Member Info for triumph1

Kim is absolutely 100% spot on.

CrustyPete, yes they can buy stock in blocks off the CLN holders. But they are NOT and are NEVER IN A MILLION YEARS going to. I can guarantee you this. Nobody is looking to build a sizeable position in this company right now! Who on earth would do that and why???

If you cannot see why that will never happen in a million years, you really shouldnt be investing! Suggesting that funds and IIs are buying is utter rubbish. Foolish wisthful thinking at best. Every single piece of evidence points to the exact opposite happening. The only mugs who are touching this are small PIs who are utterly clueless.

With CLNs, sooner or later the company may release some good news to churn some volume for the CLN holders to exit! You will hear the rampers declare "victory" and how wrong we all were regarding the death spiral. Do not be fooled and sell out immediately on any spike! Because you can be as sure as day follows night, the CLN hloders will dump very heavy into any meaningful volume! They will be laughing to the bank, and able to convert at a crazy low wvap on any big rise, netting huge profits! This is how they work! This is their business model!

Think and dont give your money to these vultures! Its a pure gample if you are trying to time a release of good news. There are much better opportunities elsewhere.

Is this dirty dog dead and buried yet? Sanderson gutted the last out of the company selling off assets a few months back, so surely thats it now.

SS...your time is up. Down to the dole office with ya

Every facet of the current system is systematically bent and abused. From the porous borders, the so called skilled worker visas, the immigration advisers advising their clients to break the law, and even immigration solicitors setting up meetings with others who can help obtain "skilled worker visas" when they are not entitled to one, up to sham marrages and arranged marriages for financial gain. It is a farce, a shambles. I can guarantee now, 95% of immigration advisers advise their clients to break the law!

It is systemic, thoroughlly rotten to the very very core. The entire system is utterly broken.

And i know this through experience! I have seen it with my own eyes. Then you have idiots like ASI talk utter crap about how the system is in fact not broken, but we are all xenophobes.

Spot on bloomers! If this was late 30s, early 40s germany, ASI and the other one STP would have been right little nartzis manning the pitstops en route to auschwitz whilst lecturing the rest of us how evil we are.

self-righteous, virtue signalling hypocrites to the max. I say the govt should should set up a salary sacrifice scheme for this sort. A chunk of their income gets diverted to causes that are supposedly so close to their hearts. Lets see how many sign up.

Its true harleygreen. How very dare a business strive to make a profit. Every business will now be petrified of making a profit as its seen as evil to do so and will be taken from them.

No big players are stupid enough to invest in a massive housebuilding campaign and then have this government pull the rug from under them and steal their profits.

ASI cannot argue with logic, thought, rationality and poise. Anyone who is for controlled borders is an outright xenophobic, r4ci5t, yaxley loving right winger who sleeps under a union jack duvet set at night. No ifs, no buts. You must be pro open borders to not be a xenophobe.

This is the caliber of moron we are dealing with here. To be on ASI's banned list is where everyone should strive to be on. It is an honour.

Yes ASI, that is exactly why North Korea is a pariah state. Because they closed their border to....migrants? Or their own citizens? Wouldnt have anything to do with their nuclear arsenal would it?

WTF haha

Well they have to pay the hotel bill for your migrants somehow, dont they ASI?

And what better way to do that than take out of your wallet as opposed to mine. After all, you are the one that advocates for them to flood in, so you pay for them! Wouldnt you agree ASI?

That is unless of course you are a hypocrite, and just like your other alter ego, your principles are rather cheap and overshadowed when it comes to your wallet.

Be careful what you wish for ASI!

Oh my, well i never. Who would have thunk it? Those pesky socialists eh STP?

Isnt it just ASI. People start rethinking their political persuasions when their wallet is hit and start forgetting who they were.

Looks like labour will go gung ho for banks now! Age old and straight from the socialists playbook. Lets target the big old mean greedy fat cat bankers and profit guzzling banks. You wont get any rebellion from the citizenry, on the contrary they will lap it up and call you hero.

Actually, the only thing i am surprised of is that they didnt target sooner.

