The latest Investing Matters Podcast episode featuring Jeremy Skillington, CEO of Poolbeg Pharma has just been released. Listen here.
It looks like Systematica have closed their short position.
Paid trolls: you don't hear from them for months and then suddenly, on a price rise, they appear out of nowhere.
They should be banned from the forums.
Was he negotiating a pyramid selling scheme?
Don't forget that this company set off on its current course at the worst possible time for a fledgling company: right in the heart of the Covid pandemic. I wasn't sure if it would survive, to be honest. Its back in now with a fighting chance, I think, thanks to the work of Callum and others, and the continued support of shareholders.
Hence, Systematica in profit on their short position.
Longer-term, we are confident that our diversified strategy will continue to deliver significant value for shareholders, with our investment in new content verticals and capabilities underpinning our growth ambitions.
Looks like I've hit a sore point there Kat. Are you a paid ramper/deramper then?
There is a distinction, because paid rampers/derampers are not expressing an honest opinion, but are deliberately posting biased information according to the dictates of the company involved.
Pretty stupid and asenine of you to think otherwise, isn't it?
About a year ago, I found a paid ramper who was jumping around various forums posting ramping messages. So far, I haven't outed any paid derampers, but you can be sure that they are here.
Recently, many hedge fund managers had to reduce positions due to the sharp rise in UK indices. You can bet they pay good money to companies who have people posting negatively on these forums.
I think that this type of posting should be banned.
It is basically fraud and the hedge funds profit at the expense of the average punter. Sharp practice or fraud: what do you think?
About a year ago, I found a paid ramper who was jumping around various forums posting ramping messages. So far, I haven't outed any paid derampers, but you can be sure that they are here.
Recently, many hedge fund managers had to reduce positions due to the sharp rise in UK indices. You can bet they pay good money to companies who have people posting negatively on these forums.
I think that this type of posting should be banned.
It is basically fraud and the hedge funds profit at the expense of the average punter. Sharp practice or fraud: what do you think?
Maybe they're trying to lose money to reduce their tax bill. Who knows.
Funny that these people appear now, but where were they when the share price was 2p?
Nowhere to be seen.
By the way, I've asked LSE what their policy is regarding paid posters. That is, posters who get paid by companies to either ramp or de-ramp a company. Do they get banned if discovered to be receiving payments for posts?
Same for TROLLS. Do they get banned if discovered? Will see what they have to say.
Take "Critical Metal" for instance. NO income.
I appreciate input where this is genuine.
PAID posters and clever but detractive TROLLS are not welcome here.
Come on Guys, play nice! It is clear that the company is heading in the right direction.
The figures for the Return on Capital Employed uphold this view.
Income is disappointing, but at least there IS an income and it is heading in the right direction.
This is more than can be said for other companies that are being invested in by some of the characters here (put your name here if the cap fits!).
Luv and peace, Hank.
Just to let you know, the missing short transaction has mysteriously appeared in today's FCA report, at number 73 in the chart.
Lse say that they are going to raise this with their data supplier
Yes I agree, something confusing going on here. I will ask lse to clarify.
Maybe we should consider the dangers of having 230V of power coursing around our houses, when we could easily transform this down to 12V at the mains entry point. This is the dangerous element in our energy supply network. What are the government doing about it, anyone know?
Check it yourself: http://www.fca.org.uk/static/documents/short-positions-daily-update.xls
Sorry, just to state this again, the FCA data published today only lists AHL as holding a 0.81% short position. Could someone advise where the 0.9% comes from if you have already checked the data yourself?