people promoting shares of THERE friends companies on a public board. Isn't it I cider feeling or soming
Re yesterday’s RNS ......
Phew.
Addicknt
Posters will only be able to contextualise their posts depending on whether they are positive or negative. Negative posters cannot believe the positivity of some posters based on the news from the company over the past several years.
Take DBW for example if an RNS landed saying a nuclear bomb had been dropped on Ecuador he would view that as positive as no one else would be able to take SOLG’s licences whereas the actual facts are it would be disastrous.
Reminds me of a former prolific poster in one of DBW’s previous investments, which by the way he was in so deep with his gambling it affected his health, who when the said company lent money to Frank Timmis ( google him) it was a great investment. Needless to say the ceo of that company is currently about to go to jail for corruption and embezzlement.
You would think DBW would learn by his mistakes, obviously not……
Now showing 1.9 down opening. Tut
Bizy. Parent not patent. Typo mate.
And as for my lack of education, better to be thick, than a downright liar.
Mates with nm. Funniest thing I've ever read.
Also mate. You need help with your attention seeking lies. Far more than I need educating.
Opening 1.5% down again today. Tut
Who are these 2 posters agarcu and needalife everyone keeps mentioning ? they both sound like a couple of desperate school kids who should think about applying some of their energy to charitable causes and hopefully do some good to each of their neighbourhoods...
Have a great day all riches in our reach 🤑🤑🤑
NAL maybe get an education as well as a life. Patents? There instead of their. Maybe stay off the sauce when you are posting. Yep really sad.
AgArCu, in fairness I will concede your posts yesterday did attempt to 'contextualise' the announcement, albeit from your habitual position of negativity. However, the problem you have is that people don't believe you, and with good reason.
It wasn't that long ago that you were telling us you'd successfully manipulated the share in order to fulfil a client's purchases - the clear implication being you were a finance professional. Now you tell us you are in construction. Maybe you've had a recent career change? In any event, I don't know about other folk, but I don't tend to go to construction workers for financial advice. Then there's your story about hotel meetings and Chinese executives - incidentally, I rather enjoyed that one, but some people appeared to be dangerously taken in by it.
And then there's the issue of your backstory. You tell us you are 42 years old and run your own business. When I was in that position at your age I didn't have a spare minute in the day and I certainly didn't have time to spend hours posting on social media (it didn't exist then, but you get my point)
I take it you can see the problem? Your invented stories mean you have no credibility, so it's little wonder other posters question your motivation.
Sometimes when my little grandkids are desperate for something, and there patents have told them no. They make up all sorts of reasons why they should be allowed. And the longer it goes the more desperate they get.
Adick, fort, dbw, and several others remind me of them.
There posts are showing more and more desperation by the day. And the reasons everything is good news get more pleading every day.
Sad really