Things could have further to fall across the banking sector!

My goodness, thats the first decent thing you said STP. But then imagine what Corbyn will have planned.

You enjoy your present conundrum on which ale to select.

What? How can you be a socialist and a capitalist? Your views are totally incompatible. You are so so confused, just like your other alter ego.

The question was simple! Would you be happy for the labour government to fund their socialist agendas by cutting the interest rate recieved on commercial bank reserves at the BOE? Quite a conundrum for you is it not STP. Choose your socialist principles, or your wallet! You simply cannot have both as socialism does not allow it!

Are you a person of principle, or is money thus self interest more important?

And how could you then support Jeremy Corbyn?? Imagine what he would do. He would strip the banks bare, re nationalise and give the proceeds to hamas.

You are really confused in thought STP.

I think its a great policy taverham, i would be in full support. The Uk is far too generous with the interest paid on these reserves to commercial banks, and would more than cover this so called black hole! It would save tens of billions of pounds a year!

Yes the market may throw a hissy and it may bring into question the independence of the BoE, but this is bettter than raiding businesses and the middle classes with neverending taxes!

So come on STP? What say you? In one foul swoop, the government could balance the books by this one action, and wouldnt have to cut welfare so you can still claim your UC, PIP and whatever benefits your recieve. Commercial banks would be affected however, in which you hold shares.

What do you think about this policy? Lets see if your principles are more important than your wallet?? Ha...doubt it. Total hypocrite.

I see what you are saying 67sam. The thing is, she cant exactly come out with an interview stating what she really thinks of her budget. So i dont read into these interviews much. I only look at the context in which the budget was created in.

I still do believe she knows what she is doing is wrong, and that she is not a fundamental socialist. But its not really in her control to make it right. It was her who wanted the wefare cuts and wanted to push ahead with them. Being a chancellor you are in a position of immense power, but is also a very reactive position in government. She is certainly no Gordon Brown, a fiscally astute and very intelligent man who knew what he was doing as chancellor (but terrible leader), but he had Tony Blair who was a very good leader and held the party together well. Then again, Maggie wrung out and thrashed socialism in politics throughout the 80s and into the early 90s, so blair was fortunate enough to inherit her legacy of not having such a big issue to deal with with regards to rebelling socialist backbenchers, and he always kept them in check. Blair and brown together, with blair as leader and brown running things in the background were an absolute unit, a formidable political duo!

Fastworward to these days, and socialism has come back with a vengance and is rife! So put yourself in the shoes of her. You have kier starmer as your leader, who has no idea who he is himself, flipflops on every decision and is simply not a natural leader or galvaniser like blair was and has no control over his party. You have a huge rebelling socialist backbench faction that threatens rebellion with every utter of the word wefare cut. You have the bond market breathing down your neck just waiting for you to admit defeat, break your own fiscal rules so they can send the yields soaring. So she is facing a war on all fronts with nobody helping. I do get the feeling she wants to put in place sensible policies, but the leader of the day and politics of the present labour government simply dont allow this, no matter who the chancellor was.

In this respect, i feel for her. Starmer must step up and take on these rebelling backbenchers who veto every welfare cut. They cannot tax the country to death and expect the economy to grow. The french are even beginning to understand this, and are beginning to take on the socialists in government to push through desperately needed cuts by threatening with the IMF bogeyman. One day, starmer must do the same here. And thay day of reckoning will be soon.

Currently, everytime you hear of a new policy, you start to panic and think how the government are going to rob you. How can anyone plan anything long term in such a hostile environment?

Now, Angela Rayner is a different matter. She is vile in my opinion. A hypocrite of the highest order, a disgustingly jealous champagne socialist if there ever was one. Except a bottle of lambrini as opposed to champagne is more her style

- Left of Labour (LOL)

- The Leftovers

- Left Behind Party

- Fruit and Nut

- Jezbollah

- Sultana & the Fruitcakes

- Socialist Union Metropolitan Party (Sump)

Hilarious. Had to share this. Jezbollah is my personal favorite, folowed by the leftovers followed by sultana & the fruitcakes.

