Phil7390:- I know why Brocal starts a new thread. He's probably fed up with reading all the crap posted on here. You can tell the schools have broken up, as all the kids are all on here spouting inane rubbish. !!!!
Does anyone know if this cancellation was agreed with UKOG because of a requirement for further and better information. If SCC are prevaricating then UKOG could go straight to Appeal - Unlikely, as UKOG would want this agreed at a local level. I can only assume they are going to provide further information as part of the process but SCC should be adhering to the time frame for applications. - Very Strange !!
If we as a company are selling the oil extracted during the testing period, certain questions need to be asked of UKOG :- 1) what is this £3.5Million required for. 2) Are they about to buy out a partner. 3) Are they about to buy up another small explorer 4) Do UKOG know something we don't in terms of problems arising with the current testing
UKOG now need to stand up and explain their thinking, instead of putting out a standard statement saying its for future and existing needs. How can they expect investors to part with cash if they don't know what that cash is going to be used for. I and a great many others on here would like a more definitive statement.