Gordon Stein, CFO of CleanTech Lithium, explains why CTL acquired the 23 Laguna Verde licenses. Watch the video here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
The thing is, they can throw out ALL the tweets they want, they are pretty much worthless, along with EVERYTHING this outfit has put it's hands on since day one.
You cannot take tweets to Tesco's and pay for your shopping, just valueless carp from the infamous leader and his cohorts.
Management showed its determination to pass the resolutions at the GM by financing, and issuing shares to, the Equity Benefit Trust.
There are posters who suggest they did this in order to receive their remuneration a while longer.
Imho, the explanation is to be sought elsewhere.
Currently heading the % losers.
People need to realize that buying 1562 shares for a £1 is not a good investment choice, even more so, when UKOG are hunting for cash to stay afloat - the End is Nigh.
Cut your losses and get out !!!!!
One more last attempt to raise cash. 0.005 then its over as people are sick of buying these shares at lower and lower prices. Perhaps one more consolidation? lol
I suspect he's being paid to post so will stick around until the money dries up.
Wonder how some of the more vociferous supporters are doing? Especially the ' just averaged down brigade who bought more before the consolidation and further drop .?
Last one out turn the lights off, ocelot the dishonour is yours…
It’s amazing how silent this board can get, but then on the other hand there’s nothing realistic to speak about, good luck to anyone genuinely trapped in here! I hope you can find an escape somewhere! As I did a few years ago, I still hold enough confetti that enables me to post on here…
UKOG may be in discussion with several investors for the Portland Port project but UKOG has been pushing that narrative since December:-
'UKOG@UKOGlistedonAIM
·Dec 5, 2023
UK ENERGY STORAGE LTD: Portland Port hydrogen storage business gets significant boost in the space of a few days after positive discussions with two of world’s giant trading companies, Japanese Sumitomo, and US ExxonMobil. The countdown to lift off begins...'
Not sure what the countdown started at - or have there been a few failures at 'lift off'.
So that's 2050 sorted, even though there's not even a planning application been put in yet.
What about all those things that are meant to be be happening now, in what anybody investing over the past 9 years would consider the core O&G E&P business.
Has UKOG really not done all those things at HH that is so great they want to farm out 49% for a pittance relative to what they paid to get to 86%, and watched the SP collapse because of the legal challenge to the planning permission they've been adamant would fail?
Turkey was a desperate diversion that was never going to be truly transformational based on the nearby lookalike field rather than fields in Kurdistan.
Instead of nonsensical tweets maybe it's about time for UKOG to explain how it's going to survive this year, let alone until 2050.
And if you do believe that? Tell us how it will benefit ukog shareholders?
Ocelot? Do you actually believe that ?
... The Company is also in discussion with several significant potential international investors with regard to their participation in the Company's hydrogen storage project. (RNS of 01/02)
How are these discussions coming along?
The only power UKEn has is a stack of PowerPoint slides
Ocelot massive yawn.
Can you tell me how your udog shares are in percentage loss please?
You are keeping lying steve hanging on with his job with your positive believes.
Give it a rest please.
sando no more wages ….
UK Energy Storage Ltd: We will be powering Britain's future #energy #renewables #energystorage
Brilliant. Could you imagine Peter Jones ripping SS another a. Hole for having an unfounded, unworkable plan, inability to scale up and having invested sod all of his own money
APPLICATION NUMBER: WSCC/047/23
APPLICATION TYPE – COUNTY MATTER MINERALS
TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990
TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING (DEVELOPMENT MANAGEMENT PROCEDURE) (ENGLAND) ORDER 2015
To:
Mr Nigel Moore
The Innovation Centre,
Vienna Court
Kirkleatham Business Park
Redcar and Cleveland
TS10 5SH
In pursuance of their powers under the above-mentioned Act and Orders, West Sussex County Council hereby notify you that they REFUSE the following development, that is to say:
Temporary installation of a security fence, gates, and cabins (Variation of condition 1 of planning permission WSCC/001/22 to enable the retention of security fencing, gates & cabins for a further 24 months) at Wood barn Farm, Adversane Lane, Broadford Bridge, Billingshurst, West Sussex
as shown on the application and plans submitted to this Council, for the following reasons:
Reason for Refusal
1.
• There is no demonstrable need to retain the security fencing, gates, and cabins to carry out the appraisal of hydrocarbons at other sites.
• A significant period of time has elapsed since active exploration and appraisal on the site, and there is no demonstrable need for a further extension of time to restore the site. As a result, restoration would not take place at the earliest opportunity.
• Retention of the site in its current dormant state would not enable the extraction of minerals and, therefore, it has not been demonstrated that the development is essential to its countryside location.
Therefore, the proposal is contrary to Policies M23 and M24 of the West Sussex Joint Minerals Local Plan (July 2018- Partial Review), paragraph 217 of the National Planning Policy Framework (December 2023), and Policy 26 of the Horsham District Planning Framework (2015).
APPLICATION NUMBER: WSCC/046/23
APPLICATION TYPE – COUNTY MATTER MINERALS
TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990
TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING (DEVELOPMENT MANAGEMENT PROCEDURE) (ENGLAND) ORDER 2015
To:
Mr Nigel Moore
The Innovation Centre,
Vienna Court
Kirkleatham Business Park
Redcar and Cleveland
TS10 5SH
In pursuance of their powers under the above-mentioned Act and Orders, West Sussex County Council hereby notify you that they REFUSE the following development, that is to say:
The siting and development of a temporary borehole, well site compound and access road including all ancillary infrastructure and equipment (variation of condition 1 of planning permission WSCC/002/22 extending the permission by 24 months to enable the completion of phase 4 site retention and restoration) at Wood barn Farm, Adversane Lane, Broadford Bridge, Billingshurst, West Sussex
as shown on the application and plans submitted to this Council, for the following reasons:
Reason for Refusal
1.
• There is no demonstrable need to retain the site to carry out the appraisal of hydrocarbons at other sites.
• A significant period of time has elapsed since active exploration and appraisal on the site, and there is no demonstrable need for a further extension of time to restore the site. As a result, restoration would not take place at the earliest opportunity.
• Retention of the site in its current dormant state would not enable the extraction of minerals and, therefore, it has not been demonstrated that the development is essential to its countryside location.
Therefore, the proposal is contrary to Policies M23 and M24 of the West Sussex Joint Minerals Local Plan (July 2018- Partial Review), paragraph 217 of the National Planning Policy Framework (December 2023), and Policy 26 of the Horsham District Planning Framework (2015).
UKOG are going to struggle to obtain financing and suspension looms !!!
Lmfao “Dragons Den”
🤣
Dragons' Den?
Where are UKOG going to get future funding?
Any placing will probably be done by at least a 20% discount.
Best to look past the end of your nose imo.
RiverFort's website is rather embarrassing.
https://www.riverfort.com/post/_ukog
Think things are a bit more urgent than that, DARLYN.
Salmon slacks destroys share holder value. The share price reflects his leadership qualities. It will be a continuous slide back down to pre consolidation levels within 12 months. Then he will just repeat. Need to get rid of him but sadly he will continue to draw down his generous salary until he retires when he will turn the lights off as he walks away and flies to his holiday apartment in the sun.