Member Info for WillIwontI

Don't you just love all theses keyboard 'experts' who know so much more than those who actually work in the field of expertise they talk about 😂

One estimate of Phimx trolling energy consumption is 176 TW. Phimx claims he can save investors millions of pounds due to his trolling advice. This is an incredible saving, worth many millions.

The interest from true investors ... 𝗭𝗘𝗥𝗢

Is there anything else to know ?

Is riceboy the son or grandson of Private Frazer? Seems to be a strong resemblance.

I would hope some update but not sure it would be worthy of a PRN so soon afterwards, that might take a few weeks of further talks to get to that stage.

We know Fleccy, trust me we know!

We do all know PG is there with Jose doing one yo ones don't we? Surely no one is doubting that?

Phmx, just because PG hasn't told you what he's doing doesn't mean he's not doing it. You having delusions of grandeur doesn't mean you're entitled to be treated like a member of the board and be privy to everything. Unfortunately you are no better than any of the rest of us, except that we are actually investors and you're just a self obsessed nobody who offers absolutely nothing but wants everything.

My opinion for what it's worth.

PG would be better concentrating on the most likely method to get to market first and generate reputation, income and a reputation in the industry for QBT and then contine R&D of the other methods and potentially new ones.

It appears at the moment there's too much going on which is spreading resources too thinly and slowing down marketability (if that's a word?)

I remain invested but what comes accross as a scatter gun approach is denting my hopes for tangible results any time soon.

Fingers crossed we have something meaningful to bitcoin miners at the next conferences.

Right, thanks Ltd

Curious to know why it's marked as unknown when well below mid point at the time?

I actually agree with you viceroy and consider your post a useful argument. I might give PG 12months but he needs to start considering proper negotiation and compromise otherwise he's going to blow what is potentially a major development of blockchain. All my opinion of course but I get the impression he is demanding partnerships completely on his own terms instead of considering accommodating a measure of compromise to get major partners on board.

To be fair, this is something I've queried with CTW (rather than post it on a board just for effect) as I do think a listed company should at least demonstrate professionalism in all aspects of the business. Unfortunately PG considers himself master of all trades to the detriment (my opinion) of the company, something I've voiced before.

Saying that, I still believe they are onto something but need proper help and advice in getting it to market and in compromising on some of the demands they currently insist on in doing so.

User, be careful what you criticise CTW for, they have no involvement with the web site - glass houses, stones etc. Perhaps you're not as clever as you think?

Of course it needs to go through the manufacturing process and the design amended accordingly, what it doesn’t need is 2-3 years of development and £15m development costs, that's already done!

User, sticking your fingers in your ears and going la la la only works for 5 year olds, it's not hard to understand that you take an existing chips, alter the production to include an additional programme and continue manufacture, no one is altering the original programming, they are adding something extra. But you carry on going la la la.

User, nobody has to develop and manufacture a new ASIC! Method C is added to existing chips at manufacture stage of existing chips.

Of course you know this though but keep on with your rhetoric to damage the reputation of a company at all costs. Shameful.

FG for a CEO of a listed company does seem to lack the fundamental rule for reporting and communication for a company. What we get is disjointed and isolated snippets of information at any one time. Company reports always follow a thread, always referring to the last report on the matter and how it has developed into the current situation. Whilst we are not privy to the company reports communication to share holders needs to follow the same principal edited to suit.

To make brash unfounded statements only to be ignored in later releases that announce something supposedly exciting without reference to anything previously is incompetence at best and misleading and manipulative at worst.

It's time FG handed this part of the role to someone with that area of expertise before what could be a huge opportunity is killed off by poor communication, publicity and lost commercialisation opportunities.

I remain keeping my fingers crossed.

Usersteve said 'I'm too thick to google a website'.

User, you know fine well it's all on QBT's website.

Perhaps if some of the raised money was used to employ and pay for a PR company who understood communication, sentiment, communication threads and transparency etc. the SP might not suffer so much through the inept meandering we currently suffer. CTW may well be able to do this but I get the impression FG honestly believes he can do it and only uses them for PRNs etc. Even Professors have limitations.