Member Info for Warthog4

Best of luck Azz.
I emailed them days ago along the same lines-needless to say no response-typical corporate arrogance/ignorance.

".....value of sp should be around 8p....."
This BB is full of "should be: "could be: "might be" : "possible": "hopefully", comments and has been for over 10 years.
Let's hope that one day something actually happens-none of us is getting any younger.

Bigtimer. They never run out of money-just ask us for more by diluting our holdings value even further-£5 million in last 6 years.
TM should really leave presentations to the professionals- he does more harm than good and it doesn't matter how b....y wonderful our products(?) they have to be sold hard for the big boys to take notice. At present we are about 350% up on this time last year-it remains to be seen if it just doesn't just drift back again as in the past.

tyk2 jak1 for psoriasis
Sareum made encouraging noises about it as well-6 years ago, and since???

Thoth. Perhaps you had in mind:-
"To widen the market and to narrow the competition, is always the interest of the dealers…"

I may be spared the stuttering-system won't allow registration unless you can confirm you are a company.

Go, get you out! Make haste! Ye venal slaves be gone! So! Take away that shining bauble there, and lock up the doors.

In the name of God, go!

"Barclays once took 5 days to pay me the dividend on their own shares!"

What do you expect dealing with High Street banks which, nowadays, are little better than betting shops and staffed accordingly.

Only squillions!!
Hoary old joke. During the Gulf War POTUS asked for the daily casualties figure. When he was told three Brazilian soldiers had been killed he burst into floods of tears and eventually composed himself sufficiently to ask "how many is a brazilian"
Oh well-suit yourself

The reverse is also true-every time we have a big gain we retrace rapidly although having said that we are up 375% on this time last year. Would that this will be repeated in 2021 but...............

Yes, but take a careful look at the 5or 6 trades around the same time-they're all a bit fishy and in any case the arithmetic of the Buy you highlight just does not add up.

Well, they have every year for the last 6 years to the tune of £4.9million so don't see 2021 being any exception

...due today. Anybody received theirs yet?

Just get rid of the sodding shorters-full stop- odious little parasites.

"....when the mugs in this country vote for Brexit...."
Presumably you are referring to those folk who objected strongly to being told how to run their lives by a bunch of overpaid garlic crunchers living high on the hog in Brussels, constituting one of the most corruption riddled entities in the World?

Hope you're right ShrewdDude- down 30% in a week ain't funny-dunno how those people at SFO sleep at night knowing a company they are investigating is being systematically destroyed by their meddling.

"Barclays highlighted that a new chief executive on the way, is was unsurprising that the company ....."
Doesn't make sense.

".....the nature of communication between a private investigator and the agency."
"The Agency" being no less than The Director Herself!! You couldn't make it up-what a lack of professionalism and common sense.

A charitable view SEA7 and I hope you are right. Unfortunately Government Departments have a long history of incompetence and the SFO is no exception having been found wanting on several occasions at great cost to the taxpayers.
Vast swathes of the folk in this country have no faith or trust in Government anymore and I have to say I am one of them, viewing their holier than thou attitude with utter contempt.

".....but its not in SFO interest to put a company out of business."
They couldn't care less my Friend. They're Civil Servants, totally unaccountable to anyone (don't forget they're a "Non Ministerial Government Department") and just counting the days to a lovely taxpayer funded 100% safe index-linked pension.
A company goes out of business because of their dilatory behaviour? No problem- a bit of flak from the press for a few days, some letters to "The Times", indignant questions in the house then a few months later it all dies down and the SFO moves on to its next victim. Sue them I hear you say-right. Have you ever tried suing the government- very costly and very time consuming. If the company is out of business who pays for it all?

On another subject have just had a look at Petrofac's figures for the 4 years during which Lufkin dished out about $53million
in inducements to do business. The revenue for those 4 years totalled $19.414 BILLION so I would suggest it would have been very easy for 4 senior executives in cahoots to hide the payment of such comparatively trifling sums. To bring it downscale a bit, similar to having received $19,414 and losing $53 of it somewhere.