Member Info for Winstanley

Whatever that previous message was - it didn't register a viewing.

https://shorturl.at/pb7TU

Transformative Acquisitions:

The mention of 'transformative M&A' indicates that Banijay is seeking significant acquisitions that could fundamentally change its business landscape. This could involve acquiring companies that provide new technologies, content, or market access, which would enhance Banijay's competitive edge and diversify its offerings.

https://worldscreen.com/banijay-unveils-expansion-plans/

New FDA framework on changes coronavirus vaccine approval will be released “in the coming days,” :

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/fda-vaccine-approval-rfk-jr-b2751949.html

Dulwichman,

I appreciate that you have your own views, and it's valuable to consider each other's perspectives. Your subjective opinions and critiques highlight important issues regarding the necessity for a more active trade strategy in the UK, particularly after Brexit. Our politicians might not be so much lazy - but rather having their hands tied behind their backs. My argument is that if Brexit was meant to grant us the freedom to trade globally, as promised by the people who peddalled it, then it contradicts that goal if we seem to be subordinate to the U.S. and their demands on our trading partners. I believe we were equal members in the EU, which was good.

Under the influence of Trump, which is how it's panning out, it is far from what Brexit supporters described as 'taking our country back.' Imagine if we don't do as we're told - Trump would probably revert to dictator mode again and want to buy the UK, like he's suggested with Canada and others. I don't admire his protectionism, it's globally damaging.

Yes, it's frustrating - but we have to wait. The current lack of interest from the City in ITV's latest takeover bid may suggest skepticism due to past unsuccessful attempts, leading to a "cry wolf" effect. However, the modest rise in share price could indicate that some investors sense potential value or that something is brewing behind the scenes. Even without a bid, ITVX advertising is notching up nicely and ITV have major sporting event coverage coming soon. I remain bullish, with or without a takeover.

It's all out in the open. Overall, the situation suggests that a bid for ITV could be forthcoming, as Banijay is actively exploring options for expansion and has expressed a clear interest in ITV.

How much damage needs to be done before the backpedaling starts?

https://youtu.be/-Y9V7r0uf_I?si=Q0CipSAdsVSMzKV1

Https://pharmaphorum.com/news/rfk-jr-defends-hhs-cuts-measles-stance-congress-hearings

Inept Trump continues to cause chaos. Although it's good to know that ITV are:

'In line with guidance ...while assessing the impact of tariffs, it did not expect its television-making unit to be hit by U.S. President Donald Trump's proposed film levies.'

We weren't anticipating much today, were we? Takeover hints were never likely, but there’s room for things to evolve now. ITV Studios experienced a 1% rise in revenue, with a remarkable 15% increase in digital advertising revenue for ITVX, which looks very promising.

To recap on my last post, just incase anyone misunderstood: My earlier comments were tongue in cheek, regarding Trump's core support, and to be fair I'm biased in some respects. My intention was not to suggest that all Americans lack intelligence. Rather, I was specifically referring to a segment of his supporters who seem to prioritise loyalty to him over the complexities of international relations. While Trump's actions, IMO, have indeed caused significant damage to world relations I believe that many Americans would be more receptive to a different leader who approaches these issues with a more diplomatic mindset. It's important to recognise that my 'looking down upon' was aimed at a specific group and not a reflection of the intelligence of the entire American populace. No offence meant.

Trump has done huge damage to world relations. You could put it down to playing for his domestic audience, most of which are of the lowest intelligence, or to typical American brashness. However, most would be welcoming if it were someone else and not him.

Interestingly, the U.S. tried to stop Britain developing the nuclear bomb after WW11.

In the grand scheme of things, if you go back far enough, Britain has a lot of skeletons in it's cupboard. Gunboat diplomacy, with Britain's powerful navy, was the way trade was done. China and India were treated poorly by the British. China certainly could have done without their land being flooded with Opium!

Ok, it was a long time ago and we've moved on. But, if the U.S. are stipulating how we engage with China, then we haven't moved on enough.

The whole point of leaving the EU was that we'd be free to trade with the rest of the world.

Personally, I preferred being in a union.

https://www.britannica.com/topic/opium-trade

Yes, they did, but the ulterior motive was not so much about stopping the Nazis, or helping us - it was the fear of a United Europe (in that instance under a dictatorship).

More recently, IMO, sections of the U.S pushed for Brexit as did Putin.

Trump is now acting like a wannabe dictator. China exists, we can't change it but we can trade and be defensively strong with or without the U.S. What kind of a President would ever consider backing out of NATO - it beggars belief!!

IMO, leaving the EU simply translates to subservience to the U.S. What a mess.

China hits out at UK-US trade deal:

https://www.lbc.co.uk/world-news/china-uk-us-trade-deal-blow-government-bid-revive-relations/

Https://www.asdnews.com/news/defense/2025/05/12/formidable-shield-begins-at-qinetiqoperated-mod-hebrides

Pension funds to boost investment in businesses and infrastructure projects,,:

https://www.thisismoney.co.uk/money/markets/article-14704491/Britains-biggest-pension-funds-vow-boost-investment-businesses-infrastructure-projects.html

Trump, whatever he claims, has rowed back on his China tariffs - in a nutshell he's failed. The damage done in the process was unnecessary.

The question is, where will his pharma fiasco end?

'There is a possibility that negotiated deals with individual firms, such as AstraZeneca and GSK, eventually will be rolled into wider trade agreements.'

https://www.thisismoney.co.uk/money/comment/article-14704465/AstraZeneca-GSK-firing-line-Trump-targets-big-pharma-ALEX-BRUMMER.html

Just finished on BBC Radio4, PM with Evan Davies chatting to an expert on Trump's proposed pharmaceutical changes. Today's episode should be available soon (not at the moment ) on BBC Sounds, it's worth a listen.

Https://www.proactiveinvestors.co.uk/companies/news/1071039/hvivo-offers-a-compelling-opportunity-broker-says-1071039.html