The latest Investing Matters Podcast episode featuring financial educator and author Jared Dillian has been released. Listen here.
You're basically saying no one thought Amazon would make loads of money but they did, and AFC could do too, presumably it would be reflected in the share price.
Not exactly compelling.
Hydrogen has a future in the energy economy, I don't think anyone would argue with that. And AFC are in a great position to capitalise on it.
Isn't that where the gunpowder is, that capitalising on it...
Amazon sells 12 million products to ~billions of people.
AFC will sell hydrogen related products to the margin of energy demand that cannot be electrified.
Surely you're comparing apples and oranges. There is a huge demand for hydrogen but it isn't as ubiquitous as general consumers forking out x% of their disposable income, surely.
>4. Awaiting update on Tamgo deal with Saudi Arabia & 16 other countries.
Especially with their visit to AFC. https://www.linkedin.com/posts/afc-energy_hpower-hydrogen-fuelcells-activity-7140355785821184001-DUfp/
1 month ago, news awaits.
Do you honestly think anyone is going to base their decisions on Ade's sentence or two about his latest 24 hour prediction.
The copy/paste stuff really isn't necessary. StockCheque does seem to provide much of the unique and useful information to the board as well as his own insights, but I don't see how drowning the board in "he says, she says" posts does anyone any favours, unless this is their preferred way to kill time.
Your posting history suggests you're wrong a lot of the time. You clearly are a bit obsessed with this share. 233 posts, 30 days all saying what "I am clever, I predict X, I conflate absence of evidence with evidence of absence"
If your motivation is to suck the life and passion out of any thinking person's mind, you do seem to be quite good at it or certainly aspire to it. You certainly put the time into it.
Not hard to see why people would imply that you're paid to be around here when even the long term unemployed have better things to do.
RE: Hydrogen and "Ade"
20th December, price 18.94p "2 Rusty metal boxes on the back of trailers pictured at some airfield. Yeah this looks like a company that's worth 1B MC..."
4th December, price 15.00p "Hydrogen companies are all up anyway with COP giving a push.
So todays rise here is nothing but COP sentiment very disappointing day for AF"
Oh dear. 25% the wrong way in the space of a month. 'must be the spread'
Like I said previously, feel free to point out conclusively what is a buy vs a sell. You don't know.
I'm not going to get into a circular argument with you if you can't remember several posts previous.
Here's an example of your mouthings:
Low volume: it'll go down
Large spread: It'll go down
Red trades: It'll go down
Ambiguous trades: It'll go down
All buys: It'll go down.
It just seems like your overwhelming modus operandi is just so be some devil's advocate. Seems like you'll even lose money on your trades for it.
The sad fact is it's not worth anyone's time to point out all the contradictions in your posts, even if they span barely a week or two.
You might feel the MC is overpriced, but there's simply no backbone in anything you come out with. It all just screams like you're looking for some sort of life distraction to fill up your spare time. Maybe try a dating site.
Do you remember that time the SP was around 13-14p and you were still calling it lower. Then the other week saying you'd changed your mind and believed you had it wrong.
A lot of your posts seem to allude to numberwang in your head.
Do you have definitive knowledge of what is a buy vs a sell because quite often buys are below the bid/ask and sells are above the bid/ask.
Is this just another case of you trying to make another whimsical point to support your idea the SP should be lower. Happy to be proven wrong if you definitively know the buy/sell ratio.