Member Info for winnings1

Based on fundamentals, APH shares ought to be trading in region of 100p, not in region of current low price of 70p-75p. IMHO.

At some point in time Woodford will have to sell out the entire portfolio of shares in his locked Fund to another Fund Manager Company. Then there will be no anxiety to cash in by the investors, and all the good shares in the portfolio will rise & recover very fast from the 'Woodford Effect'', which in the case of e.g. ESL has damaged the share price to the tune of 25% or more down from where they should be.

Performance looks gpod, but the end-figure for total borrowings is up. Anyone with a simple explanation?

Just market makers playing safe until they see/feel the trend to be. Remember, stock bought by a market maker needs to find a client/buyer at no loss to the market maker.

Does anyone know the FY20 financial forecast/s. The Company announced (today's RNS) to be trading in line with FY fincancail forecast/s.

The fall in the share price must be attributed to Corbyn's plan to Nationalize the electricity industry.
Labour's chances of winning an election are increasing. INSE's services may be severely curtailed
should Nationalizing of the electricity industry take place.

If any stock is undervalued it has to be INSE. Once that off-loading institution is finished and buyers return then we shall see the share price rise sharply to well above 20p, IMHO.

I am amazed at people selling this share at 16p. Why, why, oh why? I do not think there is much better value in the Market than INSE shares at 16p. Or have I missed something?

RNS sounds robustly positive. If IQE cannot turn this progress into strong profits then somebody else will, i.e. watch out for a takeover bid.

Trading Update (see today's RNS) sound jolly good to me. Lower coal prices, upped electricity prices, what more can we look for! I expect very handsome Earning Per Share for the year.

See Ttading Update today, the Company is making great progress and, in my view, could grow into a very large outfit over the years to come. I topped up.

My view on the situation (rightly or wrongly : HOPELESS!.

AMSt around 330p possibly at fair value just now, whilst APH (another favourite of mine) has in my view more mileage ahead. But as always, no certainties in this game.

Target price of 115 is not out of the ordinary, but could take a year or more to get there though. My target price for the short term is 90p, although I won't be selling at that.

Shire price has risen quite a bit in recent days, indeed perhaps becoming a little frothy at 335p?

I can not find a more undervalued Company in the market than INSE. The shares trade on a PE-ratio of
less than 10, yet the Company's performance/progress warrants a PE-ratio of 15 or more, IMHO..

I presume Lithium Batteries are more suited to fast uptake and fast release of electricity, Vanadium Flow Units too slow for the job.

Quality, quality and quality - these are the three words I would use if asked to describe AMS in brief words.

Ninety percent of the project is to consist of Lithium storage with only 10 percent Vanadium flow.
Yet, time and time again, we have been assured by Redt's management that the Vanadium flow machines are superior to Lithium battery storage. So the consortium have opted for inferior over superior?

Why such a small part for the vanadium flow machines in the project, why the preference for the lithium based storage?