Member Info for WillIwontI

Helium (HNT) is a cryptocurrency that's part of the Helium Network, a decentralized wireless internet of things (IoT) network:

Good morning RKB

Another intriguing and slightly baffling coded message from RKB 007 🧐

I have hand copied your post in invisible ink before it self combusts and will investigate the clues when I am alone in the safe house.

Take care RKB 007, hopefully we are able to meet up at QBT head quarters and share a Martini once this terrible ordeal is concluded and us and our true fellow investors are celebrating victory over our villainous corrupt counterparts.

Have a good day wherever you are🤝

And thank you for your reply, it is appreciated. Apologies for waking the trolls, I will tiptoe across their bridge more carefully in future.

Whilst it still seems like being involved in some sort of espionage where Spy RKB won't reveal his sources I'm going to be magnanimous and trust you until your mission is complete or your mission is terminated.

Looking forward to the next episode and hope my judgement is sound.

GLA

Brew, unfortunately you do repeatedly suggest negatives in a way that can be interpreted as fact to new or ill informed investors and this feeds the impression you do so on purpose for your own agenda. The shame is that you are better than that, you have posted some good information that I have appreciated for one.

Sorry 0134, where does it say they need to raise? It says no such thing, it flags up they need to increase funds one option being to raise, it doesn't say they need to raise, you lot are so infantile.

Indeed, family and health are what matters. The shenanigans on here are pathetic and so trivial compared to our loved ones.

Come on Brew, you've just made that up too though:

"You have the dynamic completely wrong. QBT are chasing, not the other way around."

Let's keep it real please.

0134 - "If any major mining company agreed with you then they'd have already chucked some cash QBTs way."

As if any major company anywhere "chucks cash at other companies" 😄

They might invest in another company under agreement and with evidence their investment is good. Hold on, isn't that what this latest stage is all about 🤔🤦‍♂️

Thanks for the replies, a bit clearer now, the same company reincarnated 3 times.

Just repeating my question as it is a genuine question, if this is QBT's Brainspark how can it have any relevance today?

Is the Brainspatk PLC that was disolved in 2010 the QBT Brainspark?

Genuine question, (you can sit thus one out Mikeydy)

Is the Brainspatk PLC that was disolved in 2010 the QBT Brainspark?

Mikeydj, are Brainspark a listed company?

To be fair Zesty, as long as Mikeydj isn't antagonising him Brew, in my opinion, provides some valuable insight and arguments regarding QBT and what they are attempting, fair enough he has his doubts but there has to be two sides to a meaningful discussion or debate, we just need to keep it civil.

Well done Mikeydj, another post you didn't like removed by you, you wield such power.

Hope you get round to doing that Brew, I'd be interested in how it pans out for you if you're willing to share.

Loving this, I'm learning a lot and understand the various issues being dealt with now, thank you. Brew, you are obviously very knowledgeable about the intricacies involved and appreciate you sharing them in such a constructive way. And thank you to those who are savvy enough to challenge and offer alternative views equally as helpful.

It's a long time since a discussion like this was allowed to progress in this manner and I for one am grateful for the knowledge being gained.

Thank you, a good discussion here and good relevant points which ever side you might take, let's keep it going and on track please.

My approach to QBT, just for (sensible) debate.

My thoughts are FG isn't particularly interested in QBT the company or indeed the share price, they are merely a medium to enable him to test his theories on blockchain. I do believe however, that he is determined to prove his theories and develop them into disruptive products that will have significant impact in the blockchain arena. He is an academic, a professor and expert in his field but not necessarily an AIM businessman.

And whilst I like many find this frustrating and not right for investors, it is also why I am invested, he is focused on the end goal which will, if reached, make us all sizeable returns and FG himself lots of money but also a lot of satisfaction.

I'm sticking through thick and thin but would appreciate clearer communication in the mean time.

FG in his wisdom leaves more questions than answers with every news release or interview, the question is, is this incompetent report writing (unforgiveable for any company regardless of size) or is it by design, either reason should be taken to task by the regulators if the company consistently fails in this regard in my opinion.

Not taking sides here as I can't be bothered but is it possible FG will agree to open source if patents ever get approval?