RE: Looks cheap29 Mar 2022 10:15
Big shame, really. When I looked at the potential for this company, I did a comparison using a different sector but with an existing successful product. I judged that the CHLL products would have similar potential. I came up with an annual minimum turnover of £2 billion per annum. This estimate included a factor for the competition. It all appears to have gone horribly wrong. On top of all this, I don't believe that the current market conditions are favourable for a fledgling product, particularly one that is struggling to leave the nest. That's it from me, I have interests elsewhere, bye.