Member Info for WeTookPelham

P.s. I spoke too soon regarding this! Seems Trish hasn't been told by Scancell she can't post.

https://community.macmillan.org.uk/cancer_types/head-neck-cancer-forum/f/updates/248889/immunotherapy---cancer-vaccine-trial#pifragment-13906=3

"Question is... has our patient on the Macmillian forum now been told / asked by Scancell not to share any result on the forum prior to any official RNS by Scancell . I would love to read a about a wonderful result posted on the 30th or shortly afterwards ... but I will not be concerned or take it as a negative if nothing is posted. Of course, there are ways of conveying a message without being direct : ))"

An excellent point ViolinDog.

As it's the World Cup, to use a football analogy, a suitable chant to team doom would be...
..."you're not singing anymore".
IMO.

Yeah...talk of 5/6p by certain posters has certainly quietened down hasn't it? Funny that?

...With everything we are learning now i.e. AGM notes and in particular Trish...Hence a cheeky top up...I'm even averaging up!
*not financial advice!

... IMO

Taken from burbles post on Monday 19:21, based on listening to botskis recording I think.

"SCIB1 - 10 patients on vax alone still alive 7 or so years later. 4 patients received SCIB1+CPI - still doing well. Some sadly have passed away despite everything.
iSCIB1 - already manufactured, MHRA need to sign off on amendment. In pre-clinical now curing 50% - so more potent than SCIB1."

Still alive after seven years! Whilst not necessarily new info perhaps (?) I feel like I and others haven't made as big a deal about this as we should have?

And iScib1 even more potent!?

Essential housekeeping for moves afoot?

IMO both your and Wildforce's posts just reiterates how under the radar Scancell still are.

So no dip to 14p!? I was saving all my coffers for that!

Sorry Chester, is that confirmation of what was said yesterday or is this newer site news?

P.s. still surprised they named BionTech specifically, I'm sure they have never done that before, either at an AGM or proactive event?
Is it more than just a firm interest?

@wigwammer, great summary of the BionTech situation. I was trying to say something similar last night but your explanation is much better!

P.s. Weren't there a few posters who scorned at the suggestion that BionTech would be interested in Scancell products because of the differing technologies (mRNA/DNA)?

So we definitive confirmation about Trish and the macmillan forum. And we heard that spreading news about trials is somewhat encouraged. So whilst Trish's story is already in the public domain can Scancells hand still be forced into releasing data sooner than planned i.e. because patients famlies, hospital staff etc. will be getting an idea of results before others?

"My main take apart from the tech successes plus the validation of the macmillan poster is that BioNTech have a strong interest alongside others in Modi1 or more. Plus other deals are resource limited."

We knew about the Macmillan poster, but IMO "BioNTech have a strong interest alongside others in Modi1 or more" is also a bit of a game changer too IMO. We know the close ties between them already exist but I'm actually a little surprised they discussed this, or at least named Biontech in this instance? Wouldn't they normally say "a large European biotech" etc?

P.s. Massive thanks Botski, will have a proper listen when i get a chance.

Btw should the zip contain 2 or 3 files?

Biotech or BioNtech?

To be honest I'd be shocked if just about every major bio "isn't" interested. IMO.

Thanks bazookarj.

Think I've find a direct page:
https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/history/NCT05329532?V_3=View#StudyPageTop