The latest Investing Matters Podcast episode featuring Jeremy Skillington, CEO of Poolbeg Pharma has just been released. Listen here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
With a 10% rise in the stock and price monitoring might I suggest their are very few sellers around at these levels and market makers are short of stock.
Volume incredibly low again which is so disappointing. Of course there’s a long way to go but I can’t believe the recent partnership news alone has not rocketed the SP up to and past 175p - the price at the last and quite recent capital raise!!!
Parts of the video!
“Orders of magnitude than what we’ve done in the past”
“We are in the process of scaling up the production to meet the demand”
Another few months, we should see more progress, as Larry pointed out these all take time; so we need to give him and the team some space!
So far, he has delivered more than we could have dreamed of whilst under the suspension period, back in the old Red days!
PC
Seriously what planet are you from?! If anyone else would like me to prove what I’m saying is true - flight tickets etc then happy to do so , please email me at alexlittlepap@homail.co.uk . Kindest Regards Alex.
Yeah, I guess you must 'of' indeed. Sigh.....
My mistake I must of made it all up. Honestly I understand now why Alfa thinks your complete baffoon?!
well, you've been told wrong and I think we can let objective reality be the judge and not your 'visit' to avalon 2 years ago when the world was a completely different place. otherwise, bye
Bluerill this is my first and last post here as not a holder but honestly mate you haven’t a clue what’s been going on between Invinity and Bushveld so give it a rest . I visited Avalon HQ two years ago just outside San Francisco, Bushveld was always critical for invinitys success and quite frankly you would not be sitting at a shareprice so high as it is now. Further more from my sources I’ve been told the relationship that both firms have now is excellent and like it or not Bushveld will be working with invinity for many years to come.
spare me the flaccid shout from the sideline, audio. This is important stuff and you need to see that and pick a side instead of appealing to god so you can go back to trying to benefit from other people's work. I'll stop when we it's appropriate and not a moment sooner.
For the love of god give it a rest will you.
This bickering and arrogance is getting pretty boring to be honest
Final word: although I completely stand by what I have written both publicly and privately, it needs to be emphasised here: reprinting private messages in order to try and somehow embarrass or worse, someone who aggressively disagrees with you, is pretty much the slimiest thing anyone can do in this message board/opinion game, not least because no one reading it can ever be sure that it wasn't doctored or even made up from whole cloth in the first place. Out of order on steroids I'd say.
Following on: other than not joining in the hallelujah chorus and praising the righteous genius of Fortune and providing an alternative narrative based on my knowledge of capital markets, Inviity and real events that have happened in the real world, gimme one thing I've 'raved' about Alfa. Mindless putz
thankyou, GKahn. It is a small issue in the overall scheme of things of course, but I have been in markets a long time and I have rarely seen such slavish devotion to a company and its management as I have with Fortune and Bushveld but because there are a non-negligible number of posters here who own both shares, their cultish behaviour has become our problem to some extent. When BMN unceremoniously dumped their stake in IES and drove our share price down, you would have thought it would be obvious to those people that at least at that point, trying to come on this board and somehow spin Bushveld's actions in a positive light or really commenting on BMN at all, might no longer be appropriate. Its nice to have support. As for Alfa, since my private message to him that he has reprinted is precisely consistent with what I have written here publicly, I can only assume that it is the actions of a bitter person who has lost the argument and so resorts to ad hominem attacks. So I have to ask, Who's the nutjob in this scenario?
happy to quote precisely what you messaged me yesterday:
"last request: please reach out to these sanchez-type guys and encourage them to take their comments back to the BMN board. I have 0 ****s to give and I won't tolerate any more nonsense about Bushveld on the Invinity board. I really wish BMN no harm but I won't let anyone try and gin up Bushveld's role anymore. I've told you for months that you need to really review Bushveld's status and back off the almost blind admiration you people seem to have for Fortune. It is truly almost cultish, Trump-like, in light of the facts staring you in the face."
You are starting to sound like a raving nutjob now so I suggest that you stop posting whilst you have any credibility to protect.
