George Frangeskides, Chairman at ALBA, explains why the Pilbara Lithium option ‘was too good to miss’. Watch the video here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
"Positive evaluation by Paul-Ehrlich-Institut:
Sensitivity of 95% at Ct < 25; Manufacturer specificity: 99.6% "( extract from the Dräger Safety AG &
Co. KGaA listing)
When "Clinical performance
As reported by independent validation studies" is as stated above
they are all Nucleocapsid protein or unknown so no spike protein ones listed so maybe similar problem to PD even if Clinical evaluation study conducted at Hospital Carlos III and Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid is acceptable Ehrlich could be using Cobas 6000 too for their retrospective in vitro study (I would suggest, inevitably are to get through workload). Ehrlich seems to use < or = 25 but I think it might be the spikes spiking our listing here.
Is there another validation route or can AS just show them up with data to hand on parallel hua studies?
I have to agree here agent. You’ve been on this board as long as most and you’re a smart woman. Very smart. I totally agree with your view on the vax, it shouldn’t be given to the young and invulnerable, especially since it seems to have no effect on the spread, but it’s clearly having a positive effect on deaths of the elderly. I distrust the UKGov as much as anyone, hammering on about it to the point of obsession isn’t healthy. This is the U.K. it’s built on back hand snideyness. And in all honesty I think Bill Gates has done an awful lot of good for the world. We all get it here, but look after your own and your health as you see fit. Fighting the power is admirable, but you’ll never win. At the end of the day we’re all worm food. Do what makes you content with regards to vax etc (I get it’s hard when the gov try to corner us all) but for Christ sake, don’t let it dominate your life.
Imo yes!
I say this with respect as you have also done a significant amount of research here… and I’m not fan of this supposed ‘Brexit’ government in not supporting British business and spending billions on Chinese crap but…. the amount you post on bill gates and conspiracy theories and anti vax agendas really doesn’t lend much in the way of credibility, or balance. It is kind of distinctly biased and imho more than a little akin to howling at the moon (i.e. it does no good and just clogs up the board).
I’m sure it might not be received as such, but is it said from a good place.
Agent - I don’t want to throw abuse, I’m not that way. And tired.
Your views are your views. Just not relevant in their extremes for this board. That’s all.
BITL, I have only ever objected to vaccine coercion and the fact that Bill Gates has supranational healthcare influence. Does that really make me a loony?
Have some patience Jesus!! we have submitted the test for approval, only a matter of time! as for any conspiracies etc you have been watching to much X-files next you will think we are all part of the matrix!! Take a step back and relax! Imo
Sorry, but I warned everyone on 14Th Sept (post of 14:52) that we didn’t appear on ANY Gov recommended LFT lists. Sometimes the conspiracy theory fits with the reality. An accurate LFT has been superfluous to requirements while the goal has been mass vaccination.
Europe
On Tuesday,11 May, the European Union’s Health Security Committee(HSC) updated the common list of Covid-19 rapid antigen tests approved in the European Union (see EUROPEB12661A21). This list now includes 83 antigen tests, and for35 of them, the results are mutually recognised by all 27 Member States. Latest list is shown in this document in Annex1 https://ec.europa.eu/health/sites/default/files/preparedness_response/docs/covid-19_rat_common-list_en.pdf.
AffiDX does not appear.
Then we shall simply beg to differ.. your view based on your understanding.. and my view based on mine..
I am however encouraged to hear your view on 'vax coercion' and I find the more we learn and the more we know.. our beliefs and perspectives can change!!
At the end of the day we all want Lft and especially AVA to succeed
But they are conspiracy theories. Silly in the main. Totally agree with the vaccine coercion, too quick etc. People should be allowed to make their own decision without being given an ultimatum.
Anyway. LFT and AVA are more important.
BITL
On your last paragraph we agree.. but you do yourself no favours by referring to 'conspiracy theories' ..by repeating that trope.. you have been seduced like all the other blue pillers. Agent is one of the very few people prepared to publically challenge a narrative that has seduced almost everyone. Those that respond with infantile abuse simply reveal their true nature.
Meta - I think people get bored by the constant conspiracy theories. Agent is clearly clued up, knows their stuff on this investment. Assume FTS is just fed up - as a lot of us are.
The constant wild theories are exhausting. No relevance to the topic in question.
Add some perspective. We’re invested in a product that can logically save a load of hassle and cure cancer. Let’s focus on that.
Looks like the blue pillers are out in force tonight!!
Fun time swing leading the charge? If only you were fun.. sigh..
Agent, are you a former mud wrestler ? but now prefer soaping up :-) Anyhow, the letter with your operation appointment will be arriving soon, hope it goes well for all our sake.
FTS, the feeling is mutual (if you have any.)
First person I’ve ever filtered.
What a total moron you are agent.
I feel so sorry for your children.
“Let’s go Soapy!”
Great to see we are finally getting closer to compulsory vaccination for all the world and the anti vaccine brigade will all be chipped in order to track their extremely dodgy movements. The government has finally come to its senses and hopefully the non compliant will now see common sense and get the operation to have their heads removed from their arses.
Haha, that the TO @ £50per share ;) 2021 folks
Hence we appear in this database
https://covid-19-diagnostics.jrc.ec.europa.eu/devices/detail/2426
With these entries:
HSC common list x No
HSC mutual recognition x No
Wow an RNS from the future. Is it us?
See RNS 11/6/22.
Avacta are not on the most recent list as of 20 Oct 2021.
https://ec.europa.eu/health/sites/default/files/preparedness_response/docs/covid-19_rat_common-list_en.pdf
Reason is probably the lack of an independent validation study according to the requirement below:
“C. have been validated by at least one Member State as being appropriate for their use in the context of COVID-19, providing details on the methodology and results of such studies, such as the sample type used for validation, the setting in which the use of the test was assessed, and whether any difficulties occurred as regards the required sensitivity criteria or other performance elements.”
The vast majority of tests on the list have been evaluated by the Paul-Ehrlich-Institut:
However this list does not include any rapid antigen self tests. It is only for those tests administered by a health professionals.
If our test was still awaiting approval or rejected why would we not be on the list. Could it not the case that it passed?
AgentB, give it a rest, Are you not embarrassed that everyone on here mugs you off?
You complain about misinformation being spread… have you not considered that it is you who could be wrong?
Maybe take your dog for a walk again?
Don’t forget the tinfoil hat you massive weirdo.