Member Info for WelshFalcon

Please explain @xviolet? What point did he/she make?

It was a wild prediction that turned out not to be true, with an admission that it was due to drink! How is that making a point?

BBP, you credit him/her with the ability to think?

Thanks, I can visualise better now.

Thanks for this @Bamps.

The inference I take is that the g/t numbers we see on the NCM reports (assays) are relative to the sample from which it was taken? (i.e. weight of gold vs the total weight of the sample) So, the higher the specific gravity, the lower the volume (but not weight) of material that needs to be transported to Telfer to get a given amount of gold.

I think that bit all makes sense, but when we look at the copper, this is expressed as a percentage. What is it a percentage of? weight? volume?

Just trying to add to my rapidly expanding knowledge about all things re mineral extraction.

Is this the delayed 11am news you promised on 9th June?

Maybe it's just more bovine smelly stuff?

"kicked down the road" being a well known financial strategy?

Whatever you are taking, do tell us what it is. We can all then avoid it's obvious disasterous results!

The question that should have been asked? Something about the 65,000m drilling in six months vs the number of drills being reported. Some insight into what is causing an apparent delay would be useful. Especially as SB has talked about 45,000m to come, so there is some 20,000m floating around somewhere!

Right interview, wrong interviewer (or poor questions). I much prefer Katie.

I think you are confusing it with 'a shed load'. Big shed, though!

It's Lode not Load........

The Haveiron monster just poked his head above ground and stuck two fingers up at all the nearology players. "who's the daddy?" he was heard to say....

To the NW a low groan was heard from the area around Goliath....

Oh My!

@calamari a full ISA doesn't prevent you from investing more!!!

You still have your capital gains allowance so, assuming you have the cash, you can still buy - transferring your holding (plus any associated capital gain) to your ISA next year. Even if you go through the CGT allowance, and have to pay some tax, it's small beer vs your gain (after the allowance).

If you have a SIPP, use that too.

Never let the tax system make you shy of investing - learn, understand it and use the tax system to your advantage.

Spot on @Oil.

Happy Falcon here - if a little confused re number of holes....

In time, my golden ticket will be worth ????????? (That's lots)

7 drill I think, great intercepts. Actually a fantastic result. But more drills were expected.

Great drill intercepts, but only a handful of holes reported!

Lots of growth drilling still out there somewhere.

I'm sure there are many and varied theories as to what the hidden meaning / agenda the report has.

Some even think it is simply there to give credence to the 25p share option figure.

Me, I'm quite simple. I think that they have looked at all the information available and have produced a considered report of their findings. The playing silly buggers type stuff is best left to government agencies.

One thing is for sure is that they will be wrong! Mathematically, they will be either too high or too low. It is rare that a prediction is spot on. My vote is for higher.....

It's not been approved yet so only available through trials (or the MAP if you can get a hospital to sign you up).

Once again, in case you missed it the first time:

"I didn't advocate Warfarin at all. I posed the question " Maybe a prescription blood and clot busting drug would have been a better candidate?". Warfarin was simply an example as is "Warfarin for example"."

Nice try @Andy. deleting the punctuation to change the meaning - oh dear.

To clarify, here is the whole paragraph (anyone can scroll up to check):
"Maybe a prescription blood and clot busting drug would have been a better candidate? Warfarin for example, much more effective. Or maybe was trialling Aspirin more of a publicity stunt?"

1/10 - more homework needed, and do try to concentrate better in class!

Thank you SanDiego, but can you flesh out why you appear to think Horby etal. are so correct in the drugs they have chosen to trial?

Why was kicking SNG001 off the RECOVERY trial a good thing? Why is trialling Aspirin better than another (prescription) blood thinning drug?

I am really interested in your viewpoint, but backed up with a little insight. Just trusting 'these medical experts' doesn't cut it for me.

Help us all to understand instead of just snipping.