Member Info for VINCE72

Anyways switch off till Jan.

It will be January before announcement could well be they are signed nxt week. But for maximum effect it will be announced when all the relevant people are back from Xmas hols.

No difference whether Dec or Jan to me, But I'm pretty tired of hearing when something is going to happen and it doesn't.

Jason has mentioned C5 and C6 chain sugars a number of times jackg , so that's not news at all.

As for the tripartite agreement, Jason was quite affirmative in the proactive and IMC that the agreements would be signed in December, so the apologists need to stop making excuses that JM has overplayed his hand again.

Https://splash247.com/eu-ets-costs-laid-bare/

Costs and Environmental pledges about to kick in properly.

So the message to take from all these meetings, whether Shipping forums or COP,, year in year out is that we need to scale up the intermediate solutions to allow transition to more longer term solutions.

So sign the tripartite agreement this month and let's get it started and stop talking about it.

Https://shipandbunker.com/news/am/500701-us-politicians-seek-to-subsidise-biofuel-use-in-shipping

Good news if we ever get Low Sulphur BioMsar up and running.

Like HF14 said, Bud Darr cannot announce any commercially sensitive info unless a RNS has been issued first, and personally I would think Bud Darr is on the fringes of actual details of what's, going on regards fuel specifics other than generalities.

Https://splash247.com/200-per-container-cost-gap-for-zero-emissions-shipping/

Containerlines have been busy calculating what extra costs new fuels will bring to their clients. At TPM, container shipping’s top event, in Long Beach this February, Jeremy Nixon, the CEO of Japanese liner Ocean Network Express (ONE) told delegates the cost of fuel for containerships today is about $1,000 per feu.

That’s roughly what the cost component is of using carbon fuel. These new fuels are going to be two or three times more expensive. So, potentially $2,000-3,000 will be the future fuel cost of moving a 40-foot container,” Nixon said

Sobering thought for those Shipping lines looking on towards the MSC trials.

From what I have read on proceedings at COP28, the conversations taking place are quite determined to come up with an end date for the use of Fossil Fuels.

The results yesterday from QED give clear results and a pathway for the accomplishment of this within the shipping sector.

The incentive to get this deal signed couldn't be more clearer and profitable for that first mover.

Also to keep that timeline on track for Q2 start for the trial, the deal has to be signed within the next week or so.

Once that happens, it's game on. The certainty is there for LTH that the hard slog is behind us and from now on the results will speak for themselves first with glycerine based BioMsar and ultimately Net Zero Bio Msar.

The results yesterday will hopefully make a lot of potential customers sit upright to take notice of just how significant it could be for them and their buisness.

And it all starts with the signing of the tripartite agreement.

Another amazing day, glad for everyone who has supported QED through lots of thick and thin.

These results now put QED in a commanding position. I think an announcement will be made outside of COP28, either this week or early nxt.

It would be good this week, then Bud Darr can stand on stage and mention that we are pioneering new Alternative Biofuels with an innovative UK company that is at the forefront of this technology and look forward to scaling up for use through our fleet.

While QED might not be mention, those in the industry will know who it is, and will be lining up to see the results of the trial.

Exciting times for sure. Long may they continue, we all deserve it for all the years of support we have shown.

Good news then 46G. Happy to leave that sorry episode parked then.

He'll only come back under another nom de plume.

Well said AKHM, when I don't agree with somebody's positive point of view I don't comment on it, why because its a forum and its freedom of speech and they are entitled.

But and this was a problem with the forum as well, somebody makes an alternative viewpoint which might be interpreted as negative and may sound like so, but is a genuine concern or thought and so you post it and EVERY time you can guarantee someone will try to have a pop at you for being a de-ramper or having a motive or attacking your own investment blah blah blah when on fact it's just a concern that you want to put forth.

Look at the post of 16.53 and its follow up and see who the trouble maker is and how people still continually engage this clown.

No need to worry Wonga, somebody buys me a large Glenfarclas 40 year old and ill be as quiet as a church mouse.

If people are wondering if I'm hiding under a stone, I'm not.

Yes the rise is wonderful and I'm cautiously optimistic, but until we get an RNS saying the tripartite agreement is signed...I'll remain just that cautious.

I hold every share I've ever purchased, I haven't purchased anymore ( talking the share down and finding 25k down the sofa and that kind of crap).

And haven't traded any, which I'm pretty sure TurdStock will have done.

Yes PR there is informed debate on the forum I agree some good posters,Ianb being a great example.

But I totally disagree on the debate on playground behaviour.

Once again I'll clarify my position.

All this animosity between myself and the forum stems from the fact I called out one of the administrators on his bullying way of debate. The rest of the admins ignored this, they turned off the ability for me to post, the day after the argument. If I wanted to post I had to have the post vetted and approved.

However that admin never got the same treatment, he's antagonised other members with his acerbic attitude and still nothing happened.

The last incidence was DustofNations then accusing me of doom scrolling articles on purpose to find fault with QED ( no need for me to do that JM and the board do that without any help)

Again I couldn't reply because that ability to reply was still turned off, as well as the email.

And yet the behaviour that hypocrites like Anusol H berate on the forum, come here and exhibit the same behaviour including derogatory comments that lots of forum members have for those who post on LSE.

So as far as playground behaviour is concerned the administration is quite versed in the art.

Your tigers are your triggers Qpulse, nobody else's. People's opinions on a public forum are their reflections of how they perceive how everything is going.

People look through different filters, if you want debate that is only one sided, where the management are praised in high regard, you should join the forum, where to some JM and the board are nothing less than saints.

To some of us who have investor fatigue waiting for this holy grail of a product to live upto its potential, we have a different point of view.

That will change if and when the facts change.

And when has what JM said ever come true.

Again HF, that's an opinion. So far nothing any of has predicted has panned out that way.

No doubt at the AGM, JM will tell us everything is on track until some time in Q1 when we are told it isn't.