Member Info for Tyke68

Semantic

Good morning and thank you for that clarification. I stand corrected in what I posted.

I assume that the company will let us know when and where the results have been posted. I am guessing it will be appear on something like this search engine under CC. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Christopher-Chitambar

Anyway I hope you are well and have a good rest of the weekend

Thanks

Something to think about if the results are as good as we hope, then the MCW staff may do the hard work of getting a partner or buyer for us.

I am sure they will not want their many years of hard, possible groundbreaking, work to go to waste. Yes they are doing a paediatric trial but that is many years behind our IB003 completed phase 1.

Think of how many contacts, including drug companies, they may have and what they will tell them. All the conferences they attend where they could present their findings. All the journals they could get it published in. We only need 1 or 2 people from companies or medical establishments to commit to doing a phase 2. We know at least one partner was interested. Maybe when the results are published they may come back knocking on our door.

Then maybe everybody’s AI valuations may come to fruition.

We should know within 30 days or less, as we don’t when the results were actually submitted, if IB003 could be the magical cancer treatment elixir.

Then that could lead to a great weekend!

Thanks

Just found this which may explain the delay in the results being published

“ ContentThe Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) is the official legal print publication containing the codification of the general and permanent rules published in the Federal Register by the departments and agencies of the Federal Government. The Electronic Code of Federal Regulations (eCFR) is a continuously updated online version of the CFR. It is not an official legal edition of the CFR. Learn more about the eCFR, its status, and the editorial process.

§ 11.52 By when will the NIH Director post submitted clinical trial results information?

Except for clinical trial results information submitted under section 402(j)(4)(A) of the PHS Act and § 11.60, the Director will post publicly clinical trial results information on ClinicalTrials.gov not later than 30 calendar days after the date of submission.”

So hopefully early March and we know how good the results are.

Have a good weekend everybody

Thanks

Max

You know how sceptical of AI I am. So $80m+ would mean about 25p per share. If that happened I think you could just about persuade me that AI is useful as I was driving my Porsche (or Volvo)

Unfortunately as of tonight I think my 0p is closer. We can but hope but what a weekend that would be if it happened.

Thanks

Max

I think when we do get the results it may be a 1pm not 7am as USA based. But who knows

Thanks

Thanks Try

Try no it doesn’t include you. BB you never let me know the email amounts

Thanks

HL still willing to buy a million shares at 0.42p

The question is why?

Thanks

Max

I thought EAP was at cost, I may be wrong, as we then get access to the real world data

Thanks

Malletp

I think it’s well known on here I don’t do AI or social media. I have children who understand IT far more than I do and say AI searches can be unreliable and manipulated.

Semantic likes AI, you have that in common.

Until AI can be trusted to run a vending machine honestly I will just stick to Google thanks.

I have also stated on numerous occasions that GaM may be worth a lot of money but at the moment its value to us shareholders is zero. I think Kane expressed this more succinctly recently.

Thanks

Max

HL still willing to buy a million at 0.42p. More news to follow maybe?

Thanks

Mallettp

I think the last part of today’s RNS “ In the current year we are projecting a small profit and importantly, expect to have sufficient working capital without the need to approach shareholders for new funds before this year end and hopefully beyond." Hopefully this implies the shenanigans are now finished.

We are generating a profit, it sounds good for Kirkstall. Are you no longer confident that GaM data and possible PRV has a value?

Maybe just maybe the board have listened to our disquiet and want to try and increase the sp and they will also reap the benefits of this via their shareholdings.

Thanks

Thanks cautious

In the circumstances I think we have all being really positive or we wouldn’t still be here.

Regarding the results I am guessing it is because not yet published and some sort of independent peer review may have to take place first. Maybe Onceaday or somebody else may know more about the hurdles to full publication.

As silly as it sounds we only need somebody like Google or the gates foundation to see the potential of GaM for use in various cancer treatments and this could increase exponentially very quickly. Somebody important and or wealthy looking for help for a friend or family member with GBM may come across GaM and wish phase 2 to occur and willing to finance it. Anything which helps increase life expectancy deserves to be investigated in my opinion.

Thanks

Cheers Max

Still far too big. They want our shares cheap that’s for sure.

Thanks

Just seen the spread 50%. That is ridiculous, something happening.

Thanks

Well they seemed to know a RNS was due with their attempt at buying yesterday. So do they know what the phase 1 results show? Just a thought but we never know. It would be good if we saw the Schmainda’s invest some of their own money.

Let’s wait and see

Thanks

HL will buy over a million shares from you but at less than 0.42p. They seem to be acquiring shares but very cheaply, they were quoting 0.456p earlier today for less than 1 million.

Thanks

Morning

Anybody interested in the follow up to all the recent kerfuffle over at IBAI then there has been a RNS released today with a comprehensive update.

Unfortunately it is not showing up on this site for whatever reason. So here is the link

https://www.londonstockexchange.com/news-article/IBAI/update-and-ib-nimble-webinar-27-february-2026/17455454

Thanks for all your help previously

Tyke

Cl

Hopefully that may now change with more information being shared.

There is no logical way this tech is worth just over a million pounds

What is really apparent is what I said last week, and got vehemently disagreed with, is that GaM is currently worth zero. Now hopefully when the results get published then maybe we might get a spike and some bigger fish interested in acquiring the phase 1 data. They could buy the data and save themselves millions and years if they wanted to pursue GaM via a phase 2 with all or designations. Hopefully we get a RNS about the results soon.

If the normal pattern of trading follows the people may buy a few shares later in the afternoon leading to a slight uptick in the sp. Max said MMs wanted to buy over a million shares yesterday have they got a buyer lined up.

Thanks

Just read it.

Well we were told a comprehensive update was coming and I would call that comprehensive. Thank you MS/TB and team. I would call it very honest about they have been trying to do too much, we have stated that on numerous occasions.

Only revenue mentioned, from first glance, was Kirkstall and now we know more that does now sound a wise investment as per what TB was alluding to.

GAM, resulted submitted and maybe still has value if people want our data let’s wait and see.

The last paragraph from TB acknowledges how we all feel.

Me personally I am happy with that and hope what we did a few weeks back contributed to that comprehensive update being released. Thank you everybody for that.

Now let’s see how the sp reacts. Good news normally equals a drop, let’s hope we get surprised.

Thanks