Member Info for Urraca

I agree with Happy and Computer. The tests were ordered, provided, and used. I've said before that I've been a Biobank participant since it started, I volunteered to participate in this testing exercise, I got a test kit that was clearly marked as manufactured by Abingdon, I used it and reported the result. So I am 100% sure that the kits were provided and used. They must therefore be paid for. The actual basis of the GoodLaw case is that the Govt flouted EU procurement rules at a time when they were still meant to apply, during the Brexit transition period. And of course GoodLaw is run by Jolyon Maughan, a ferocious remainer who was heavily involved in the lawfare attempts to overturn the referendum result. And don't forget, during the transition period, the unforeseen pandemic was a national, nay, international emergency, during which the Govt over-ruled the EU pettifogging bureaucracy which caused such a dreadful mess and thousands of needless deaths over on the continent. If we don't get paid we'll have a much stronger basis to sue the Govt than GoodLaw.

Dunno, but ouch

It's a good post Chris, and I did check BioPorto out. But the RNS does provide greater certainty that ABDX 's build out of manufacturing capacity will be put to revenue generating production. And the market is meant to be forward looking. I still think the SP here is where it is because there is a persistent seller offloading a pretty large volume - but slowly, so as not to utterly crater the price.

Absolutely ridiculous, but I guess the seller is still off-loading. After that news, it's crazy, but there you go.

Very reassuring that their manufacturing capacity is going to get used, which means revenues will start flowing in.

And holding here. Starting to feel a bit thankless.

Can we hold yesterday's modest rise and build on it, or will the seller resume? Is the seller done?

Please can you post a link to the judgement. I'd like to read it too.

Getting rid of Matt Handcuck will see Innova booted into the long grass and UK tests finally getting used?

If it's skeletons in the cupboard then they're selling on inside info and risking jail, plus confiscation of proceeds. Just someone desperate for money - or maybe pre IPO and cashing in now that they can, regardless of where the sp might be going,

23k shares sold at 8:14; 15k at 11:17; and almost 27k just before 1:30. Is the seller about exhausted? Or just hitting the bottom of what they're prepared to sell at? Either way, it's quite a bounce on virtually no volume. If the seller would just stop, the sp should recover pretty quickly.

Very little difference between buys and sells, and yet a 9% plunge to incredible lows. WTF?

If the DHSC dispute has been resolved DHSC officials know about it. It is market sensitive information. They have a duty to report it to the market immediately.

Sir Digby, if resolution with DHSC had been reached, that would have to be RNSed straight away. As would any change in expectation of income. So I now expect the results next week to reiterate the position outlined in the previous RNSs. I did have a back of the fag packet valuation of around £7 based on previous anticipated revenues. As they have halved, then, yes, £3.50 is about right. But, critically, this is without factoring in future revenues. The roadmap to the future, which I strongly expect to be included in the results, will be the major factor which sparks the reraye.

Volume, strong buying, good rise after a lurch down this morning on nothing much. Decent day.

Never seen a Board seem to revel in bad news so much. Incredible. Got to be verging on a breach of their fiduciary duties.

Showing as exactly 2pm, so a UT auction I'm guessing

I'll buy that for a dollar! As the catchphrase went on Robocop. I thought, back in the day, Schlum's part ownership was hailed as a validation of Parsons's BS.

But don't forget ABDX only know what major shareholders tell them. They have no waynof tracking exchanges of ownership through the markets.

Anyway https://twitter.com/i/events/1404016301891227653

That the Court does NOT sanction the restructuring plan. Entirely in the hands of the Court now. Don't do anything that could imperil the outcome.