Member Info for WillIwontI

Thanks Big, I assume you are suggesting UOG retain 25% ownership with zero cost, this clarifies what would be a more reasonable farm out percentage under the circumstances. 2p would be circa 8 fold increase which would be nice.

Bit of a pointless question I know but, if UOG for discussion purposes got a deal with a farm-in for 50% stake based on a 7 billion varrel prospect, what kind of effect do people think this would have on the SP?

I'm not too sure about that Mikeydj, if you zoom in carefully and photo shop it, that orange appears to be an apple painted orange, the stalk doesn't look right or to be in the right place, it's the wrong shape and you can just make out the words Granny Smith. I think it's actually two apples but be quick because PG follows my posts and will alter it again to hide the name!

Thanks for replying OSD, unfortunately I don't think it's possible to rewind the live webcam unless I'm missing something.

Hi OSD, is there anywhere I could see any footage of your boat and the parade? We have a strong affection for Kos and g enjoy hearing of your escapades there.

You getting a little desperate Phimx, there's desperation and then there's desperation and then there's you, t*t.

Thank you for trying to provide a balanced summary Usersteve. I'd be interested to see the the same from Mikeydj's perspective?

I don't need to try it Phimx, I use common sense and knowledge all the time, have done for a long long time, that's why I'm always wise to your silly games and immature attitudes to matters you don't personally agree with and can't understand why others might have the audacity not to bow to your twisted sense of supremity.

Phimx, are you for real!! You pretend to now so much yet don't know the relevance of a photo weeks old. Try photo shopping it into something you can slander the company about like usual.

*at you

Did you bother reading the RNS oldsharedog, I'm surprised you.

I totally agree with you on this point Hexham, it would be nice if the reasons were made clear but I doubt they will.

I do however understand that you are negatively biased in the the majority of your posts which can be tiresome.

A well communicated PRN, perhaps QBT are improving news releases too.

I see nothing but positives in this, of course they can't release details of the secret miner's results but they will advise on success or otherwise. Also good to hear they are continuing tests on their own S9 alongside the secret one so that they can share more detail on that. The only thing we need to know on the secret one is that it was successful and the manufacturer agrees it's significant enough to want to do a deal.

Think I've solved it!!

It's a cardboard box from the supermarket sprayed black and put over the miner, the lettering Phomx can miraculously see is VAX (cleaning solutions).

No need to thank me Phimx, you can chill now.

Good interview, also explains the image which everyone except Phimx understood anyway, now drop it Phimx and go back to joining the dots in you colouring book, try and do them in numerical order this time though, any 3 year old will be able to help you if you're still struggling!

Thank you for your post Allforprofir, negative but honest in my opinion and helpful.

In summary, are you suggesting the BOD could, if this is passed, delist the company just prior to big money coming in and take it all for themselves? Surely if they want to delist it has to go to the share holders for a vote which would no doubt be rejected?

Thank you Usersteve, appreciate your reply and the clarification.

I've noticed, as I sure most have, that this has turned into a private members board where a select few enter into private conversations often at the expense of other's points and observations which is a shame and limits diverse debate.

This is the part of the RNS that's probably confusing me:

In order to expedite the development, the ASIC manufacturer has provided QBT with an MDK (Mining Development Kit), where the control of the hashing board connected to a computer server takes place on the server itself, rather than the mining rig,

Sorry to resurrect this debate again but hopefully Phimx has been forceably removed.

I know nothing about such matters so honest responses to an honest question would be appreciated.

Is there any possibility the pictured 'box' could be a client server rather than the actual miner which might be positioned elsewhere. Does the RNS say something about the software oracle working on a server housing the control board rather than the rig itself or am I making that up?

Just a thought, probably way off the mark.