Member Info for WordSpaghetti

Unless, of course, Lunn was browsing LSE in the middle of a PPP GM which explains why nothing is done unless it suits him if he has that sort of time to waste into the ether.

Interesting that my factual post got deleted so quickly.

It is a fact from 2023 accounts that the 3 directors (Evans, Rapp, Lenigas) were paid a total of $120,000 or so for the year. This equates to approximately $40,000 per person.

It is also a fact that Evans and Rapp lent most of their shares to PPP in order to fund a loan which meant keeping the company afloat and eliminating dilution for investors at that point.

Whatever cretin is doing this I am taking screenshots of all my posts and sending them to LSE and the FCA so they can investigate who is trying to manipulate this board. I am sure it should be linked to the same FCA investigation into Lunn (As I recall Lunn saying I was live streaming the GM when I obviously wasn't as I wasn't even there - so someone on here DOES have a direct link to Lunn and that link shall be found out, and prosecutions will follow).

I don't think lending the company your shares to continue funding and avoiding dilution for everyone is corrupt. Nor is paying yourselves $40,000 a year in salary ($120,000 for 3 as of 2023 accounts).

If other directors also I reckon he would have published them and then hidden behind "we was all doing it g'vnor, none of us quite understood but we do now".

Getting Lunn out - he is currently sitting on the accounts and refusing to publish them. I reckon Auditors found something incriminating to Lunn. Otherwise by now he could hand them out, doesn't have to be readmitted to trading by 1st Aug and stay in suspensions (As we don't know what the state of the 2025 accounts are).

Yet he continues to NOT make the 2024 accounts public.

And another problem with all of your statements is somehow the fact there are projects in motion but not actually completed means you think this share should be entirely worthless which is not true. Whilst Main market shares are less sentiment based, there is of course some parts here where you either trust the management or you don't. You highlight it is commendable that AB is putting her own money into this, yet them seem to trivialise it with 'keeping the lights on'. She is doing what she must to try to make this company a success - which you know full well as I know you are in the HUI Telegram group and you certainly read her most recent statements just last week. Yet here you are on a public forum conveniently forgetting everything that is said and spinning it your way.

Incidentally you've not posted there is a while so i reckon you have no shares - and if you posted there like you do here you'd have been booted a while ago. To be honest if I posted in here and especially like i do here on occasion so would I. And this is why this forum is an absolute crock of sh* te because the admins are toothless, and don't bother to enforce false and misleading information. Of which most of your posts are.

Your problem Penstock is all your snide comments at the end of each point which is pushing your spin on what seems to be an innocent statement. "Printed on recycled paper". Just honestly give it a rest. You're obviously a trader, you don't support HUI, so why are you here.

In that case Bezos is worth about £5m as his shares are apparently worthless to the tax authorities. However this is not the case for inheritance tax or similar wealth tax which exists in Spain (impuesto de patrimonio).

I also maintain that the placee has only sold 9-10mln of those placing shares and holds the other 4-5mln of them. So it is a very good way to get a significant amount of shares in HUI. I'm aiming for 1% of the issued share capital in the short term if I can stretch that far.

And you have no idea when the 1.7p placing rate was arrived at. As I have mentioned previously it could have been at a premium to the closing price when we were below 1.2p, or it could have been a discounted price from the night before which was 2.3p not 3.3p as you are insinuating.

False and misleading information. again.

No, you are insinuating stuff you have no idea about. It's called spreading FUD.

I also wonder how it is possible for Anton's estate to only be worth £100k. The shares FHF, or Anzcorp, or PQ owns in PPP are worth more than that.

I wonder how the Spanish authorities are aware of Lunn's tax status of his whole world assets (by law he needs to declare all this).

Penstock - what is it with you and spurious theories? I don't post any positive "theories" so why are you posting negative "theories". We have been told the £250k was specifically for the MENA project. Until I hear otherwise that is the truth of the matter as stated in the 11th June minor placing RNS.

Honestly, you really need to get with the program and stop posting false and potentially misleading information.

Must be a small-minded person if being picked up on a typo lets you go off on one and rant. filturd.

Jgbb - yeah, you 'loose' your investment. I don't think you have one here.

No not female, but good to know you are an idiot and sexist.

Aaaaand we're live.

Poor penstock the trader. It is what it is. Feel the love - ETTO does.

And sorry UK inheritance tax - I assume his properties are owned through companies as well in both countries.

I'd go after the estate of the company secretary. No way his estate was valued at just £100,000 being a multimillionaire on paper plus all of the other shareholdings in New Zealand - unless he was paying the £30,000 non Dom get out fee. if he wasn't then all earnings globally are liable to have tax paid here - that is now Lunn's problem.