Member Info for WillIwontI

16 posts recorded today but only 4 visible?

Phimx is getting bit touchy isn't he! Bless, nobody's listening to his little tantrum.

Https://x.com/QBTOfficial256/status/2033620561633370340?s=20

Hexham, by that argument why keep investing millions in new more efficient asic chips then?

Deramper is given a bar of gold and can only complain how heavy it is.

Ramoer is given same bar of gold and can only think it means they're going to get more.

Person with no agenda is given a var of gold and says thank you very much, I will enjoy it and use it wisely.

Wow, don't think it's me that's drinking the bitter lemon sunshine! Have a nice day but please don't join any help groups!

Hi, sorry this has a bit of a negative slant to it but it is a genuine question I have whilst considering re-investing here.

Is anyone concerned Andy is having to use his own money as a kick-start and will institutional investors be wary of what happened last time Sunda were in this position. In other words, what's the chances of Andy securing the funds necessary to move this on?

Thanks for the explanation Mikeydy, some good posts at last, appreciated.

Thanks for the explanation Mikeydy, some good posts at last, appreciated.

Could someone explain the alleged Cannacord connection please?

Thank you

Phimx, the little boy who cries QBT over and over and over again because he has no friends and no one will listen to him. His story is available in the LSE back catalogue, still unread and ignored (so boring!!)

Phimx, I know what I said, I wrote it! but keep up your constant inane opposition it obviously helps you somehow, can't think of any other reason you live on thus board.

I don't believe this is a dead duck but I do believe the R&D has been very badly managed and communicated by a naive FG who obviously didn't grasp the loop holes the process of R&D to Commercialisation needs to jump through. If he had understood they would have been planned for and accommodated within the initial planning stages and not come as a surprise requiring frequent changes of direction and backward steps. Otherwise all is good if although severely delayed, confused and generating a lack of market confidence. Basically the technology could still be ground breaking but Commercialisation is beyond FG.

Just read Proactive's summary of the latest RNS and interview, in all honesty if FG could communicate professionally and in a similar manner to this I honestly think QBT would be held in more respect and perhaps the sp wouldn't suffer every time he releases news.

Whilst SS may ve a charleton and a fraud lie so many AIM CEOs, what concerns me more are the stock exchange managers and facilitators who facilitate such behaviour to their own again.

No one is there to protect the PI. Whilst profit is obviously the aim of the game absolute personal greed seems to come before any form of moral conduct in all areas of stocks and shares.

I may have misread/misheard the latest commentary but why are QBT only talking to companies with older generation miners rather than to companies with Bitmain's newest miner as well?

We're led to believe this oracle enhances any miners operation system so why limit who they are talking too?

I've said it before and I'll say it again.

QBT need an commercial entry point that miners and manufacturers are happy to take a punt on and I personally believe this has been the stumbling block.

QBT have expected companies to fawn all over their products and pay handsomely to use them while those companies are also expected to take substantial financial risks.

QBT now hopefully have a low risk product that companies might think worth taking a punt on but maybe QBT need to consider providing it foc initially to build interest and confidence in the market. Payment could be agreed after that initial foc period for those taking the first couple of orders

I've said it before and I'll say it again.

QBT need an commercial entry point that miners and manufacturers are happy to take a punt on and I personally believe this has been the stumbling block.

QBT have expected companies to fawn all over their products and pay handsomely to use them while those companies y

Anyone know what this might infer, just updated on Companies House:

Cessation of City of London Trustees Limited as a person with significant control on 6 November 2025

From QBTs own website:

Principle 2 Understanding Shareholder Needs and Expectations

Seek to understand and meet shareholder needs and expectations

The Company endeavours to maintain a dialogue and keep both private and institutional shareholders informed through its public announcements and its corporate website.

In addition, shareholder communication may also be answered, where possible or appropriate, by the Company’s Financial PR advisor, Leander PR or the Company’s Nominated Advisor and Broker, SP Angel Corporate Finance LLP.

As true and correct as Labours manifesto.

It's all very well requiring these statements as part of the charter but if they are not governed and enforced by the relevant regulator then both the company and the regulator are questionable.