Member Info for xviolet

Nice chart. thanks.

I love the bleating little posts about micro movements in the share price.

one day a real wave is going to come and sweep this all far far away (either up or down).

'getting cash from somewhere'

hmmm

no comment

Mr R

yes 'except.' so I am adding to my IMM position.

I have a few on my buy list - despite the war/recession/crash etc - this one. and a few CAD listed mining juniors.

it seems like a reasonable strategy - make a few cautious buys here and there. but expect further buying opps.

Been low everywhere.

lot of downtrends or treading water.

its the war innit - everyone expecting a market crash so everyone holding onto £. so even retail faves that should have seen a post new ISA boost....no boost. but the £ is out there. waiting.

i've been adding - but not 2 everything. this is such a difficult market. but i've been adding to a select few...nothing on AIM...expect this one.

I think it is improbable that the Medical College of Wisconsin would be involved in a predatory move to seize value from IBAI's IP. I have never attended or scrutinized this Medical College but I still think that is a very unlikely scenario.

There is a point where if you invest in a company you have to trust the company. And I think you also need to know the field - you would need to know pharma, company law etc. I don't know that stuff so I have tailored my investment and my opinions according to my level of knowledge.

Hi Tyke

Yes I received a very polite and interesting email from Michael. Which I am still studying. However Michael confirmed - as you probably know - that Imaging Biometrics has commercial rights to the Phase 1 trail results (of GaM in adult GBM'. eived.

He also confirmed that the data from the trial sponsored by the Medical College of Wisconsin will be owned by MCW.

Michael outlined the journey from Phase 1 clincial data to commercial returns. And I think most of us have a reasonable picture of that journey. And as we know that is not happening at the moment. IBAI is not going to fund its own Phase 2 trial.

Perhaps an interesting point is that while IBAI is not going to pursue its own Phase 2 - at present - that does not mean that additonal academic studies can reference the existing Phase 1. So perhaps the MCW study is 'referencing' the IBAI study rather than being a move to steal or take value from IBAI.

My own take...that value may be very challenging to realize.

we're gonna be here for a long time. which is good as I still have more research to do on this company.

Https://www.financemagnates.com/trending/why-silver-is-going-up-and-why-bank-of-america-predicts-309-price-in-2026/

it does seem ludicrous. but its out there.

re iron and bruce - yeah he does seem very direct.

Well...

ask is more up

wonder if its ticking...like a lit fuse...

or if it means nowt. we shall see.

Set a bit higher than the current sp?

so....in time we should be there. it does look like there's quite a lot of £ to be moved on those CLNs back to TrueTide. so presumably something must happen here - something to create value and create interest - to make that so?

Is that free shares for Nick and Brian?

if so..vomit.

I watched the last one. in the last one it defo looked like Bruce wanted to sell the iron project.

Be best to use the money to pay for more drilling on the silver project? Or whatever it needs.

Defo an irritating stock to hold - but I think that might just be because a lot of us small investors are very flaky. And the war etc doesn't help. Year of the flake and speculative mining stocks....well they are what they are. We need to see dips being bought - that will be telling. We also really need to see silver and gold break away from the rest of the market. Give it time.

I'll have a think. I've been in here for years so they can exercise the lot for all I care.

but for this morning i'm calling them pre-war warrants. by this afternoon I'll have some better thoughts.

There was a July placing/warrants as well.

How many 0.3 warrants left?

120 mill?

Downstep justufied?

no idea. you'd have to know a lot about mining to be able to answer that question. on the whole small investors in mining shares don't know much about mining. we're not geos. we're not financiers. we don't make sit visits. we are fairly clueless. so read into the sp what you like. if its on its way to becoming a mine that's good. if not, then not so good.

Tyke

I'll ask them. Perhaps someone else could as well...send an email. We may or may not get a response. But it doesn't hurt to ask.

I read through the various RNS's re data and trials. And went back over the RPDD and Orphan Drug designation RNS's. But...are some people concerned that with MCW sponsoring the trial that MCW have a financial stake in the results of the trial? And to be honest I don't know what the kind of commercial or contractual arrangement IBAI have with MCW.

But how do you factor in this trial - below - which is another gallium trial sponsored by MCW....

Oral Gallium Maltolate for the Treatment of Relapsed and Refractory Glioblastoma

ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT04319276

Sponsor Medical College of Wisconsin

Information provided by Jennifer Connelly, MD, Medical College of Wisconsin (Responsible Party)

Last Update Posted 2025-11-03

that makes 2 trials sponsored by MCW - including this older one? for me its all 2 confusing to lose any sleep over. perhaps because I always guessed (it was only a guess) that the gallium project's value was in the benefit to patients and then improved kudos and status as it would raise the profile of the company and its team. But writing as someone who doesn't work in pharma or the pharma/finance sector I can honestly share no certainty about any of this - and I am ok with that. This is not my field so I don't feel that I can easily understand the moves and their meaning. When I do have a question or a concern I will email the company.

Came out yesterday

data re silver deficit. make of it what you will

no doubt plenty readers of that report active here.

Am I right in thinking there are three trials on the Clinical.Gov website. 2 with MCW as sponsor. 1 with IBAI. One of the MCW's trials dates back a couple of years. And yes I don't know what we can draw from all of this - I guess you would have to be up to date on the how MCW and IBAI work things out between them - or what kind of relationship exists.

Hi Tyke

'nothing'? nothing at all.

like nothing/zero from any and every perspective...

just because it doesn't say 'sponsor' on the clinicals.gov site. granted I don't know the ins and outs of this industry but 'nothing' seems a bit strong. has anyone asked the company btw?