RE: Funding26 May 2026 12:10
Simple fact why there is no deadline is because we need them so much more than they need us. Greenwashing aside and improvements in financials there is nothing for MSC or Morocco to actually need our product. They make enough money and can just increase costs to their customers on the back of `prices and costs` and they will just have to be paid. Nobody is not using MSC ships because of their price! IMO we are a luxury product that actually nobody needs but would make things better so putting down red lines etc would be commercially destructive. What irks me massively is when AM said we were turning business away! Pathetic for me, especially knowing how far away things were. Fortunately Peter wants more, but now is obviously finding out how difficult it is to convert. All of us that are invested here can hope for is a contract to go through, UTAH all though a long way away need us more for the process but again loads of work needed to be done first before any meaningful money comes in.
IMO its always high risk/reward here, no amount of e-mails to the board will make any difference. Only voting at an AGM will. I want a major change in their communications and will be voting for certain individuals out on next elections, that`s the only say I have, I trust those invested to do likewise. Simple aspect is that all will be forgotten if they can deliver progress before the next fundraise/AGM but again IMO they will have no problem raising funds as someone out there will want that potential easy money off the back of loyal long term shareholders. There are also still people out there shorting the stock so as always the `chat` is always going to be based on an individuals needs as well! Good luck genuine holders, lets hope for progress or lets make our votes count for something at the next AGM.