Member Info for VINCE72

it isn't the price akhm that's ******* people off, it's no news other than minutiae month on month, year on year.

we are constantly told they are keen.....really. love to see if they were ecstatic about using it.

It boils down to this, all this time, all this talk l, all these fund raises, all the testing, all the rhetoric and still we have...nothing to speak of. That is the plain and simple facts, just more promises that its imminent, not if but when etc etc etc. The whole story has become stale and effing boring. How great our wonderful is and how it's going to change the world and we still have sold a drop of it

Ahh the old talk it down to buy cheaper line, at this moment in time I wouldn't put more money in this if it was the same price as UKOG, I want definitive news, not the same old bluster year after year. Talk it down, who needs to do that, its performance is doing that for it, JM's over promise/ under deliver is why we are were we are.

Coupled with the fact there might be more testing involved, utter crap.

Why bother 46G, it gets you nowhere, standard replies. No urgency from any of our projects, just talk talk talk, test, test, test. I'm getting to the point where I'm pretty much done with QED.

Like I've said before, there just does not seem any urgency at all from these parties, the rhetoric of wanting of climate change, MSC's role in playing its part etc and all the conferences Bud Darr seems to attend preaching this stuff is completely at odds with the reality. Day after day, week after week MSC are still burning HFO. I'm beginning to smell a large whiff of BS.

Shareholders highlighted the comments made at the AGM re contracts being in place by the end of December. Quadrise stated that they had been told that this was achievable by the other parties although availability of resources along with governance processes in those organisations had ultimately not allowed that to happen. Quadrise emphasised that there were no fundamental issues or aspects to be resolved which were preventing progress.

I do not get how this statement above marries up with the fact that nearly 3 months later and we are still waiting.

How could they ever believe contracts could be signed in December.

Https://splash247.com/nike-ties-the-knot-with-cma-cgm/

Https://ecoteqenergy.com/news/details/ecoteq-energy-asa-last-trading-day-on-notc-february-29-2024?fbclid=IwAR3gtX1j9_DI7QiQitDGv0nEmWL488W3pVF1XRpRsvvgNmjT7wAc3IENCrM

As an energy company with focus on cleantech and with assets in Utah, USA, Ecoteq's primary mission is to deliver locally sourced clean energy to the US market

Qpulse, I gave credit to B61 earlier for the write up and sharing of information, as for general all round thanks, seeing you have singled me out for this, no I haven't given all round thanks . An omission on my part, so thanks to all those concerned who attended.

But back to you Qpulse, I don't think anybody on the forum would really lose much sleep for that admission seeing my popularity is flatter than a witches tit, but thanks for your pedantry I stand admonished.

BfSco, well I could only go off what I interpreted when I read the summary, again only time will tell, but I think it will be signed, just not in the nxt few weeks to months, it seems Morroccan due diligence takes a kittle more time than most.

Fair points DON, I agree that Morocco is more than just a contract, it is a showcase for the industrial use of our product and PI's tineframes and Client timeframes are never aligned.

So once again, I'm going nowhere with regards my investment, I still hold and WANT and DESIRE, QED to succeed. Just have to be patient for a longer.

After reading the report and thanks to B61 for putting it together, I am underwhelmed with regards to Morocco tbh.

With the time its taken to get to this stage, negotiations for a contract will obviously not go as quickly as we hope, I see from my point of view a contract signing in Q3 , Aug/Sep and even then negotiations for a refinery ( Let's admit it, it's Cepsa) will possibly take another 3 months or so, with a then installation of 6 months depending if the fuel lines in the refinery are in good condition. So we'll not be providing fuel to " The Client" until mid 2025 at the earliest.

As for MSC if we can get the contracts signed by end of Mar, I'll be happy, but again I see it more towards back of Apr, beginning of May, which means like I said in an earlier post, I see the trial not starting until mid to late Q3.

But that's my opinion and if I'm wrong, I'm wrong, but that's what an opinion board is for....opinions.

Unfortunately good news and positive vibes will always bring out the doomsters. Always looking for a negative angle to suit their agenda. It's so blatantly obvious.......

Listen to this garbage, again alternative points of view, not welcomed, discussion not tolerated. Like your 9 posts have added anything to anywhere. Jeessus.

While I've had my differences with those on the forum and am not very popular over there ( or here Lol ) , I am glad that QED saw fit to keep a promise in keeping shareholders in the loop and updated and so look forward to reading anything at the moment that can give me some semblance of things actually are on track.

Well that's what happens Willswag when points of view from both sides aren't allowed and only talk of how this is going to the moon and let's all look forward to the Pound party BS is tolerated.

Once again reading some of these posts is just as off putting as those those who are claimed to be serial moaners.

SJS says

Yes there is an element of frustration but I am not going to analyse day by day (Would drive me insane) and the people that do obviously have have their own agendas (we all know who they are!). GLA

Why, just why if somebody posts something opposite in opion that disagrees with the prevailing attitude, do they have to have a motive. Can't they just be presenting an alternative opinion or just a concern that they maybe thinking. Who are they then. Stockcheque, McHaggisRow who does nothing but serially pump QED. Do you like his mood music then.

PharaohRoacher.

Peppering Jason’s inbox with ‘you said December; it’s now almost March’ snotograms doesn’t help QED progress contracts either. If anything it diverts limited resources.

I know for one I'm not doing that, wouldn't get a reply even if I did.

Just like elsewhere open debate, alternative opinions are tried to be shot down by those who don't like to hear a different opinion to what they believe or should I say hope will happen.

I quoted end of 2025 because jackg stated by end of 2025 we'll all be very rich, but we've said that for God knows how long.

So maybe the Wee man ,Whisky and all those quick to pour cold water on other opinions should just remember it's a public bulletin board with random Jeff's posting opinions and thoughts.....and until proven nothing is fact.

Yeah BarkingCrazy. Only have to look at clowns like Whiskyman, who embarass themselves with a a lot of the drivel IT posts. I got a good feeling that IT itself is a Nom de plume from another place, am I right Wee man.

Funny really, how end of 2025 is now acceptable for sucess ,seems the acceptance of over promises and under delivery is now the accepted position from a lot of the glass half full types.

I personally think it would be a good collaboration for Goodfuels and QED to team up in this area, since QED have said they testing various options with regards fuel sources.

But hey, what do I know, just an opinion. Pretty sure those more knowledgeable from other sources and places wouldn't agree.