Member Info for Vander

So where are they in set up?

Presumably installed new smiths scanners in Ndjili, trained staff, but not yet started on the loss making part of the operation- the other 4 airports

An orphan disease is a rare disease or condition that affects fewer than 200,000 people in the United States.

Ie the prevalence of the disease = no of people with the condition at a given time- it is not a rate (per year for example)

Also the number of glaucoma surgeries in USA in 2021 was 221,602- ie a bit more than mentioned

Https://www.fda.gov/industry/medical-products-rare-diseases-and-conditions/designating-orphan-product-drugs-and-biological-products

Is the treatment of post surgical scarring for glaucoma a rare condition? there are some benefits if so- but does not change the need for clinical trials and licencing

My understanding is that RVA made profit in Ndjili and losses in the other four airports

It’s worth bearing this in mind if the WSG set up is staggered

This is not an investment as the odds are akin to gambling. Over the past 17yrs all of fowler’s promises have been calculated lies- the odds are similar to a rigged casino where the fowlers always win

To give fowler his due he has succeeded in launching multiple successful placings and has not yet suffered a fraud charge or even an FCA investigation.

The DRC contract does exist but the odds are hidden

In Liberia the port stakeholders immediately rebelled against the proposed increase in tariff required to pay Wsg- one of the reasons the contract immediately failed

Maybe the new RVA leaders have not thought the contract through properly- shungu was reluctant to employ fowler- presumably because wsg are too expensive for the passengers outside Ndjili

The 90 day set up period began in April 2024, with fowler indicating revenues to flow from July 2024

Has he provided an explanation for the delay

Will RVA officers screen for mpox?

First case arrived in Sweden last week

The airline payments are not digitalised and paid in travel agents- part of the reason the go pass fee went missing

The main risk is not now but in 1-2 years when the DRC gov accuses Wsg/ fowler of fraud

The go- pass fee was also charged directly from the airlines since 2019

https://en.zoom-eco.net/breaking-news/drc-government-incorporates-idef-into-the-cost-of-airfare/

Aiming: It’s good to see you have kept faith in fowler after the unremitting failure of the last decade and the hundreds of misleading RNS and massive dilution

Maybe this time will be different

Aiming- where do you see Wsg in 3 yrs?

Do believe the DRC contract will still be in place?

This needs committed support by a commercial partner and dedicated scientists who will try drive the financial and clinical development process forward

Small PIs will pay Nigel’s salary over the next decade until his retirement but much more is needed

None. This was not a competitive tender

DRC will consume eat fowler whole unfortunately

Fowler must wake up in the morning- open the curtains-stare over the Oxfordshire countryside- and shout Yes! At last!- clench his fist- repeat DRC

SRI undertakes client sponsored research in various areas of scientific research

Its has a system of cargo delivery (mgs) which delivers various moieties inc nanoparticles

Nuvec is also a delivery vehicle- likely to need enhancement or it will not progress (commercially)

Nuvec protects the nucleic acid from enzymatic breakdown and carries more than one rna (for example)

Mgs uses peptides to better target cells/organelles

There is some focus on eventual commercial development, although N4p has had similar collaborations with non profit organisations before

Who funds what? What are the milestones/timelines?

Gibbo you can’t hide WSG’s past

New investors only need to look at the SP graph and history of management dishonesty and incompetence

WSG has taken a high risk strategy in DRC which much larger companies with much higher competence and resources have declined.

Fowler is not afraid to gamble our money and also to encourage SP speculation prior to placements- there have been tens of MoUs which have faded into a 20 year mist

Let’s hope the Sierra queen fiasco and tema are not repeated. Both were trumpeted by fowler as transformational contracts (worth ‘hundreds of million usd’) and the ferry was loss making

It will take a while to make a judgement on this- the least reliable evidence from fowler’s RNS- new investors would be wise not to take these at face value and do careful research

It will take a while to see through the smoke screen

Delusional but hopeful

The main issues are similar to tema

Managing a problematic workforce in a faraway unstable environment in multiple locations (inc volcano hit war torn Goma)

Negotiating a sensible contract which delivers a profit (rather than a loss)

Fowler will trumpet parts of the contract and forget to mention the important dodgy bits

Maccer- you are a long term trader here- tell us how fowler delivered the Tema contract