We would love to hear your thoughts about our site and services, please take our survey here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
SNP abandons it’s first major net zero plan haha
Only a total moron can’t see that all
This rubbish is unaffordable, infeasible and unnecessary
Nothing to do wth krankie’s beard knocking a camper van of course
Whatever the trigger, it’s deeply satisfying to be right yet again. EVs fooked, net zero fooked. Next!
Jeeez HFM I see the conspiratorial theorists have got to you to if you bother to listen to a wider selection of her media performances she surely must have some huge splinters on her backside 😉
Be careful with thinking you are an erudite person and promoting a false narrative and so what if WW3 has started there is absolutely nothing you or I can do about it 🤷♂️
HFM you speak a lot of sense, it’s as rare a commodity on this forum as our gold is to the world
Imagine everyone on this forum getting together for a pint? It would be carnage
@shipright... it started a while ago. Wars are no longer as we knew them... listen to this interview from Pippa Malmgrem ( both her and her father were presidential advisors and she's super smart )
She mentions a lot that's well know in certain circles but not in the mainstream press. If you have an interest in geopolitics or even just how it may impact markets, this will be the best thing you've heard in ages.
https://youtu.be/5r3J-dNG6g0?si=aZkawQaSstqmmA0P
@Damers, still up for that pint in the stammy once this gets flogged... anyone else in the South Manchester area also welcome - even City fans ;-)
Enjoy.
It’ll all be over soon gents… Israel and Iran will make peace and putin will invite zhelensky over for lunch and agree to give them all the illegally annexed lands and thirdly solgold will go to a joint bid from china and Russia for a knock out bid of £3 per share !!! Dam that covid vaccine was good 😉
55p someday soon!!!
Damers, that's a car park scrap
We can't have WW3 whilst climate change is headline news ffs. Whatever will Greta and just stop oil folks do with their time then?
I think it started some time ago, at Least in terms of pre war activities. Softening up the west and making its people feeble and divided
Militarily, Putin probably started it when he hopped over the neighbours fence for a nice of cup of tea.
The basket case nations are all posturing now and China with the globalist elites who’ve pulled off a coup are pulling the strings
Terrible times ahead. Get it sold Scott so we can afford to build up tins of spam and corned beef for reserves
When the contributers to this BB meet face to face.
When do you think it will start?
Nice try add. Clearly the market favoured previous management efforts, which is why the SP has collapsed under the current clowns. Map our MCap against who was in charge. What was the average under NM, DC and SC. Then tell me Scott is doing a good job 🤣
He will likely be long gone when, in late 25 or more likely 26, we finally get an offer.
That's an alternative view.
Which is more likely the cause of them leaving it this late to make an announcement:
1) they have loads of options
2)they are stuck for options?
Just try a bit of Occam's razor here. You need to tie yourself in knots to try and explain why they'd leave it late and allow the SP to sit so low on finance fears if there were options. Option 2 is the simplest explanation, so it almost certainly reflects the truth. We'll see if someone takes pity on solg... In the absence of charity, it will be dilutive as I've always said, and that won't help our SP one bit.
SH, at last we agree upon something!
Up until SC was appointed and power was wrested away from NM and his band of merry hangers-on, the management and strategy were dreadful. At long last we have a team with a realistic and deliverable plan.(you may not agree with that bit)
Yes, I 'follow'
An alternative view is the company is going through various options and negotiating the best possible deal.
Can’t wait 😉
NMM, you’re aiming that at the kind of moron who holds stock long that he thinks is going down 🤪🤪🤪🤪🤪🤪🤪🤪
Never argue with an idiot, they will drag you down to their level then beat you when experience
Just block the khunt
If we were well managed and had stuck to a single, sensible plan over the last 5 years we'd be a long way north of here. I have no doubt management would consider almost anything at the moment- my contention is that they haven't been inundated with offers, and that's the reason it's going to the wire.
If they had lots of options, those options would have existed for a while and they'd have chosen by now... Follow?
Will try again...
Stackhigh - do you consider a sub-£300m MCap to be too high for a company which owns 100% of Cascabel and various regionals at different stages of exploration?
I'm sure SOLG management are working through a number of viable options re: financing. Sure, it is unlikely one of these is a bid of 60p+. But it doesn't need to be at the moment.
Get a cash runway of 1-2 years and show the phased approach is possible. That may force interested parties to act.
Stackhigh - do you consider a
Should I join the brainless rampers and pretend everything is good for solg, add? Would that please you? We'll just ignore what's happened to our market cap, and the fact we're about to run out of money with no details of any options, let alone a plan.
My claims: riding roughshod over the Geneva convention will be bad for future investment. Your reply: Rinehart has announced an investment she could have stopped but didn't, therefore I'm wrong. Can you see the irony about definitive statements? I should 'accept the fact'? One swallow, and all that...
When the fundraise happens, and it is bad for PIs, may I say 'I told you so'? Because your naive apparent believe (which I'm sure is disingenuous) that it'll all be fine for PIs is not only wrong but also always delivered with such sanctimonious pomp. Time will show readers here who is right (again) 👍
Don’t upset byronramperbaygold then.
He’ll be wanting to show you his photoshopped holding on telegram…..
Poor old BBG 118 days left and 120p just keeps on getting further away…..exciting stuff for the king of 🤡
Over the last hour of trading there were blocks of 17, 592, 17,692 and 18,076 shares being repeatedly bought and then sold. About £1700 a trade. This hokey-cokey presumably keeps the SP in a fairly narrow band for who's purpose?
Just walked in...looked at my screen...everry one of the last 60 trades Autobots....
When will this ever end...???!!!
SH, I love it when you make your definitive statements - they're nothing more than speculation and you know it. The ONLY guidance we have on this matter has come from the company itself, and no disrespect, but I think they may be closer to affairs than a lad running a small building firm in the North of England.
As for your point 2, I believe you're wrong and the numerous articles which have appeared today suggest the latest deal was signed in recent days. She's committed $300m to Ecuador in recent weeks and even if they've been in discussions for some time, which they will have been, she could have pulled out if she was concerned about the impact of the Mexican situation. She quite clearly isn't.
You are desperate to find a justification for your gloomy prognosis, sadly for you Rinehart isn't delivering on your agenda - quite the opposite. You'll feel better if you accept the fact and find something else to moan about. Suggestion: keep banging on about the "car crash" funding right up to the moment of the announcement. But make sure you've got your reverse ferret boots on and have a ready supply of "I didn't say that" posts to hand.
Add, you're doing your usual trick of slowly trying to make this less relevant, presumably to gloss over the conversation about where our funding is actually going to come from (clue- it won't be 'non-dilutive'), but I'll bite, just for you.
1) sticking to your guns and stating the same thing again isn't "back peddling". I said the president's behaviour would damage investor confidence and I stand by that: no change in stance.
2) for the third and final time, the investments announced last week and this were not penned yesterday or even last month. They represent the final 'reveal' of negotiations that will have been ongoing since before lasso stepped down. What they don't represent (and I know you know this, so I assume you are playing dumb?) is an endorsement of recent 'strongman' politics. If you believe deals announced now are the work of a couple of days, that might explain why you think there's more going on at solg than there is?