RE: News11 Dec 2019 15:38
The way I see it :
* IF , 38 were a total disaster they would have been required to RNS by now .
* IF , they were still testing , it would be perfectly reasonable (sensible) for them to wait until tests were complete .
* IF , there had been some improvement with 16 they would be required to RNS .
* if , 3D had been completed they would have been required to RNS .
* IF , and when they sell the oil in storage , they will be required to RNS .
* IF , there had been a material change in their finances / operations plan they would have been required to RNS .
* IF , there were preliminary ongoing talks about an acquisition , contract or T/O they may be bound by confidentiality agreements .
Of course all the above may be ongoing and /or incomplete , in which case they would not necessarily be required to update the market until they have been completed .
This is a very painful time for shareholders , but after the 16 fiasco I fully understand just why the BoD are staying tight lipped until they can report with competence and total honesty , hopefully with some seriously positive news . Another PR charade like 16 would be nothing short of disastrous .
I`m as frustrated as others , but remain very positive about the final outcome because there is so much more to come ;
AND :
AF, JF , BAGO , 3D and their drilling program next year could see a dramatic turn in fortunes .
GL.