Member Info for WeTookPelham

@8:10am, a buy?
Also noticed multiple after hours trades last night, which we've not seen for a little while.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-china-64111492

"Italy has become the latest country to impose mandatory Covid tests on Chinese tourists, after China announced it would reopen its borders next week.

Tighter measures have also been brought in by Japan, Malaysia, Taiwan and India - while the US said it is considering imposing more rules.

After almost three years of restrictions, China will let people travel more easily from 8 January.

At the same time, the country is facing a surge in Covid cases."

An interesting turn of events. What could happen/be happening regarding mutations in China now considering they've had essentially zero covid, and now have basically decided they will be easing restrictions, internally and cross border?

Is this what Italy and others are worried about?

"...However, what’s wrong with a little optimism in hoping for news this side of Christmas?".

Exactly, lots of bah humbug here IMO.

Just simply going by the headline, it seems Professor Durrant was justified with the route Scancell took instead!?

"Katalin Kariko was early proponent of messenger RNA research.
She helped develop Covid-19 vaccine while working at BioNTech"

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-12-17/vaccine-pioneer-sees-mrna-technology-s-limits-in-treating-cancer?srnd=premium-europe&leadSource=uverify%20wall

Behind paywall unfortunately but an interesting headline!

Exactly C7.

I would understand delays if they made the same statement in say Feb 2022 and there was long term estimating/drifting going on, but you wouldn't normally set a short term target date (i.e. weeks to go) without being fairly sure. IMO.

Not sure if this was ever posted here?

"Read our latest, interesting paper on "Citrullinated glucose-regulated protein 78 is a candidate target for melanoma immunotherapy". Link below!
#Immunotherapy #melanoma #Cancer

https://www.scancell.co.uk/Data/Sites/1/media/publications/papers/brentville-et-al-2022.pdf "

That happened yesterday too didn't it?

"Scancells techs ahem better?"
This.
To a total science layman like myself, Scancell's tech/products do come across as being superior to the competitions.
So what price Scancell/pipeline?

... particularly modi results on 3x cohort, you would have to be very impatient to sell now. IMO.

Anyone investing with money they need for day to day expenses shouldn't be investing. IMO.

Saw that, pretty substantial deal. Shows big pharma have big money to spend for the right companies/products.

Edit Ripley not flakey*

Interesting that there hasn't been updates recently, I think the Twitter debacle may have affected posters?

Excellent post EmptyEnd. I believe when a share see's a strong and fairly rapid rise like Scancell has of late, shorting the share (any share that hits the criteria) becomes very prevalent. A coincidence we see posters Iike flakey appear?

What was that about? Anomaly with the preceding and post price?

I would not trust any of the de-rampers on here either. Not one bit.
Especially if they have just started recently posting on a share they've never posted on before, and after said share has done very well of late.
They almost come across as someone shorting the share?

@ripley, RE your last post, now we know you're just a troll :)

"WTP they had nil effect here though... too many LTHs here that know enough not to be.... fooled!:) and keep the BB balanced."

Yes fair point crumbs, us LTHs obviously know better, newbies perhaps less so. But it is irritating still however, for me anyway.

But it's clear it's a strategy used across all companies (particularly AIM) on the various forums/socal media outlets. Reeks of a concerted effort...i.e paid de-rampers etc. Sherriff/Scumbag of AIM anyone?

But yes any new poster that appears now being negative from the get go should be treated with the appropriate suspicion, IMO.

Sorry, slighyly off topic, as some excellent science posts this weekend. But want to relay this post by Laura2022 who also posts in here, but taken from another thread:

"I find it odd that people like Metcom whom I have never seen post on this board this year suddenly turn up and post negatives, the same happened on SCLP, LLOYD a others

I just don't understand the motivations of some people"

As Laura says, after our recent rise we've had our share of random posters who've never or rarely posted show up to throw a in negative slant/de-ramp.

But I think we all know their reasons why. Their game is too obvious to see. However I don't think it will work anymore.
So toodlepip negative nancies.