Member Info for tweedly

Not AI per se in the past, but a sufficient amount of programming work to create personas, creating noise.

>AI

I'm fairly sure they've been on stock chat boards for 15/20 years, just the ones over the past year or two require a bit less hand holding.

Presumably the 'noise' on certain threads as it always has been is just to sucker in most cash for trading.

Stockcheque feeling a bit boisterous again and posting his boilerplate ramps.

It'll be interesting to see if Helikon have reduced their short. Unusual volume.

Caveat for any non-traders is there's no material income coming in for AFC, same as all the dullards have mentioned here time and again.

...Ade. I have him on filter. But I suspect he might have imploded at this volume, price movement and messages posted on LSE.

13p close imho

It would be interesting to have a rough idea of how much the costs incurred would be for AFC. Is it 50% of current expenditure? 20%? It is quite open ended.

My main reason for wondering, pre-revenue this could keep cash flow running into 2027.

Daz, how about just ignoring it. Himself, Stockcheque and whatever other usernames are all the same thing- a constant drip of nothing or the same info over and over. Barring them being unemployed and extremely bored, they clearly have an agenda.

About 50% of the posts here the past few days have been about 'Ade'. How about not responding.

> the first week of June.

It could easily be sooner as they've already intimated that they're speaking to major potential partners of the cracker it's not exactly insider info that would prevent news sooner.

The fundraise angle is plausible, as is shorts closing / sentiment improving / director buys and of course the potential for game changing news.

It's clear the current UK govt see hydrogen playing a major part of the energy transition. Lots of the renewable investment funds are trading at a hefty discount but recovering with interest rates reducing- but it feels like there's still uncertainty with any legislation changes about energy pricing. This would surely be less of a problem for hydrogen/AFC given the intent to subsidise it and drive down costs of the supply chain.

It's all whataboutery in the end as any SP increase here is going to be off the back of a large customer order, as it has been for a considerable time. Til then, it's a traders share.

>seeing certain people just go back on forward at each other on here constantly.

Once you filter Ade and whoever it is that copies and pastes the same things over and over (obviously no respect on wasting people's time), then overlook the people replying to them- you'll find the board is pretty quiet and this is what it boils down to, waiting on some tangible news.

Hefty volume. Great to see the AFC team backing their intent with share purchases. It seems like good news cannot be far away.

Surely those shorts closing would add another 3-4p to the SP.

What will be the share price at 10:30, any how many shares traded below and above the mid price.

Freshly posted on AFC LinkedIn

https://www.afcenergy.com/media/3snftwtn/280325-afc-energy-annual-report-and-accounts-for-website.pdf - Annual Report and Accounts 2024

Are you coming good after your minute by minute analysis of buys being labelled as sells etc? I'm going to have to guess you know a thing or two by the time you hang around this share, problem is you post positive stuff one day, negative the next - and most people have you filtered.

The fuel. Which quite likely will be subsidised.

>who the hell produces a product at such grossly over inflated cost that you can address 66%

Pretty easy with a frontier technology. Just look at the cost of solar, lithium batteries and generally anything along green energy/LCOE lines.

Was dispelling the order book wrt committed and uncommitted orders. It sounded like he said previous guidance was misleading.

It is what it is. And water under the bridge.

As someone mentioned a few days back wrt subsidies, it's not the tech that needs subsidies, it's the hydrogen itself.

If you filter people who've made more than a couple of posts on average a day, you'll probably find what you're after. Though you might have to scroll through pages of "this post has been filtered"

Probably due to:

"parity with a stage 5 diesel generator, accelerating the transition to clean energy at price point equivalence"

I'd traded down to an average of £1 based on 20% of my original holding but have added more around £2.50.