Member Info for Wolster

Agreed CEO needs his feet in the game.

I wasn't asked, but I think its high time this company was sold, so we can all get our lives back & this bb can move into legend.

Yep, but the costs to extract are higher (perma frost, transport, lack of infrastructure etc..) & the season is shorter (hence a longer extraction time, not just a greater resource) all im saying is more upfront costs before extraction can commence.

We are far more attractive & more immediate to market.

Therefore they would buy us 1st, worry about arctic 2nd.

All points suggest the need for more ground no matter where.

I saw a post earlier alluding to NN not needing more ground as well, which is total garbage as no way would they consider trekking up into the Arctic Circle on a JV if they weren't ground short.

EUA fits far more snuggly into their operations & is de-risked (via synergies) as a result.

There's always a coffee cream as well - gl folks.

"UFO is the best silver junior miner on AIM" - Its not got much to benchmark that calim against, its not producing anything, we have yet to test its aquisitions properly, the silver bull run hasn't kicked off yet, how big is the silver play vs other metals all.

No rush, plenty of time to invest we have no idea how far this will retrace the 3p zenith, which was totally a pumped up price, propped up by traders (me included) & new shares in the market getting disposed.

Plenty arrived on the dirt cheap entry last month have made their money & left, it'll take something new from the BOD to cause the next surge (dilution RNS's wont be it thats for sure)

Like I say I like the silver play angle - but its unproven & no longer the easy one wy punt it was last month.

Not seeing many worth reading.

The this is a bargin, this will be over 2p np, its to cheap.

Its all paff, get some facts in this BB, if you want investers - less pump.

It might help , if this company could generate as many RNS's about resource upgrades/drilling activity etc..as it does about dilutions of greater or lesser amounts......

Silly boy "Funds4Failure" I noticed has morphed from an anti Wolster poster (who frankly couldn't compete with my level of whit & charm) into a sad & rather pathetic supporter of any share negativity thats going around.

Most here do not Ramp, we just invest at lows & wait for our investments play out.

Your strategy appears to select up & coming stocks & moan about them until the BB gets bored to death (its an odd take I grant you & hardly a solid strategy for a nice life - I suggest doing RESEARCH before you invest & tone down your negative tripe once in a while you old fart)

So did the suspension in fairness.

Outcome was good tho & defo inline with shareholders values....so patience will no doubt be tested.

"Anglo/French company"

Its a horrid mixture really, surprising they can even communicate amongst themselves tbh :)

Well I did neway. 27.15p good enough for me.

Off we go

Not to mention, creating a new account for each investment - seems less than nooby & more like Purchse new account (so he can talk to himself) & stroke mooorreee.

Just do one, one post & take your negative sshhshhhhiiiiittteee with you.

OMG - 919p - 985p .last time I type about top ups (most pointless 3 posts of my life)

Yep not used to dealing in £ shares :) 1919p - 1985p

Got 6 top ups to lower my average (took a few goes - on HL) lowest 19.19 - highest 19.85, so topping up was certainly possible if not easy - may need to break your amount down lower in future.

Noticeing the massive drop on open (coupled with no news) forced my hand this morning.

I really like how much effort has been placed by the MM's on forceing this swing (& sustaining it for most of the morning), they really do want these shares by the look of it.

Is the violence of this morning typical - or an extreme example of the typical ie...are they doing this in excess of normal parameters (again this might indicate a leak/desparate move/benificial short close)

Sadly I have no idea why tho - all assistance in this regard would be welcome.

Its less the give away %, its more the cash generation I have issue with.

(I find the + they will pay for building the mine costs argument immaterial, ofc thye will pay for the mine costs - they own the flippin mine :)

At some point us shareholders will be funding another raise - & the less cash they generate on these deals the more dilution hits us.