Gordon Stein, CFO of CleanTech Lithium, explains why CTL acquired the 23 Laguna Verde licenses. Watch the video here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
Agree swest but what we don't want is to hang around whilst PLL dither and delay our plans ..lets just hope they secure financing in good time
Agree with that.
A strong PLL is what we want, I'm not so sure its what we have, I sense a feint air of procrastination from KP, just my own opinion. PLL SP struggles, as does ours, but we are different, we have 'the rock', and not much capex needed in big scheme of things, still pretty 'agile' i.e very buildable and near term, much smaller than PLL
I think KP is less able to be so sure footed than he used to be in light of his SP, I'm not totally convinced they'll come up with the readies, happy to be proved otherwise
Ultimately, we have options. Lets see.
I have said in the past that Piedmonts access to funds for Ewoyaa may be weighing on our sp and I thought Phillips was a little blase about it and when pushed was not totally convincing as there were a few ifs and maybes ..there is a good chance it will resolve itself in good time but a little uncertainty and we know markets do not like that !
That should be: Concentrate suuply shortfall vs demand ahead is obvious.
China in the early years while the US and Europe fanny.
Tennessee will be late, Tesla and LG are fully supplied from NAL? It looks more probable all Ewoyaa sc6 will go to China then.
That Piedmont where saying they did not want to dilute and that NAL sales have provided little cash flow was putting a cloud over whether Piedmont might delay the Ewoyaa capex FID was my thinking on why so much down pressure on the ALL sp. This decision to follow Atlantic down the up front cash for capex off take route solves that. Only game in town?
Concentrate demand shortfall ahead is obvious.
Onward.
More on Ewoyaa from 31.45.
First on Ewoyaa from 3.25 in.
Piedmont proposing their own offtake for their share of product.
https://youtu.be/uVjMlfggkzY?si=kAmRNYK2ymGp_-W7
Well to be fair, she is the Finance Director and Company Secretary. In my view, she does a pretty good job in that respect and I would say that the Company communication via podcasts, various media platforms and "X" is far better than any other company I invest in. So whilst I agree that umms and aaars are a little off-putting, the end result is what matters most.
I don’t like listening to someone who keeps saying um when speaking,not a confident speaking person.hope I am wrong
Https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eXfoWbe6ZxA
Amanda advises at 13.28 on the Rock Stock interview.
Any further idea on when this will list on the GSE after NH’s tweet the other day? GLA. CJ.
*Q2 2025 but you get my drift
I think offtaker interest is in securing supply for 2026, when according to forecasts spod to be in higher demand. ALL were also clear with their terms from the outset. They're looking for a strategic partner, not going to the market cap in hand so to speak. They could walk away in fact, knowing that sales will start from DMS Q1 2025 plus the further investment from MIIF due
The alternative to an offtaker getting more favourable pricing for providing funds in advance of delivery with a multi year deal is that their cash buys assets at the deal point in time, eg as Piedmont did. Atlantic have not ever mooted this possibility (which would obviously be dilutive to holders) afaict.
Whatever, getting this finance is paramount to project success. A massive risk eliminated.
Jlite it's not an upfront payment - it's a facility that ALL can draw down upon as and when needed like the existing PLL arrangement
Piedmont paying market price. At no point have they said 2nd offtaker gets any favourable terms such as cheaper product. It's unlikely when there are 6 competing and bidding for access to the supply in the final round of talks. Plenty of deals like this and most likely outcome is the offtaker pays the spot price like the majority do and like Piedmont is.
Bring on the news.
PD also to add to your list for potential SP movers:
-Assore 33p+ bid
-MiiF $28MILLION paid in
-ML to be ratified
-$70-100mil offtaker announcement
*EPA permit
*Resource upgrade
*Feldspar report
I know we don't know the formula that will be used but the price Piedmont will be paying should be near to market price if I understood the terms of their deal correctly
Thanks Gaias. That sums it up pretty well. Way better than my post!
My worry was how much of the value they have to give away to get the $75m-$100m up front cash they need to develop the mine and continue exploring. If they have to give away too much, then the majority of the first 3-5 years of profits are effectively used up to develop the mine. So decent profit wouldn't kick until year 4-6 depending on the deal.
Not long to wait now though, and with so many potential positive catalysts over the coming quarters, I am not letting any go.
JL
Any potential offtaker will get a discount for providing up front cash. Commod deals I've seen over the years ranged from around 1/4 off to 2/3rds dependent on many factors. Hopefully Atlantic achieve a small discount as it's not long to delivering.
Inevitable the early years bottom line will be hit compared to them getting unencumbered pricing. An example:
SC6 spot 1600, aic 800, deal size 100k/y over 5y, cash up front 60m.
Customer discount say 40% - ie for paying say 60m up front they get 100m off the spot over 5y. 20m/y ie pay 1400/t simplistically that will cut 1/4 off cash flow. That impact highly dependent on spot price. Many variations possible.
A deal should be on av good for valuation but a poor deal for Atlantic could be negative. They won't!!
Just out of interest if Atlantics financial commitments are met via offtake /Piedmont etc why will they not start making after production starts ..not sure on your take there Jlite
I agree. The offtake will be really interesting. In the last presentation, it was clear that only 30% of the output was up for grabs, leaving the final 20% unaccounted for. I assume the remaining 20% is MIIFs 19% share leaving 1% spare each month. Is that correct? If so, ALL are fully funded for the development but won't make any money for a little while after production commences. Which possibly explains some of the SP weakness.
JL
Perchance ?
What will move the SP, and mb prompt a bid, even, is the offtake agreement that we are expecting to provide the balance of capex funding needed.
Neil has been v bullish over this , painting a picture of ALL having several options.
When THAT news lands, we're off.