And to prove how moderate and objective i am, i absolutely do feel sorry for Rachel Reeves. She is stuck between a rock and hard place, and is being scapegoated left, right and centre for Starmers weakness.

I do not beleve she wants to raise taxes. But the rest of her party are leaving her with no other viable option, and starmer is too weak to control these socialist backbenchers. If he banged their heads together to knock sense into them, and pushed through planned welfare cuts instead of constant u-turns, then we would not be in this mess with bond yields going through the roof.

So what choice does she realistically have? Breaking her own fiscal rules would be an utter calamity and would sent bond yields to the moon! There would be a meltdown.

Her party refuses to back desperately needed public spending cuts. She cannot break fiscal rules. So the only other option is higher taxes. Where and what to tax is obviously in her control, but still her party is hellbent on punishing ambition.

The buck firmly stops at weak starmer who cannot control the significant, cancerous socialist faction within his party.

Its called political strategy STP. Learn a thing will you for christs sake.

In depth policy specifics this far out of a general election are ovbiously going to be mute or drip fed. We may see more specifics in the run up to local elections however.

Bombastic, headline grabbing announcments come first. Then specifics will be published closer to the general election. This is politics 101. Every party does this! For example....labour announced they will abolish the leasehold system of home ownership within the first 100 days without an atom of how they would achieve it. And here we are, pen has not even met paper on this. That was dropped faster than a fatty who sat down too fast.

Trust me when i say, Farage knows the imporance of fiscal soundness. He is trying to galvanise moderate right wingers, ex tories and neoliberals who are less caring of immigration ideaology and much more fiscally fine tuned and can see through cheap bombastic headlines stating x amount. To get our vote, we will expect to see a thorough costing on tax cut plans, savings though welfare/net zero cuts and sound growth projections.

He knows £100bn in tax cuts must be countered in equal measures by slashing spending to that amount, or create one hell of a growth plan pitch to the bond boys. If they dont, the bond market will show no mercy to such an indebted country like the UK. Yes, we have not seen any in depth details of how this will be achieved...yet! But we will do. He must show this to get into power, and he knows this.

Immigration hard ass wont get him into power alone, and certainly wouldnt win me over. I am also waiting for details of these ambitious tax cut plans. But we wont get them until much closer to elections.

Utter nonsense STP. Farage has never had any power to make any decisions. So run away from what exactly?? How could he have anticipated the utter incompetence and failiure of the tories and labour government to utilise brexit to its full potential? How could any of us?

Yes he is the father and architect of brexit. But he had absolutely zero power in any decision making regarding brexit deals. He has had no opportunity to fall on his sword.

Who better to govern a brexit britain than the father and architect of brexit!!!

I am willing to give him the opportunity, with the caveat of me being the sword bearer. And i have absolutely no doubt every neoliberal thinks precisely the same! If he failed to deliver, god help him. We would be the ones driving our swords into him.

*incompetence

Well, i sold too soon. But nevermind, i am still happy. And over the moon for all you long term guys that have kept the faith, and seriously wish this goes to the moon for you all.

The fact that SOLG are sitting on a mountain of the yellow and red stuff has never been in doubt. Its always been the competence of those managing this amazing resource that sent it to the duldrums. Lets hope now the company has finally turned a corner, and we finally see its true value.

As the saying goes, value will out!

A Simple Investor walks into a bar...

"Howdy, what can i get you", said the landlord.

"Give me a pint of your finest stock", said a simple investor.

"i have just the thing you are looking for", said the landlord gleefully whilst reaching underneath the counter. "Try this, its called HE1". Thats £1,000 please.

"Bit expensive", said a simple investor. "Au contraire, tis the finest in the land, rare and will surely go up in value. This will be the perfect pick me up for you", said the landlord.

"We have liftoff" Exclaims a simple investor in a high pitched voice feeling a tug as a sip is taken. However the only thing that proceeds to lift off is the shirt off a simple investors back.

Meanwhile, the regulars just laugh. One shouts to the landlord; "Launa, another so soon?".