Bluerill - excellent post re Alfacomp who is totally out of order - many thanks
Maybe you should thought about that months ago alfa, when you initially reached out to ME privately in the hopes of co-ordinating messaging, you flaming hypocrite. As for 'getting you to stop posting', that's just a lie. My (until now) private attempt was to get you to recognise that this is not the Bushveld board in the first place and that if you continue to ignore that fact, I would have no choice but to embarrass you and talk some truth about BMN you doubtless would not like. But you persist so I will explain again: you are simply wrong and the more you write the wrong-er you get. You know nothing about this deal nor how Siemens was 'looking' at it. V supply of any description was an afterthought because of what has already been reported on this board and as I explained, the clear EVIDENCE is Bushveld/Fortune had NOTHING to do with structuring or negotiating this deal in any way. Attempting to big-up Bushveld here is getting embarrassing. There are important reasons BMN's share price has so desperately languished. Mick Davis did not choose FAR's assets over Bushveld's by accident and BMN did not sell their shares in Invinity and effectively abandon its dream of being a 'fully integrated producer' because their work was done with IES or any other such nonsense. Davis chose FAR and Fortune was forced to sell his Invinity stake for the same suite of reasons and THAT's what the BMN is screaming at you but you're too far gone to hear. Now I say again: this is the IES board and no matter our (deep) differences, you have little standing to keep attempting to promote another company which has increasingly little to do with Invinity and has in fact done some real damage recently to its capital structure and share price.
bluerill - please can you stop sending me private messages telling me to stop posting on this board.
For everyone else - Vanadium is critical to VRFB's more than any other battery technology is dependent on any other single element. On a good day 30%+ of the VRFB cost is the Vanadium, on a bad day it can be 60%+. RedT, Avalon and Rongke power all had very bad days in the last 3 years when Vanadium prices spiked above USD 100/Kg - in fact Rongke had to completely pause their 800MWh Dalian project.
If anyone thinks that a company of the stature of Siemens is going to touch a technology like VRFBs without having a Vanadium supply of the depth and quality of Bushveld's Vametco/Vanchem/Mokopane then their are in fantasyland. Siemens will have been brought to the party by Bushveld and may already have picked up some of their shares as part of their overall buy-in process, because let's be frank big companies expect favours like that to be given to them for involvement.
Following on from your comments, blahblah, this is from Canaccord's upgrade today: "....The deal is a major vote of confidence
in Invinity and its technology, and opens up an additional sales channel to add to the company's existing markets in grid service and behind-the-meter. We see this as a substantial increase in confidence in the outlook for Invinity. Canaccord
raises its rating on the London-listed company to buy from speculative buy. The price target is unchanged at 260p...." Funny that. Not a word about how massively important Bushveld and its management were in getting this deal over the line.
Thanks for the link Hintza, what a great day for shareholders here. I think Zulch's last point about credibility is key, especially given Bluerill's points about the failure, in that regard, of other companies in the wider sector. This deal is reputation-enhancing and ensures our place at the forefront of the next product wave. We still have to deliver, and Gamesa can cancel if milestones are not met, but if they believe in our tech, after a long hard look, we certainly should - more than ever!
VSA Capital's Andrew Monk speaks to Invinity Energy Systems Larry Zulch following the announcement of the strategic partnership with Siemens Gamesa Renewable Energy
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-7reuRfSft4&ab_channel=VSACapital
Siemens Gamesa & Invinity Energy - Joint Development of Grid-Scale Flow Battery polaris.brighterir.com/public/invinity/news/rns/story/w3me3yx Invinity Energy Nexus Limited, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Invinity Energy Systems plc (AIM:IES) is pleased to announce it has entered into a Joint Development and Commercialization Agreement ("JDCA") with Gamesa Electric S.A.U. ("Gamesa Electric"), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Siemens Gamesa Renewable Energy ("SGRE"), to: · jointly develop a grid-scale vanadium flow battery ("VFB") based on Invinity's proven technology and incorporating Gamesa Electric's advanced power conversion systems; · cooperatively manufacture the VFB upon achieving a jointly validated design; and · commercialize the VFB through each company's sales channels.